You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Amedeo Rinaldo <ba...@gmail.com> on 2012/06/29 13:24:44 UTC

URIBL_GREY .. priority

I've grepped the entire filesystem and google a little but I'm not able 
to understand the reason why URIBL_GREY check has a so high priority ..
In my logs I can see that some messages which should be shortcircuited 
(priority -970) still hit that URIBL_GREY check.

Any hints ? ..thnx



-- 
Amedeo Rinaldo
  .''`.
: :' : * Relax, Take It Easy.. *
`. `'
   `-

Re: URIBL_GREY .. priority

Posted by Amedeo Rinaldo <ba...@gmail.com>.
Il 29/06/2012 13:50, Henrik K ha scritto:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 01:24:44PM +0200, Amedeo Rinaldo wrote:
>>
>> ..[CUT].. why URIBL_GREY check has a so high priority ..[CUT]..
>
> It's because SpamAssassin sends DNS requests before rules are run.
> You can work around this as I have, but it requires lots of internal code
> changes.


GGrrr ..work work work, ..more.. on Friday!! :-)))

Thanks Henrik, have a nice week-end!



-- 
Amedeo Rinaldo
  .''`.
: :' : * Relax, Take It Easy.. *
`. `'
   `-

Re: URIBL_GREY .. priority

Posted by Henrik K <he...@hege.li>.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 01:24:44PM +0200, Amedeo Rinaldo wrote:
> 
> I've grepped the entire filesystem and google a little but I'm not
> able to understand the reason why URIBL_GREY check has a so high
> priority ..
> In my logs I can see that some messages which should be
> shortcircuited (priority -970) still hit that URIBL_GREY check.
> 
> Any hints ? ..thnx

It's because SpamAssassin sends DNS requests before rules are run.

You can work around this as I have, but it requires lots of internal code
changes.