You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jmeter-dev@jakarta.apache.org by sebb <se...@gmail.com> on 2005/08/17 21:14:14 UTC
iSaSiLk - should we drop the classes that use it?
As the subject says - I think we should probably drop the classes that
depend on the (commercial) iSaSiLk package.
I don't think it's now necessary, given the JSSE support in 1.4, and
it would simplify the builds a bit if it were removed.
S.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: iSaSiLk - should we drop the classes that use it?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
I don't either / Ant does.
But setting up Eclipse is tedious.
I'll leave this for after 2.1.
S.
On 17/08/05, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +0
>
> I don't use iSaSiLk, but I thought our ANT checks for that.
>
> peter
>
>
> On 8/17/05, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > As the subject says - I think we should probably drop the classes that
> > depend on the (commercial) iSaSiLk package.
> >
> > I don't think it's now necessary, given the JSSE support in 1.4, and
> > it would simplify the builds a bit if it were removed.
> >
> > S.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: iSaSiLk - should we drop the classes that use it?
Posted by Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com>.
+0
I don't use iSaSiLk, but I thought our ANT checks for that.
peter
On 8/17/05, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As the subject says - I think we should probably drop the classes that
> depend on the (commercial) iSaSiLk package.
>
> I don't think it's now necessary, given the JSSE support in 1.4, and
> it would simplify the builds a bit if it were removed.
>
> S.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: iSaSiLk - should we drop the classes that use it?
Posted by Michael Stover <ms...@apache.org>.
+5
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 20:14 +0100, sebb wrote:
> As the subject says - I think we should probably drop the classes that
> depend on the (commercial) iSaSiLk package.
>
> I don't think it's now necessary, given the JSSE support in 1.4, and
> it would simplify the builds a bit if it were removed.
>
> S.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org