You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> on 2006/09/05 16:47:47 UTC
SVN Repository Reorganization
Hi Everybody,
The ActiveMQ project has been growing tremendously and our source tree
now has many modules that are at different stages of development.
Furthermore, we require multiple build systems and platforms to build
all our supported native clients. I think we are getting to the point
where we need reorganize the svn repository a little so that when we
do a main ActiveMQ release, our src distro just includes the things
that are being built / tested in the main ActiveMQ build.
So.. the reorg would look something like:
/incubator/activemq/trunk/sandbox - > /incubator/activemq/sandbox
/incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-dotnet - >
/incubator/activemq/activemq-dotnet/trunk
/incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-cpp - >
/incubator/activemq/activemq-cpp/trunk
/incubator/activemq/trunk/cms - > /incubator/activemq/cms/trunk
/incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-c - > /incubator/activemq/openwire-c/trunk
/incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-cpp - >
/incubator/activemq/openwire-cpp/trunk
/incubator/activemq/trunk/amazon - > /incubator/activemq/amazon/trunk
/incubator/activemq/trunk/activeio - > /incubator/activemq/activeio/trunk
/incubator/activemq/trunk/activecluster - >
/incubator/activemq/activecluster/trunk
/incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-jmeter - >
/incubator/activemq/activemq-jmeter/trunk
/incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-gram-plugin - >
/incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-gram-plugin
/incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
/incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
/incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
/incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
And finally.. to keep a consistent
/incubator/activemq/${project}/trunk structure...
/incubator/activemq/trunk -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/trunk
/incubator/activemq/tags -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/tags
/incubator/activemq/branches -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/branches
What do you guys think? Am i missing anything that should also get
moved? When do you think would be a good time for the re-org?
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Re: SVN Repository Reorganization
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 9/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Perhaps we should put all the c/c++ stuff together??? I think that
> would make it simpler to merge implementations and share ideas.
Sounds fine with me.
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: SVN Repository Reorganization
Posted by nmittler <na...@gmail.com>.
+1 for reorganizing
+1 for putting all the C++ clients together in their own trunk
I would also suggest getting rid of the CMS project altogether - this has
been replaced by activemq-cpp
tabish121 wrote:
>
>
> +1 for reorg, getting a bit cluttered now.
>
> I don't know that I'd really like to shove all the c/c++ clients into one
> branch, some of them don't have much if any activity, so I don't know if
> I'd like to drag all the extra baggage along for each release. Then
> again, having them all in one place would make it easy for someone to see
> all the available options and try them out to see which one works best for
> them.
>
>
> Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps we should put all the c/c++ stuff together??? I think that
>> would make it simpler to merge implementations and share ideas.
>>
>> On 9/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Everybody,
>>>
>>> The ActiveMQ project has been growing tremendously and our source tree
>>> now has many modules that are at different stages of development.
>>> Furthermore, we require multiple build systems and platforms to build
>>> all our supported native clients. I think we are getting to the point
>>> where we need reorganize the svn repository a little so that when we
>>> do a main ActiveMQ release, our src distro just includes the things
>>> that are being built / tested in the main ActiveMQ build.
>>>
>>> So.. the reorg would look something like:
>>>
>>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/sandbox - > /incubator/activemq/sandbox
>>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-dotnet - >
>>> /incubator/activemq/activemq-dotnet/trunk
>>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-cpp - >
>>> /incubator/activemq/activemq-cpp/trunk
>>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/cms - > /incubator/activemq/cms/trunk
>>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-c - >
>>> /incubator/activemq/openwire-c/trunk
>>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-cpp - >
>>> /incubator/activemq/openwire-cpp/trunk
>>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/amazon - > /incubator/activemq/amazon/trunk
>>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activeio - >
>>> /incubator/activemq/activeio/trunk
>>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activecluster - >
>>> /incubator/activemq/activecluster/trunk
>>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-jmeter - >
>>> /incubator/activemq/activemq-jmeter/trunk
>>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-gram-plugin - >
>>> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-gram-plugin
>>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
>>> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
>>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
>>> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
>>>
>>> And finally.. to keep a consistent
>>> /incubator/activemq/${project}/trunk structure...
>>> /incubator/activemq/trunk -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/trunk
>>> /incubator/activemq/tags -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/tags
>>> /incubator/activemq/branches -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/branches
>>>
>>> What do you guys think? Am i missing anything that should also get
>>> moved? When do you think would be a good time for the re-org?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Hiram
>>>
>>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SVN-Repository-Reorganization-tf2221183.html#a6172870
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
Re: SVN Repository Reorganization
Posted by tabish121 <Ti...@Sensis.com>.
