You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by "Matthias Reischenbacher (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/05/29 14:35:03 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1099) [PATCH] footnotes within tables and lists get lost

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14012320#comment-14012320 ] 

Matthias Reischenbacher commented on FOP-1099:
----------------------------------------------

After more detailed testing I discovered that footnotes inside the table header were listed after footnotes inside the table body. I reworked the patch form Simon in order to fix that. I removed the new code dependency between page breaking and table related classes, which means that the repetition of footnotes in case of tables spanning multiple pages is also gone. I also attempted to reuse some footnote related code in a FootnoteUtil class. It would be nice to combine both patches and make the repetition configurable but that exceeds by far my knowledge of the layout related code. I'm attaching my patch in case someone wants to continue working on that.

> [PATCH] footnotes within tables and lists get lost
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FOP-1099
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1099
>             Project: Fop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: layout/unqualified
>    Affects Versions: trunk
>         Environment: Operating System: other
> Platform: Other
>            Reporter: gerhard oettl
>         Attachments: 1044-tab-header-footnote-no-repeat.patch, b37579.diff, b37579.diff, b37579_2.patch, bugzilla37579.patch, dorfchronik.fo, dorfchronik.fo.list3, dorfchronik.fo.table3, footnote.fo, footnoteintable.patch, footnotes.080502.diff, footnotespatch, fussnote.fo, table_list_footnotes.diff, vtest.fo
>
>
> Footnote outside of tables works, inside table-cell not.
> The compliance page only speaks about restrictions within multicolumn documents.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)