Re: capacity of secondaey stor us eq 0. bug ir known ussue?

[benoit lair <ku...@gmail.com>]

Hello,

I have the same issue with cs 4.2 installed from the cloudstack rpm
repositories (the stable ones), found no way to get an ssvm operationnal.

Thanks.


2013/9/28 Netmaster <we...@colobridge.net>

> Hallo,
> we have several installation of cloudstack 4.2
> In dashboard the capacity of secondary storage equal 0kb
> We have standart nfs.
> Api backed the same error, capacity of resource type 6 is 0
> The secondary stor vm (system vm) shows normall capacity of 10tb,
> as it have to be.
> Is it bug or known issue?
> Thanks

Re: [SOLVED] Re: capacity of secondaey stor us eq 0. bug ir known ussue?

[benoit lair <ku...@gmail.com>]

Yes, Nitin. In fact i ran the ssvm check script.

It said me my nfs server was not reachable, but no more information about
it. So I had to investigate in order to retrieve the real reason why my nfs
server was not reachable. Ssvm check script only says that it can't
communicate with your nfs server.

Thought explaining with details my investigation could give some tips or
some ideas to somebody troubleshooting its own system.

Regards,

Benoit.


2013/10/4 Nitin Mehta <Ni...@citrix.com>

> That¹s great Benoit. You could have also found this out running the ssvm
> health check script.
> Thumb rule - In case of ssvm/secondary storage related issues first
> troubleshooting step is to run ssvm health check script
>
> On 04/10/13 1:37 AM, "benoit lair" <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >Issue resolved for me.
> >
> >In my case, my dashboard said me, i have 0kb of storage on my secondary
> >storage.
> >
> >The reason was not due to the cs 4.2, but it was entirely my fault due to
> >a
> >misconfiguration :
> >
> >My ssvm was correctly deploying, but it can't communicate with my nfs
> >server.
> >
> >The reason was because i misconfigured my storage traffic label for
> >xenserver, so my storage traffic was routed on the bad nic on the
> >hypervisor, so the storage vlan was not available et so the ssvm cloudn't
> >ping to the nfs server.
> >
> >If the ssvm can't ping to the nfs server, it can't mount it, if can't
> >mount, it does not recognize the right size of the nfs server volume, so
> >0kb.
> >
> >So, if dashboard says secondary storage at 0kb, there is probably a
> >network
> >issue with my nfs server.
> >
> >
> >Regards, Benoit.
> >
> >
> >2013/10/4 Nitin Mehta <Ni...@citrix.com>
> >
> >> This generally should happen because of management server not able to
> >> communicate with the SSVM agent.
> >> Could you run the ssvm health check script to see if the connection is
> >> healthy btwn ssvm and CS ?
> >>
> >> On 03/10/13 3:39 AM, "benoit lair" <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hello,
> >> >
> >> >I have the same issue with cs 4.2 installed from the cloudstack rpm
> >> >repositories (the stable ones), found no way to get an ssvm
> >>operationnal.
> >> >
> >> >Thanks.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >2013/9/28 Netmaster <we...@colobridge.net>
> >> >
> >> >> Hallo,
> >> >> we have several installation of cloudstack 4.2
> >> >> In dashboard the capacity of secondary storage equal 0kb
> >> >> We have standart nfs.
> >> >> Api backed the same error, capacity of resource type 6 is 0
> >> >> The secondary stor vm (system vm) shows normall capacity of 10tb,
> >> >> as it have to be.
> >> >> Is it bug or known issue?
> >> >> Thanks
> >>
>
>

[SOLVED] Re: capacity of secondaey stor us eq 0. bug ir known ussue?

[Nitin Mehta <Ni...@citrix.com>]

That¹s great Benoit. You could have also found this out running the ssvm
health check script.
Thumb rule - In case of ssvm/secondary storage related issues first
troubleshooting step is to run ssvm health check script