+1 for reorg, getting a bit cluttered now.
I don't know that I'd really like to shove all the c/c++ clients into one
branch, some of them don't have much if any activity, so I don't know if I'd
like to drag all the extra baggage along for each release. Then again,
having them all in one place would make it easy for someone to see all the
available options and try them out to see which one works best for them.
Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
> Perhaps we should put all the c/c++ stuff together??? I think that
> would make it simpler to merge implementations and share ideas.
>
> On 9/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> The ActiveMQ project has been growing tremendously and our source tree
>> now has many modules that are at different stages of development.
>> Furthermore, we require multiple build systems and platforms to build
>> all our supported native clients. I think we are getting to the point
>> where we need reorganize the svn repository a little so that when we
>> do a main ActiveMQ release, our src distro just includes the things
>> that are being built / tested in the main ActiveMQ build.
>>
>> So.. the reorg would look something like:
>>
>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/sandbox - > /incubator/activemq/sandbox
>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-dotnet - >
>> /incubator/activemq/activemq-dotnet/trunk
>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-cpp - >
>> /incubator/activemq/activemq-cpp/trunk
>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/cms - > /incubator/activemq/cms/trunk
>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-c - >
>> /incubator/activemq/openwire-c/trunk
>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-cpp - >
>> /incubator/activemq/openwire-cpp/trunk
>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/amazon - > /incubator/activemq/amazon/trunk
>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activeio - > /incubator/activemq/activeio/trunk
>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activecluster - >
>> /incubator/activemq/activecluster/trunk
>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-jmeter - >
>> /incubator/activemq/activemq-jmeter/trunk
>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-gram-plugin - >
>> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-gram-plugin
>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
>> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
>> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
>> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
>>
>> And finally.. to keep a consistent
>> /incubator/activemq/${project}/trunk structure...
>> /incubator/activemq/trunk -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/trunk
>> /incubator/activemq/tags -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/tags
>> /incubator/activemq/branches -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/branches
>>
>> What do you guys think? Am i missing anything that should also get
>> moved? When do you think would be a good time for the re-org?
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SVN-Repository-Reorganization-tf2221183.html#a6172736
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
Re: SVN Repository Reorganization
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Perhaps we should put all the c/c++ stuff together??? I think that
would make it simpler to merge implementations and share ideas.
On 9/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> The ActiveMQ project has been growing tremendously and our source tree
> now has many modules that are at different stages of development.
> Furthermore, we require multiple build systems and platforms to build
> all our supported native clients. I think we are getting to the point
> where we need reorganize the svn repository a little so that when we
> do a main ActiveMQ release, our src distro just includes the things
> that are being built / tested in the main ActiveMQ build.
>
> So.. the reorg would look something like:
>
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/sandbox - > /incubator/activemq/sandbox
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-dotnet - >
> /incubator/activemq/activemq-dotnet/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-cpp - >
> /incubator/activemq/activemq-cpp/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/cms - > /incubator/activemq/cms/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-c - > /incubator/activemq/openwire-c/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-cpp - >
> /incubator/activemq/openwire-cpp/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/amazon - > /incubator/activemq/amazon/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activeio - > /incubator/activemq/activeio/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activecluster - >
> /incubator/activemq/activecluster/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-jmeter - >
> /incubator/activemq/activemq-jmeter/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-gram-plugin - >
> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-gram-plugin
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
>
> And finally.. to keep a consistent
> /incubator/activemq/${project}/trunk structure...
> /incubator/activemq/trunk -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/tags -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/tags
> /incubator/activemq/branches -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/branches
>
> What do you guys think? Am i missing anything that should also get
> moved? When do you think would be a good time for the re-org?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Re: SVN Repository Reorganization
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
+1, though i wonder if we should do that post graduation, else
we will have to bother the incubator PMC with a released of the
maven-bundle-plugin for example.
On 9/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Everybody,
>
> The ActiveMQ project has been growing tremendously and our source tree
> now has many modules that are at different stages of development.
> Furthermore, we require multiple build systems and platforms to build
> all our supported native clients. I think we are getting to the point
> where we need reorganize the svn repository a little so that when we
> do a main ActiveMQ release, our src distro just includes the things
> that are being built / tested in the main ActiveMQ build.
