You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@rave.apache.org by mf...@apache.org on 2013/01/08 18:20:35 UTC

svn commit: r1430393 - /rave/trunk/pom.xml

Author: mfranklin
Date: Tue Jan  8 17:20:35 2013
New Revision: 1430393

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1430393&view=rev
Log:
Returning trunk to prior release of Rave Master POM

Modified:
    rave/trunk/pom.xml

Modified: rave/trunk/pom.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/rave/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1430393&r1=1430392&r2=1430393&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- rave/trunk/pom.xml (original)
+++ rave/trunk/pom.xml Tue Jan  8 17:20:35 2013
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
     <parent>
         <groupId>org.apache.rave</groupId>
         <artifactId>rave-master</artifactId>
-        <version>0.19</version>
+        <version>0.10</version>
         <relativePath>../rave-master-pom/pom.xml</relativePath>
     </parent>
 



Re: svn commit: r1430393 - /rave/trunk/pom.xml

Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 01/09/2013 04:08 PM, Matt Franklin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>> The reference to the master pom will be changed to 0.19 again when it's
>> available in Maven Central (after a successful vote). Matt changed some
>> configuration for the rat plugin which checks for missing license headers
>> during the release and new committers were added. The changes don't affect
>> daily development so it's okay to temporarily revert the master pom version
>> in the project to 0.10 so Jenkins won't complain about the missing master
>> pom.
>
> Of course it won't be in maven central until a successful vote, which
> means everyone needs to review the release ;)

I'll try to find some time to review maybe (very) late this evening, or else 
tomorrow.

Ate

>
>>
>> Jasha
>>
>> On 9 January 2013 00:04, Chris Geer <ch...@cxtsoftware.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Does this affect 0.19 since it currently uses the 0.19 rave-master? Does
>>> the tag need to be recut?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:20 AM, <mf...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Author: mfranklin
>>>> Date: Tue Jan  8 17:20:35 2013
>>>> New Revision: 1430393
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1430393&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> Returning trunk to prior release of Rave Master POM
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>>      rave/trunk/pom.xml
>>>>
>>>> Modified: rave/trunk/pom.xml
>>>> URL:
>>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/rave/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1430393&r1=1430392&r2=1430393&view=diff
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- rave/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>>>> +++ rave/trunk/pom.xml Tue Jan  8 17:20:35 2013
>>>> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
>>>>       <parent>
>>>>           <groupId>org.apache.rave</groupId>
>>>>           <artifactId>rave-master</artifactId>
>>>> -        <version>0.19</version>
>>>> +        <version>0.10</version>
>>>>           <relativePath>../rave-master-pom/pom.xml</relativePath>
>>>>       </parent>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>


Re: svn commit: r1430393 - /rave/trunk/pom.xml

Posted by Matt Franklin <m....@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> The reference to the master pom will be changed to 0.19 again when it's
> available in Maven Central (after a successful vote). Matt changed some
> configuration for the rat plugin which checks for missing license headers
> during the release and new committers were added. The changes don't affect
> daily development so it's okay to temporarily revert the master pom version
> in the project to 0.10 so Jenkins won't complain about the missing master
> pom.

Of course it won't be in maven central until a successful vote, which
means everyone needs to review the release ;)

>
> Jasha
>
> On 9 January 2013 00:04, Chris Geer <ch...@cxtsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>> Does this affect 0.19 since it currently uses the 0.19 rave-master? Does
>> the tag need to be recut?
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:20 AM, <mf...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Author: mfranklin
>> > Date: Tue Jan  8 17:20:35 2013
>> > New Revision: 1430393
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1430393&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > Returning trunk to prior release of Rave Master POM
>> >
>> > Modified:
>> >     rave/trunk/pom.xml
>> >
>> > Modified: rave/trunk/pom.xml
>> > URL:
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/rave/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1430393&r1=1430392&r2=1430393&view=diff
>> >
>> >
>> ==============================================================================
>> > --- rave/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>> > +++ rave/trunk/pom.xml Tue Jan  8 17:20:35 2013
>> > @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
>> >      <parent>
>> >          <groupId>org.apache.rave</groupId>
>> >          <artifactId>rave-master</artifactId>
>> > -        <version>0.19</version>
>> > +        <version>0.10</version>
>> >          <relativePath>../rave-master-pom/pom.xml</relativePath>
>> >      </parent>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>

Re: svn commit: r1430393 - /rave/trunk/pom.xml

Posted by Jasha Joachimsthal <ja...@apache.org>.
The reference to the master pom will be changed to 0.19 again when it's
available in Maven Central (after a successful vote). Matt changed some
configuration for the rat plugin which checks for missing license headers
during the release and new committers were added. The changes don't affect
daily development so it's okay to temporarily revert the master pom version
in the project to 0.10 so Jenkins won't complain about the missing master
pom.

Jasha

On 9 January 2013 00:04, Chris Geer <ch...@cxtsoftware.com> wrote:

> Does this affect 0.19 since it currently uses the 0.19 rave-master? Does
> the tag need to be recut?
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:20 AM, <mf...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Author: mfranklin
> > Date: Tue Jan  8 17:20:35 2013
> > New Revision: 1430393
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1430393&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Returning trunk to prior release of Rave Master POM
> >
> > Modified:
> >     rave/trunk/pom.xml
> >
> > Modified: rave/trunk/pom.xml
> > URL:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/rave/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1430393&r1=1430392&r2=1430393&view=diff
> >
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > --- rave/trunk/pom.xml (original)
> > +++ rave/trunk/pom.xml Tue Jan  8 17:20:35 2013
> > @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
> >      <parent>
> >          <groupId>org.apache.rave</groupId>
> >          <artifactId>rave-master</artifactId>
> > -        <version>0.19</version>
> > +        <version>0.10</version>
> >          <relativePath>../rave-master-pom/pom.xml</relativePath>
> >      </parent>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: svn commit: r1430393 - /rave/trunk/pom.xml

Posted by Chris Geer <ch...@cxtsoftware.com>.
Does this affect 0.19 since it currently uses the 0.19 rave-master? Does
the tag need to be recut?

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:20 AM, <mf...@apache.org> wrote:

> Author: mfranklin
> Date: Tue Jan  8 17:20:35 2013
> New Revision: 1430393
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1430393&view=rev
> Log:
> Returning trunk to prior release of Rave Master POM
>
> Modified:
>     rave/trunk/pom.xml
>
> Modified: rave/trunk/pom.xml
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/rave/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1430393&r1=1430392&r2=1430393&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- rave/trunk/pom.xml (original)
> +++ rave/trunk/pom.xml Tue Jan  8 17:20:35 2013
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
>      <parent>
>          <groupId>org.apache.rave</groupId>
>          <artifactId>rave-master</artifactId>
> -        <version>0.19</version>
> +        <version>0.10</version>
>          <relativePath>../rave-master-pom/pom.xml</relativePath>
>      </parent>
>
>
>
>