On 04/10/13 1:37 AM, "benoit lair" <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>Issue resolved for me.
>
>In my case, my dashboard said me, i have 0kb of storage on my secondary
>storage.
>
>The reason was not due to the cs 4.2, but it was entirely my fault due to
>a
>misconfiguration :
>
>My ssvm was correctly deploying, but it can't communicate with my nfs
>server.
>
>The reason was because i misconfigured my storage traffic label for
>xenserver, so my storage traffic was routed on the bad nic on the
>hypervisor, so the storage vlan was not available et so the ssvm cloudn't
>ping to the nfs server.
>
>If the ssvm can't ping to the nfs server, it can't mount it, if can't
>mount, it does not recognize the right size of the nfs server volume, so
>0kb.
>
>So, if dashboard says secondary storage at 0kb, there is probably a
>network
>issue with my nfs server.
>
>
>Regards, Benoit.
>
>
>2013/10/4 Nitin Mehta <Ni...@citrix.com>
>
>> This generally should happen because of management server not able to
>> communicate with the SSVM agent.
>> Could you run the ssvm health check script to see if the connection is
>> healthy btwn ssvm and CS ?
>>
>> On 03/10/13 3:39 AM, "benoit lair" <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hello,
>> >
>> >I have the same issue with cs 4.2 installed from the cloudstack rpm
>> >repositories (the stable ones), found no way to get an ssvm
>>operationnal.
>> >
>> >Thanks.
>> >
>> >
>> >2013/9/28 Netmaster <we...@colobridge.net>
>> >
>> >> Hallo,
>> >> we have several installation of cloudstack 4.2
>> >> In dashboard the capacity of secondary storage equal 0kb
>> >> We have standart nfs.
>> >> Api backed the same error, capacity of resource type 6 is 0
>> >> The secondary stor vm (system vm) shows normall capacity of 10tb,
>> >> as it have to be.
>> >> Is it bug or known issue?
>> >> Thanks
>>

Re: capacity of secondaey stor us eq 0. bug ir known ussue?

[benoit lair <ku...@gmail.com>]

Hello,

Issue resolved for me.

In my case, my dashboard said me, i have 0kb of storage on my secondary
storage.

The reason was not due to the cs 4.2, but it was entirely my fault due to a
misconfiguration :

My ssvm was correctly deploying, but it can't communicate with my nfs
server.

The reason was because i misconfigured my storage traffic label for
xenserver, so my storage traffic was routed on the bad nic on the
hypervisor, so the storage vlan was not available et so the ssvm cloudn't
ping to the nfs server.

If the ssvm can't ping to the nfs server, it can't mount it, if can't
mount, it does not recognize the right size of the nfs server volume, so
0kb.

So, if dashboard says secondary storage at 0kb, there is probably a network
issue with my nfs server.


Regards, Benoit.


2013/10/4 Nitin Mehta <Ni...@citrix.com>

> This generally should happen because of management server not able to
> communicate with the SSVM agent.
> Could you run the ssvm health check script to see if the connection is
> healthy btwn ssvm and CS ?
>
> On 03/10/13 3:39 AM, "benoit lair" <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >I have the same issue with cs 4.2 installed from the cloudstack rpm
> >repositories (the stable ones), found no way to get an ssvm operationnal.
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >
> >2013/9/28 Netmaster <we...@colobridge.net>
> >
> >> Hallo,
> >> we have several installation of cloudstack 4.2
> >> In dashboard the capacity of secondary storage equal 0kb
> >> We have standart nfs.
> >> Api backed the same error, capacity of resource type 6 is 0
> >> The secondary stor vm (system vm) shows normall capacity of 10tb,
> >> as it have to be.
> >> Is it bug or known issue?
> >> Thanks
>
>

Re: capacity of secondaey stor us eq 0. bug ir known ussue?

[Ivan Gladenko <we...@colobridge.net>]

thank you for your answer,
I tried ssvm health check script, everything looks nice - no error or 
warning, all works correct.

> This generally should happen because of management server not able to
> communicate with the SSVM agent.
> Could you run the ssvm health check script to see if the connection is
> healthy btwn ssvm and CS ?
>
> On 03/10/13 3:39 AM, "benoit lair" <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have the same issue with cs 4.2 installed from the cloudstack rpm
>> repositories (the stable ones), found no way to get an ssvm operationnal.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> 2013/9/28 Netmaster <we...@colobridge.net>
>>
>>> Hallo,
>>> we have several installation of cloudstack 4.2
>>> In dashboard the capacity of secondary storage equal 0kb
>>> We have standart nfs.
>>> Api backed the same error, capacity of resource type 6 is 0
>>> The secondary stor vm (system vm) shows normall capacity of 10tb,
>>> as it have to be.
>>> Is it bug or known issue?
>>> Thanks

Re: capacity of secondaey stor us eq 0. bug ir known ussue?

[Nitin Mehta <Ni...@citrix.com>]

This generally should happen because of management server not able to
communicate with the SSVM agent.
Could you run the ssvm health check script to see if the connection is
healthy btwn ssvm and CS ?

On 03/10/13 3:39 AM, "benoit lair" <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I have the same issue with cs 4.2 installed from the cloudstack rpm
>repositories (the stable ones), found no way to get an ssvm operationnal.
>
>Thanks.
>
>
>2013/9/28 Netmaster <we...@colobridge.net>
>
>> Hallo,
>> we have several installation of cloudstack 4.2
>> In dashboard the capacity of secondary storage equal 0kb
>> We have standart nfs.
>> Api backed the same error, capacity of resource type 6 is 0
>> The secondary stor vm (system vm) shows normall capacity of 10tb,
>> as it have to be.
>> Is it bug or known issue?
>> Thanks