>
> So.. the reorg would look something like:
>
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/sandbox - > /incubator/activemq/sandbox
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-dotnet - >
> /incubator/activemq/activemq-dotnet/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-cpp - >
> /incubator/activemq/activemq-cpp/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/cms - > /incubator/activemq/cms/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-c - >
> /incubator/activemq/openwire-c/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-cpp - >
> /incubator/activemq/openwire-cpp/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/amazon - > /incubator/activemq/amazon/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activeio - > /incubator/activemq/activeio/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activecluster - >
> /incubator/activemq/activecluster/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-jmeter - >
> /incubator/activemq/activemq-jmeter/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-gram-plugin - >
> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-gram-plugin
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
>
> And finally.. to keep a consistent
> /incubator/activemq/${project}/trunk structure...
> /incubator/activemq/trunk -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/tags -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/tags
> /incubator/activemq/branches -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/branches
>
> What do you guys think? Am i missing anything that should also get
> moved? When do you think would be a good time for the re-org?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: SVN Repository Reorganization
Posted by Nathan Mittler <na...@gmail.com>.
Looks good!
On 9/7/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
> ok. reorg done. Let me know if you seen anything out of place.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
Regards,
Nate
Re: SVN Repository Reorganization
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
ok. reorg done. Let me know if you seen anything out of place.
On 9/7/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Ok.
>
> Nobody objected to the reorg. Soo.. I'm going to start moving things
> around in a little bit (in case you want to know what there are so
> many scm emails flying about).
>
> On 9/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > Hi Everybody,
> >
> > The ActiveMQ project has been growing tremendously and our source tree
> > now has many modules that are at different stages of development.
> > Furthermore, we require multiple build systems and platforms to build
> > all our supported native clients. I think we are getting to the point
> > where we need reorganize the svn repository a little so that when we
> > do a main ActiveMQ release, our src distro just includes the things
> > that are being built / tested in the main ActiveMQ build.
> >
> > So.. the reorg would look something like:
> >
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/sandbox - > /incubator/activemq/sandbox
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-dotnet - >
> > /incubator/activemq/activemq-dotnet/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-cpp - >
> > /incubator/activemq/activemq-cpp/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/cms - > /incubator/activemq/cms/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-c - > /incubator/activemq/openwire-c/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-cpp - >
> > /incubator/activemq/openwire-cpp/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/amazon - > /incubator/activemq/amazon/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activeio - > /incubator/activemq/activeio/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activecluster - >
> > /incubator/activemq/activecluster/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-jmeter - >
> > /incubator/activemq/activemq-jmeter/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-gram-plugin - >
> > /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-gram-plugin
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> > /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> > /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
> >
> > And finally.. to keep a consistent
> > /incubator/activemq/${project}/trunk structure...
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/tags -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/tags
> > /incubator/activemq/branches -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/branches
> >
> > What do you guys think? Am i missing anything that should also get
> > moved? When do you think would be a good time for the re-org?
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Re: SVN Repository Reorganization
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Ok.
Nobody objected to the reorg. Soo.. I'm going to start moving things
around in a little bit (in case you want to know what there are so
many scm emails flying about).
On 9/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> The ActiveMQ project has been growing tremendously and our source tree
> now has many modules that are at different stages of development.
> Furthermore, we require multiple build systems and platforms to build
> all our supported native clients. I think we are getting to the point
> where we need reorganize the svn repository a little so that when we
> do a main ActiveMQ release, our src distro just includes the things
> that are being built / tested in the main ActiveMQ build.
>
> So.. the reorg would look something like:
>
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/sandbox - > /incubator/activemq/sandbox
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-dotnet - >
> /incubator/activemq/activemq-dotnet/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-cpp - >
> /incubator/activemq/activemq-cpp/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/cms - > /incubator/activemq/cms/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-c - > /incubator/activemq/openwire-c/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-cpp - >
> /incubator/activemq/openwire-cpp/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/amazon - > /incubator/activemq/amazon/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activeio - > /incubator/activemq/activeio/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activecluster - >
> /incubator/activemq/activecluster/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-jmeter - >
> /incubator/activemq/activemq-jmeter/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-gram-plugin - >
> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-gram-plugin
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
>
> And finally.. to keep a consistent
> /incubator/activemq/${project}/trunk structure...
> /incubator/activemq/trunk -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/tags -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/tags
> /incubator/activemq/branches -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/branches
>
> What do you guys think? Am i missing anything that should also get
> moved? When do you think would be a good time for the re-org?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Re: SVN Repository Reorganization
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 9/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Good point.. we can clean that last bit of the broker and client when
> the project graduates. Since it will force us to move url anyways.
Good call.
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: SVN Repository Reorganization
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Good point.. we can clean that last bit of the broker and client when
the project graduates. Since it will force us to move url anyways.
On 9/5/06, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm all for cleaning things up - though I'd hate to break the zillions
> of snippet macros littered throughout the wiki showing example
> snippets of code or xml configuration etc.
