You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/07/28 19:43:15 UTC
[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1504) SerialChainFilter should use DocSet
API rather then deprecated BitSet API
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12736171#action_12736171 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1504:
--------------------------------------------
Patrick are you going to have time soon to iterate w/ Uwe on this? (He has alot of feedback on the last patch).
Also, it looks like SerialChainFilter is roughly a copy of ChainFilter but with "some improvement to allow a narrowed down filtering" (from the javadocs). Would it be possible to somehow fold that improvement into the original ChainFilter instead?
> SerialChainFilter should use DocSet API rather then deprecated BitSet API
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1504
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1504
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: contrib/spatial
> Reporter: Ryan McKinley
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1504.patch, LUCENE-1504.patch
>
>
> From erik's comments in LUCENE-1387
> * Maybe the Filter's should be using the DocIdSet API rather than the BitSet deprecated stuff? We can refactor that after being committed I supposed, but not something we want to leave like that.
> We should also look at moving SerialChainFilter out of the spatial contrib since it is more generally useful then just spatial search.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org