[Bug 61737] New: Upgrade MD5Hex Assertion to Digest Assertion

[bu...@apache.org]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737

            Bug ID: 61737
           Summary: Upgrade MD5Hex Assertion to Digest Assertion
           Product: JMeter
           Version: 3.3
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: Main
          Assignee: issues@jmeter.apache.org
          Reporter: orimarko@gmail.com
  Target Milestone: ---

I suggest upgrading MD5Hex Assertion to Digest Assertion 

Currently it only assert using MD5 algorithm, but we can allow other SHA
assertions.
Support similar algorithms as the new __digest function.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 61737] Upgrade MD5Hex Assertion to Digest Assertion

[bu...@apache.org]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737

Philippe Mouawad <p....@ubik-ingenierie.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |p.mouawad@ubik-ingenierie.c
                   |                            |om
             Status|NEW                         |NEEDINFO

--- Comment #1 from Philippe Mouawad <p....@ubik-ingenierie.com> ---
Hello,
Looks like a good idea.
Just to keep backward compatibility , can you proceed the following way if you
intend to submit a patch:

- Keep class name as it but update javadocs and docs
- A select box should provide available algorithm, defaulting to MD5 for
backward compatibility
- I supppose there will be other parameters depending on algorithm
- MD5Hex should become HashHex

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 61737] Upgrade MD5Hex Assertion to Digest Assertion

[bu...@apache.org]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737

--- Comment #2 from Philippe Mouawad <p....@ubik-ingenierie.com> ---
It would also be interesting to make this assertion appliable on Variables

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.