You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@struts.apache.org by "Philip Luppens (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/12/26 13:44:38 UTC
[jira] Created: (WW-2935) Review and update Struts 2 tutorials for
2.1.x release
Review and update Struts 2 tutorials for 2.1.x release
------------------------------------------------------
Key: WW-2935
URL: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2935
Project: Struts 2
Issue Type: Task
Components: Documentation
Reporter: Philip Luppens
Per the comment in the wiki page at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33168 we should review the tutorials before releasing a 2.1.x GA, or we will make a poor impression for new users.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (WW-2935) Review and update Struts 2 tutorials
for 2.1.x release
Posted by "Dave Newton (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=45382#action_45382 ]
Dave Newton commented on WW-2935:
---------------------------------
I've labeled some of the tutorials as my:todo to catch these.
The only thing I'm not sure about is if it's appropriate to have *only* 2.1 tutorials, personally I think we should have 2.0 and 2.1 tutorials which is made more irritating by us not having separate spaces for 2.0/2.1 :/
> Review and update Struts 2 tutorials for 2.1.x release
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WW-2935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2935
> Project: Struts 2
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Documentation
> Reporter: Philip Luppens
>
> Per the comment in the wiki page at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33168 we should review the tutorials before releasing a 2.1.x GA, or we will make a poor impression for new users.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (WW-2935) Review and update Struts 2 tutorials
for 2.1.x release
Posted by "Musachy Barroso (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=45384#action_45384 ]
Musachy Barroso commented on WW-2935:
-------------------------------------
on a second thought, it would probably be better to just get rid of the dojo part, and keep the JPA stuff, and add jquery to the mix.
> Review and update Struts 2 tutorials for 2.1.x release
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WW-2935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2935
> Project: Struts 2
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Documentation
> Reporter: Philip Luppens
>
> Per the comment in the wiki page at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33168 we should review the tutorials before releasing a 2.1.x GA, or we will make a poor impression for new users.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (WW-2935) Review and update Struts 2 tutorials
for 2.1.x release
Posted by "Musachy Barroso (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=45383#action_45383 ]
Musachy Barroso commented on WW-2935:
-------------------------------------
replacing the ajax tags under "s" by "sx" should be enough to get it running again.
> Review and update Struts 2 tutorials for 2.1.x release
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WW-2935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2935
> Project: Struts 2
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Documentation
> Reporter: Philip Luppens
>
> Per the comment in the wiki page at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33168 we should review the tutorials before releasing a 2.1.x GA, or we will make a poor impression for new users.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.