>
> How about we keep the Java broker & client where it is, move the
> tooling (maven and otherwise) out to a separate area and the other
> clients like C/C++/C# to a different place so they can be released
> separately as required etc?
>
>
> On 9/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > Hi Everybody,
> >
> > The ActiveMQ project has been growing tremendously and our source tree
> > now has many modules that are at different stages of development.
> > Furthermore, we require multiple build systems and platforms to build
> > all our supported native clients. I think we are getting to the point
> > where we need reorganize the svn repository a little so that when we
> > do a main ActiveMQ release, our src distro just includes the things
> > that are being built / tested in the main ActiveMQ build.
> >
> > So.. the reorg would look something like:
> >
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/sandbox - > /incubator/activemq/sandbox
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-dotnet - >
> > /incubator/activemq/activemq-dotnet/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-cpp - >
> > /incubator/activemq/activemq-cpp/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/cms - > /incubator/activemq/cms/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-c - > /incubator/activemq/openwire-c/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-cpp - >
> > /incubator/activemq/openwire-cpp/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/amazon - > /incubator/activemq/amazon/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activeio - > /incubator/activemq/activeio/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activecluster - >
> > /incubator/activemq/activecluster/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-jmeter - >
> > /incubator/activemq/activemq-jmeter/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-gram-plugin - >
> > /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-gram-plugin
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> > /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> > /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
> >
> > And finally.. to keep a consistent
> > /incubator/activemq/${project}/trunk structure...
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/tags -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/tags
> > /incubator/activemq/branches -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/branches
> >
> > What do you guys think? Am i missing anything that should also get
> > moved? When do you think would be a good time for the re-org?
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >
>
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Re: SVN Repository Reorganization
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
I'm all for cleaning things up - though I'd hate to break the zillions
of snippet macros littered throughout the wiki showing example
snippets of code or xml configuration etc.
How about we keep the Java broker & client where it is, move the
tooling (maven and otherwise) out to a separate area and the other
clients like C/C++/C# to a different place so they can be released
separately as required etc?
On 9/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> The ActiveMQ project has been growing tremendously and our source tree
> now has many modules that are at different stages of development.
> Furthermore, we require multiple build systems and platforms to build
> all our supported native clients. I think we are getting to the point
> where we need reorganize the svn repository a little so that when we
> do a main ActiveMQ release, our src distro just includes the things
> that are being built / tested in the main ActiveMQ build.
>
> So.. the reorg would look something like:
>
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/sandbox - > /incubator/activemq/sandbox
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-dotnet - >
> /incubator/activemq/activemq-dotnet/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-cpp - >
> /incubator/activemq/activemq-cpp/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/cms - > /incubator/activemq/cms/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-c - > /incubator/activemq/openwire-c/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-cpp - >
> /incubator/activemq/openwire-cpp/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/amazon - > /incubator/activemq/amazon/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activeio - > /incubator/activemq/activeio/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activecluster - >
> /incubator/activemq/activecluster/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-jmeter - >
> /incubator/activemq/activemq-jmeter/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-gram-plugin - >
> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-gram-plugin
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
>
> And finally.. to keep a consistent
> /incubator/activemq/${project}/trunk structure...
> /incubator/activemq/trunk -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/tags -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/tags
> /incubator/activemq/branches -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/branches
>
> What do you guys think? Am i missing anything that should also get
> moved? When do you think would be a good time for the re-org?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: SVN Repository Reorganization
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Since most of those snippet macros are pointed into the java stuff.
I'm going to leave that trunk stuff where it currently is. No point
in breaking the links 2 times. We can move the upon graduation. We
will just live with a less than consistent repo layout until then.
On 9/6/06, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1. Since all the snippet macro URLs will break anyway post
> graduation, lets reorganise then.
>
> On 9/6/06, Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 from me!
> > cheers,
> >
> > Rob
> > On 5 Sep 2006, at 15:47, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Everybody,
> > >
> > > The ActiveMQ project has been growing tremendously and our source tree
> > > now has many modules that are at different stages of development.
> > > Furthermore, we require multiple build systems and platforms to build
> > > all our supported native clients. I think we are getting to the point
> > > where we need reorganize the svn repository a little so that when we
> > > do a main ActiveMQ release, our src distro just includes the things
> > > that are being built / tested in the main ActiveMQ build.
