You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> on 2007/12/31 18:40:14 UTC

[VOTE] Release ServiceMix Runtime 1.0-m1

I've uploaded a distribution of ServiceMix Runtime 1.0-m1.

http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/servicemix-runtime-1.0-m1/org/apache/servicemix/runtime/apache-servicemix-runtime/1.0-m1/
The svn tag is available at

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/runtime/tags/runtime-1.0-m1/

Please review carefully (this is the first release of this subproject, so we
need to make sure legal stuff is ok) and vote

[ ] +1 Release ServiceMix Runtime 1.0-m1
[ ] -1 Do not release

-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix Runtime 1.0-m1

Posted by Jeff Yu <je...@gmail.com>.

+ 1



On Jan 3, 2008 4:58 PM, Freeman Fang <fr...@iona.com> wrote:

> Both src and binary kit works well on linux/windows for me.
> My +1
>
> Freeman
>
> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > I've uploaded a distribution of ServiceMix Runtime 1.0-m1.
> >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/servicemix-runtime-1.0-m1/org/apache/servicemix/runtime/apache-servicemix-runtime/1.0-m1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/servicemix-runtime-1.0-m1/org/apache/servicemix/runtime/apache-servicemix-runtime/1.0-m1/>
> > The svn tag is available at
> >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/runtime/tags/runtime-1.0-m1/
> >
> > Please review carefully (this is the first release of this subproject,
> so we
> > need to make sure legal stuff is ok) and vote
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release ServiceMix Runtime 1.0-m1
> > [ ] -1 Do not release
> >
> >
>



-- 
Thanks
Jeff

Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix Runtime 1.0-m1

Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@iona.com>.

Both src and binary kit works well on linux/windows for me.
My +1

Freeman

Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've uploaded a distribution of ServiceMix Runtime 1.0-m1.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/servicemix-runtime-1.0-m1/org/apache/servicemix/runtime/apache-servicemix-runtime/1.0-m1/
> The svn tag is available at
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/runtime/tags/runtime-1.0-m1/
>
> Please review carefully (this is the first release of this subproject, so we
> need to make sure legal stuff is ok) and vote
>
> [ ] +1 Release ServiceMix Runtime 1.0-m1
> [ ] -1 Do not release
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix Runtime 1.0-m1

Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.

Oh, and to make it official....

I change my (non-binding) -1 to a (non-binding) +1 for the full assembly, 
but keep the (non-binding) -1 for the artifact that is missing the 
LICENSE/NOTICE files.

:-)

Dan



On Friday 04 January 2008, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Friday 04 January 2008, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > Yeah, good catch.  It seem the bin/servicemix.jar is missing those,
> > while the other jars are ok.
> > What about publishing the distributions only ? It's just a milestone
> > and the jars themselves are not so useful.
>
> You're the release manager.   That's your call.    :-)    I'm OK with
> it.
>
> Of course, without the jars, could the other non-runtime things be
> built against it?   AKA:  can you do a M1 of the non runtime things?
>
> Dan
>
> > On Jan 4, 2008 3:22 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Guillaume,
> > >
> > > I'd have to say -1
> > >
> > > The jars don't have the required NOTICE/LICENSE files in them.  
> > > The final assembly is OK, but the jars themselves are not so they
> > > cannot be synced into central or any other repo.
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > On Friday 04 January 2008, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > > > I will extend the vote a bit to allow more time to review (given
> > > > lots of people were in vacations).
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 31, 2007 6:40 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> > > > > I've uploaded a distribution of ServiceMix Runtime 1.0-m1.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/servicemix-runtime-1.
> > > > >0-
> > > > > m1/o<http://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/servicemix-run
> > > > >tim e-1.0-m1/o>
> > > > > rg/apache/servicemix/runtime/apache-servicemix-runtime/1.0-m1/
> > > > >
> > > > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/servicemix-runtime
> > > > >-1 .0-m
> > > > > 1/org/apache/servicemix/runtime/apache-servicemix-runtime/1.0-
> > > > >m1 /> The svn tag is available at
> > > > >
> > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/runtime/tags/r
> > > > >un time -1.0-m1/
> > > > >
> > > > > Please review carefully (this is the first release of this
> > > > > subproject, so we need to make sure legal stuff is ok) and
> > > > > vote
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Release ServiceMix Runtime 1.0-m1
> > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > > > ------------------------
> > > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > > --
> > > J. Daniel Kulp
> > > Principal Engineer, IONA
> > > dkulp@apache.org
> > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog



-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer, IONA
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix Runtime 1.0-m1

Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.

On Friday 04 January 2008, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Yeah, good catch.  It seem the bin/servicemix.jar is missing those,
> while the other jars are ok.
> What about publishing the distributions only ? It's just a milestone
> and the jars themselves are not so useful.

You're the release manager.   That's your call.    :-)    I'm OK with it.

Of course, without the jars, could the other non-runtime things be built 
against it?   AKA:  can you do a M1 of the non runtime things?

Dan


> On Jan 4, 2008 3:22 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Guillaume,
> >
> > I'd have to say -1
> >
> > The jars don't have the required NOTICE/LICENSE files in them.   The
> > final assembly is OK, but the jars themselves are not so they cannot
> > be synced into central or any other repo.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On Friday 04 January 2008, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > > I will extend the vote a bit to allow more time to review (given
> > > lots of people were in vacations).
> > >
> > > On Dec 31, 2007 6:40 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I've uploaded a distribution of ServiceMix Runtime 1.0-m1.
> > > >
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/servicemix-runtime-1.0-
> > > >m1/o<http://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/servicemix-runtim
> > > >e-1.0-m1/o>
> > > > rg/apache/servicemix/runtime/apache-servicemix-runtime/1.0-m1/
> > > >
> > > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/servicemix-runtime-1
> > > >.0-m
> > > > 1/org/apache/servicemix/runtime/apache-servicemix-runtime/1.0-m1
> > > >/> The svn tag is available at
> > > >
> > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/runtime/tags/run
> > > >time -1.0-m1/
> > > >
> > > > Please review carefully (this is the first release of this
> > > > subproject, so we need to make sure legal stuff is ok) and vote
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release ServiceMix Runtime 1.0-m1
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > > ------------------------
> > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >
> > --
> > J. Daniel Kulp
> > Principal Engineer, IONA
> > dkulp@apache.org
> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog



-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer, IONA
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog