You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by bansalp <bp...@gmail.com> on 2015/01/08 14:46:12 UTC
Using Same persistent store for storing message of virtual topic
and its consumer queue.
Hi,
I am using Multi level Kahadb.
Will there be any problem like duplicate message to a client if I use same
store for virtual topic and its consumer queue?
Thanks,
Pradeep
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Using-Same-persistent-store-for-storing-message-of-virtual-topic-and-its-consumer-queue-tp4689648.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Using Same persistent store for storing message of virtual
topic and its consumer queue.
Posted by bansalp <bp...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the quick reply.
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Using-Same-persistent-store-for-storing-message-of-virtual-topic-and-its-consumer-queue-tp4689648p4689650.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Using Same persistent store for storing message of virtual topic
and its consumer queue.
Posted by Timothy Bish <ta...@gmail.com>.
On 01/08/2015 08:46 AM, bansalp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Multi level Kahadb.
>
> Will there be any problem like duplicate message to a client if I use same
> store for virtual topic and its consumer queue?
>
> Thanks,
> Pradeep
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Using-Same-persistent-store-for-storing-message-of-virtual-topic-and-its-consumer-queue-tp4689648.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
No there should be no overlap here as durable consumers and queues store
their data in different ways in the store.
--
Tim Bish
Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
tim.bish@redhat.com | www.redhat.com
skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/