> > >
> > > So.. the reorg would look something like:
> > >
> > > /incubator/activemq/trunk/sandbox - > /incubator/activemq/sandbox
> > > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-dotnet - >
> > > /incubator/activemq/activemq-dotnet/trunk
> > > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-cpp - >
> > > /incubator/activemq/activemq-cpp/trunk
> > > /incubator/activemq/trunk/cms - > /incubator/activemq/cms/trunk
> > > /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-c - > /incubator/activemq/
> > > openwire-c/trunk
> > > /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-cpp - >
> > > /incubator/activemq/openwire-cpp/trunk
> > > /incubator/activemq/trunk/amazon - > /incubator/activemq/amazon/trunk
> > > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activeio - > /incubator/activemq/activeio/
> > > trunk
> > > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activecluster - >
> > > /incubator/activemq/activecluster/trunk
> > > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-jmeter - >
> > > /incubator/activemq/activemq-jmeter/trunk
> > > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-gram-plugin - >
> > > /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-gram-plugin
> > > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> > > /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
> > > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> > > /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
> > >
> > > And finally.. to keep a consistent
> > > /incubator/activemq/${project}/trunk structure...
> > > /incubator/activemq/trunk -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/trunk
> > > /incubator/activemq/tags -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/tags
> > > /incubator/activemq/branches -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/branches
> > >
> > > What do you guys think? Am i missing anything that should also get
> > > moved? When do you think would be a good time for the re-org?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Hiram
> > >
> > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Re: SVN Repository Reorganization
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1. Since all the snippet macro URLs will break anyway post
graduation, lets reorganise then.
On 9/6/06, Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 from me!
> cheers,
>
> Rob
> On 5 Sep 2006, at 15:47, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
> > Hi Everybody,
> >
> > The ActiveMQ project has been growing tremendously and our source tree
> > now has many modules that are at different stages of development.
> > Furthermore, we require multiple build systems and platforms to build
> > all our supported native clients. I think we are getting to the point
> > where we need reorganize the svn repository a little so that when we
> > do a main ActiveMQ release, our src distro just includes the things
> > that are being built / tested in the main ActiveMQ build.
> >
> > So.. the reorg would look something like:
> >
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/sandbox - > /incubator/activemq/sandbox
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-dotnet - >
> > /incubator/activemq/activemq-dotnet/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-cpp - >
> > /incubator/activemq/activemq-cpp/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/cms - > /incubator/activemq/cms/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-c - > /incubator/activemq/
> > openwire-c/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-cpp - >
> > /incubator/activemq/openwire-cpp/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/amazon - > /incubator/activemq/amazon/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activeio - > /incubator/activemq/activeio/
> > trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activecluster - >
> > /incubator/activemq/activecluster/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-jmeter - >
> > /incubator/activemq/activemq-jmeter/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-gram-plugin - >
> > /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-gram-plugin
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> > /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> > /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
> >
> > And finally.. to keep a consistent
> > /incubator/activemq/${project}/trunk structure...
> > /incubator/activemq/trunk -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/trunk
> > /incubator/activemq/tags -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/tags
> > /incubator/activemq/branches -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/branches
> >
> > What do you guys think? Am i missing anything that should also get
> > moved? When do you think would be a good time for the re-org?
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
>
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: SVN Repository Reorganization
Posted by Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me!
cheers,
Rob
On 5 Sep 2006, at 15:47, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> The ActiveMQ project has been growing tremendously and our source tree
> now has many modules that are at different stages of development.
> Furthermore, we require multiple build systems and platforms to build
> all our supported native clients. I think we are getting to the point
> where we need reorganize the svn repository a little so that when we
> do a main ActiveMQ release, our src distro just includes the things
> that are being built / tested in the main ActiveMQ build.
>
> So.. the reorg would look something like:
>
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/sandbox - > /incubator/activemq/sandbox
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-dotnet - >
> /incubator/activemq/activemq-dotnet/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-cpp - >
> /incubator/activemq/activemq-cpp/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/cms - > /incubator/activemq/cms/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-c - > /incubator/activemq/
> openwire-c/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-cpp - >
> /incubator/activemq/openwire-cpp/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/amazon - > /incubator/activemq/amazon/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activeio - > /incubator/activemq/activeio/
> trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activecluster - >
> /incubator/activemq/activecluster/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-jmeter - >
> /incubator/activemq/activemq-jmeter/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-gram-plugin - >
> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-gram-plugin
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
> /incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-tooling/maven-bundle-plugin - >
> /incubator/activemq/maven-plugins/trunk/maven-bundle-plugin
>
> And finally.. to keep a consistent
> /incubator/activemq/${project}/trunk structure...
> /incubator/activemq/trunk -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/trunk
> /incubator/activemq/tags -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/tags
> /incubator/activemq/branches -> /incubator/activemq/activemq/branches
>
> What do you guys think? Am i missing anything that should also get
> moved? When do you think would be a good time for the re-org?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com