You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@community.apache.org by Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com> on 2012/06/25 14:32:01 UTC
[VOTE] Participate in a GSoC like project
This is an unusual vote in that it is running in parallel to the
DISCUSS thread as a result of external time restraints. It is also
unusual in that I am not likely to be able to leave it running for a
full 72 hours for the same reason (minimum 36 hours, will push as late
as I can). For this reason please feel free to vote -1 if you feel
this is insufficient time to properly evaluate (I've even provided
this as a vote option)
Please see the parallel DISCUSS thread before voting (in particular
note the DISCLOSURE there which means I have a conflict of interest in
this vote and thus will not be voting).
[ ] +1 Agree to sign a non-binding letter of intent to participate in
a GSoC like pilot project as described in this votes DISCUSS thread
[ ] -1 Do not participate in the OSKA pilot project due to limited
time for appropriate consensus building
[ ] -1 Do not sign because ...
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: [VOTE] Participate in a GSoC like project
Posted by Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>.
+ 1 (I believe non-binding)
These may have great long term impact and education motivators for projects.
Suresh
On Jun 25, 2012, at 8:32 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> This is an unusual vote in that it is running in parallel to the
> DISCUSS thread as a result of external time restraints. It is also
> unusual in that I am not likely to be able to leave it running for a
> full 72 hours for the same reason (minimum 36 hours, will push as late
> as I can). For this reason please feel free to vote -1 if you feel
> this is insufficient time to properly evaluate (I've even provided
> this as a vote option)
>
> Please see the parallel DISCUSS thread before voting (in particular
> note the DISCLOSURE there which means I have a conflict of interest in
> this vote and thus will not be voting).
>
> [ ] +1 Agree to sign a non-binding letter of intent to participate in
> a GSoC like pilot project as described in this votes DISCUSS thread
>
> [ ] -1 Do not participate in the OSKA pilot project due to limited
> time for appropriate consensus building
>
> [ ] -1 Do not sign because ...
>
> --
> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
> Programme Leader (Open Development)
> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: [VOTE] Participate in a GSoC like project
Posted by Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com>.
On Jun 25, 2012, at 8:32 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> [ ] +1 Agree to sign a non-binding letter of intent to participate in
> a GSoC like pilot project as described in this votes DISCUSS thread
+1
--
Rich Bowen
rbowen@rcbowen.com
Shosholoza
Re: [VOTE] Participate in a GSoC like project
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
> [X ] +1 Agree to sign a non-binding letter of intent to participate in
> a GSoC like pilot project as described in this votes DISCUSS thread
-Bertrand
Re: [VOTE] Participate in a GSoC like project
Posted by Katherine Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net>.
On
[ X ] +1 Agree to sign a non-binding letter of intent to participate in
a GSoC like pilot project as described in this votes DISCUSS thread
Re: [VOTE] Participate in a GSoC like project
Posted by Marcel Offermans <ma...@luminis.nl>.
+1
Re: [VOTE] Participate in a GSoC like project
Posted by Sagara Gunathunga <sa...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non binding ) We need to try out with new approaches to build
solid open source communities. Hope this program will beneficial for
both students and ASF communities.
Thanks !
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Nóirín Plunkett <no...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Ross Gardler
> <rg...@opendirective.com> wrote:
>> This is an unusual vote in that it is running in parallel to the
>> DISCUSS thread as a result of external time restraints. It is also
>> unusual in that I am not likely to be able to leave it running for a
>> full 72 hours for the same reason (minimum 36 hours, will push as late
>> as I can). For this reason please feel free to vote -1 if you feel
>> this is insufficient time to properly evaluate (I've even provided
>> this as a vote option)
>>
>> Please see the parallel DISCUSS thread before voting (in particular
>> note the DISCLOSURE there which means I have a conflict of interest in
>> this vote and thus will not be voting).
>>
>> [ ] +1 Agree to sign a non-binding letter of intent to participate in
>> a GSoC like pilot project as described in this votes DISCUSS thread
>
> +0.9 - Agree to sign a non-binding letter of intent, but ensure that
> discussion and consensus-building are facilitated before committing to
> actual participation in the OSKA pilot.
>
> That is what "non-binding" means, right? :-)
>
> (And, FWIW, I'm +1 on actual participation in the pilot based on
> what's been described so far, but I'd like us to allow more time for a
> variety of opinions before that decision is made.)
>
> Noirin
--
Sagara Gunathunga
Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
Re: [VOTE] Participate in a GSoC like project
Posted by Nóirín Plunkett <no...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Ross Gardler
<rg...@opendirective.com> wrote:
> This is an unusual vote in that it is running in parallel to the
> DISCUSS thread as a result of external time restraints. It is also
> unusual in that I am not likely to be able to leave it running for a
> full 72 hours for the same reason (minimum 36 hours, will push as late
> as I can). For this reason please feel free to vote -1 if you feel
> this is insufficient time to properly evaluate (I've even provided
> this as a vote option)
>
> Please see the parallel DISCUSS thread before voting (in particular
> note the DISCLOSURE there which means I have a conflict of interest in
> this vote and thus will not be voting).
>
> [ ] +1 Agree to sign a non-binding letter of intent to participate in
> a GSoC like pilot project as described in this votes DISCUSS thread
+0.9 - Agree to sign a non-binding letter of intent, but ensure that
discussion and consensus-building are facilitated before committing to
actual participation in the OSKA pilot.
That is what "non-binding" means, right? :-)
(And, FWIW, I'm +1 on actual participation in the pilot based on
what's been described so far, but I'd like us to allow more time for a
variety of opinions before that decision is made.)
Noirin