RE: Problems with upgrade to SA 3.0.1

[Paul Grenda <pa...@softfish.com.au>]

Thanks Michele,



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michele@tristan.blacknight.ie
> [mailto:Michele@tristan.blacknight.ie]
> Sent: Sunday, 26 December 2004 8:43 AM
> To: Paul Grenda
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Problems with upgrade to SA 3.0.1
>
>
> Paul Grenda wrote:
> > I recently upgraded to SA3.0.1 but I still only seem to be able to catch
> > between 55% and 70% of spam.  I read a thread started by
> Florian Effenberger
> > and there was advice that he should upgrade Net::DNS.  So I ran
> > spamassassin -D --lint and it said debug: Net::DNS version is
> 0.26, but need
> > 0.34.  So I tried to upgrade to the latest version which is
> 0.48.  But it
> > had a dependency of Digest HMAC which had a dependency of
> Digest SHA.  So I
> > upgraded alll of these modules and got the Net::DNS test to work.  Did a
> > make install. then reran spamassassin -D --lint.  Unfortunately
> I still got
> > debug: Net::DNS version is 0.26, but need 0.34.  I've tried to
> find how to
> > independently determine the version number of Net::DNS but can't work it
> > out.
> > Any help would be appreciated.  btw merry Christmas.
>
> Install it manually from the tar.gz instead of from CPAN
>
I finally did as you suggested and after I got over all of the dependencies
it clicked into place.  Its now loaded Sapmassassin into the right directory
and the filtering has improved dramatically!

I do have two problems however,

Firstly Spamassassin no longer seems to use /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
which contains:
rewrite_header Subject -----SPAM-----

all mu mail that is tagged has the default *****SPAM*****

Secondly when I used 2.4 spam had the Spamassassin message and the mail in
one HTML document.  When I changed to 3.0.1 the spam mail was made into an
attachment to the Spamassassin message rather than part of the message.  Now
with 3.0.2 the format has reverted to the spam mail being part of the
Spamassassin message.  How can I make it so that the spam message is an
attachment to the Spamassassin message?

Thanks again.

Paul.