You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ranger.apache.org by Nikhil P <ni...@gmail.com> on 2017/09/01 14:00:58 UTC
Review Request 62029: In Nifi default policy is getting created with
policyitem without any user/group but permission is set for the same
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/62029/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, Don Bosco Durai, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
Bugs: RANGER-1750
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1750
Repository: ranger
Description
-------
In Nifi default policy are getting created with policyitem without any user/group but permission is set for the same. In ideal case this is not a valid policyitem.
Diffs
-----
security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/ServiceDBStore.java 9742265
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62029/diff/1/
Testing
-------
1)tested that during service creation if default policy does not have valid policyItem then policy wont be created.
2)tested Nifi policy and service CRUD works properly.
Thanks,
Nikhil P
Re: Review Request 62029: In Nifi default policy is getting created
with
policyitem without any user/group but permission is set for the same
Posted by Gautam Borad <gb...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/62029/#review185073
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Gautam Borad
On Sept. 11, 2017, 6:05 a.m., Nikhil P wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/62029/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Sept. 11, 2017, 6:05 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, Don Bosco Durai, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
>
>
> Bugs: RANGER-1750
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1750
>
>
> Repository: ranger
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> In Nifi default policy are getting created with policyitem without any user/group but permission is set for the same. In ideal case this is not a valid policyitem.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/ServiceDBStore.java 9742265
>
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62029/diff/2/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> 1)tested that during service creation if default policy does not have valid policyItem then policy wont be created.
> 2)tested Nifi policy and service CRUD works properly.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nikhil P
>
>
Re: Review Request 62029: In Nifi default policy is getting created
with
policyitem without any user/group but permission is set for the same
Posted by Nikhil P <ni...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/62029/
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated Sept. 11, 2017, 11:35 a.m.)
Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, Don Bosco Durai, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
Bugs: RANGER-1750
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1750
Repository: ranger
Description
-------
In Nifi default policy are getting created with policyitem without any user/group but permission is set for the same. In ideal case this is not a valid policyitem.
Diffs (updated)
-----
security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/ServiceDBStore.java 9742265
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62029/diff/2/
Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62029/diff/1-2/
Testing
-------
1)tested that during service creation if default policy does not have valid policyItem then policy wont be created.
2)tested Nifi policy and service CRUD works properly.
Thanks,
Nikhil P
Re: Review Request 62029: In Nifi default policy is getting created
with
policyitem without any user/group but permission is set for the same
Posted by Velmurugan Periasamy <vp...@hortonworks.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/62029/#review185003
-----------------------------------------------------------
Fix it, then Ship it!
security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/ServiceDBStore.java
Lines 2544 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/62029/#comment261236>
Wouldn't it be helpful to log this at WARN level?
- Velmurugan Periasamy
On Sept. 1, 2017, 2 p.m., Nikhil P wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/62029/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Sept. 1, 2017, 2 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, Don Bosco Durai, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
>
>
> Bugs: RANGER-1750
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1750
>
>
> Repository: ranger
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> In Nifi default policy are getting created with policyitem without any user/group but permission is set for the same. In ideal case this is not a valid policyitem.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/ServiceDBStore.java 9742265
>
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62029/diff/1/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> 1)tested that during service creation if default policy does not have valid policyItem then policy wont be created.
> 2)tested Nifi policy and service CRUD works properly.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nikhil P
>
>