You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@httpd.apache.org by "Sharl.Jimh.Tsin" <am...@gmail.com> on 2010/11/07 08:08:11 UTC
[users@httpd] Why do apache-devs not provide the x64 version of httpd binary?
You know,run 32bit httpd on windows server 08 r2 datacenter is bad enough.
Want the answer.
Best regards,
Sharl.Jimh.Tsin (From China **Obviously Taiwan INCLUDED**)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Why do apache-devs not provide the x64 version
of httpd binary?
Posted by "J. Greenlees" <li...@jaqui-greenlees.net>.
Sharl.Jimh.Tsin wrote:
> You know,run 32bit httpd on windows server 08 r2 datacenter is bad enough.
>
> Want the answer.
All windows builds are donated, not provided by the Apache Software
Foundation team developing the HTTPD project.
> Best regards,
> Sharl.Jimh.Tsin (From China **Obviously Taiwan INCLUDED**)
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Why do apache-devs not provide the x64 version of
httpd binary?
Posted by Jorge Schrauwen <jo...@gmail.com>.
Yes,
It's best to compile them your self.
I'm not sure the ones on blackdot are up to date. Especially the
modules, so compiling your self is the best route.
Also it isn't very hard. A lot of progress can still be made on that
front, but 2.2 is doable with a bit of effort.
Here is hoping 2.3 will be better.
~Jorge
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Sharl.Jimh.Tsin <am...@gmail.com> wrote:
> well,thanks for your reply.it seems to be that i have to bulid it by myself now.
>
> i use the x64 bit binary provided by blackdot this time.
>
> thanks all again.
>
> Best regards,
> Sharl.Jimh.Tsin (From China **Obviously Taiwan INCLUDED**)
>
>
>
> 2010/11/8 Jorge Schrauwen <jo...@gmail.com>:
>> IIRC it mostly has to do with the standardization on Visual C++ 6 for
>> building the windows build.
>> Always using the same compiler will ensure for better binary
>> compatibility of 3rd party modules.
>>
>> The switch to Visual C++ 2005/8/10 would result in breaking this standard.
>>
>> Also the benefit of running a 64-bit version compared to a 32-bit
>> version are negligible in most cases.
>> If you really wish to use 64-bit version, you can compile them your
>> self or take one of the community provided once.
>>
>> ~Jorge
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Sharl.Jimh.Tsin <am...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> You know,run 32bit httpd on windows server 08 r2 datacenter is bad enough.
>>>
>>> Want the answer.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Sharl.Jimh.Tsin (From China **Obviously Taiwan INCLUDED**)
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
>>> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>>> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
>> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Why do apache-devs not provide the x64 version of
httpd binary?
Posted by "Sharl.Jimh.Tsin" <am...@gmail.com>.
thanks.it is really a good idea :-)
Best regards,
Sharl.Jimh.Tsin (From China **Obviously Taiwan INCLUDED**)
2010/11/8 Krist van Besien <kr...@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Sharl.Jimh.Tsin <am...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> well,thanks for your reply.it seems to be that i have to bulid it by myself now.
>
> You could also choose not to run it on Windows.
> Install a modern Linux distritbution, and you'll have a 64bit server
> with apache in less than half an hour.
>
> Krist
>
> --
> krist.vanbesien@gmail.com
> krist@vanbesien.org
> Bremgarten b. Bern, Switzerland
> --
> A: It reverses the normal flow of conversation.
> Q: What's wrong with top-posting?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What's the biggest scourge on plain text email discussions?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Why do apache-devs not provide the x64 version of
httpd binary?
Posted by Krist van Besien <kr...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Sharl.Jimh.Tsin <am...@gmail.com> wrote:
> well,thanks for your reply.it seems to be that i have to bulid it by myself now.
You could also choose not to run it on Windows.
Install a modern Linux distritbution, and you'll have a 64bit server
with apache in less than half an hour.
Krist
--
krist.vanbesien@gmail.com
krist@vanbesien.org
Bremgarten b. Bern, Switzerland
--
A: It reverses the normal flow of conversation.
Q: What's wrong with top-posting?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What's the biggest scourge on plain text email discussions?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Why do apache-devs not provide the x64 version of
httpd binary?
Posted by "Sharl.Jimh.Tsin" <am...@gmail.com>.
well,thanks for your reply.it seems to be that i have to bulid it by myself now.
i use the x64 bit binary provided by blackdot this time.
thanks all again.
Best regards,
Sharl.Jimh.Tsin (From China **Obviously Taiwan INCLUDED**)
2010/11/8 Jorge Schrauwen <jo...@gmail.com>:
> IIRC it mostly has to do with the standardization on Visual C++ 6 for
> building the windows build.
> Always using the same compiler will ensure for better binary
> compatibility of 3rd party modules.
>
> The switch to Visual C++ 2005/8/10 would result in breaking this standard.
>
> Also the benefit of running a 64-bit version compared to a 32-bit
> version are negligible in most cases.
> If you really wish to use 64-bit version, you can compile them your
> self or take one of the community provided once.
>
> ~Jorge
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Sharl.Jimh.Tsin <am...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> You know,run 32bit httpd on windows server 08 r2 datacenter is bad enough.
>>
>> Want the answer.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Sharl.Jimh.Tsin (From China **Obviously Taiwan INCLUDED**)
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
>> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Why do apache-devs not provide the x64 version of
httpd binary?
Posted by Jorge Schrauwen <jo...@gmail.com>.
IIRC it mostly has to do with the standardization on Visual C++ 6 for
building the windows build.
Always using the same compiler will ensure for better binary
compatibility of 3rd party modules.
The switch to Visual C++ 2005/8/10 would result in breaking this standard.
Also the benefit of running a 64-bit version compared to a 32-bit
version are negligible in most cases.
If you really wish to use 64-bit version, you can compile them your
self or take one of the community provided once.
~Jorge
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Sharl.Jimh.Tsin <am...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You know,run 32bit httpd on windows server 08 r2 datacenter is bad enough.
>
> Want the answer.
>
> Best regards,
> Sharl.Jimh.Tsin (From China **Obviously Taiwan INCLUDED**)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org