You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by "R.Smits" <R....@tudelft.nl> on 2008/03/12 16:19:21 UTC
Pyzor and cloudmark
Hello,
Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from cloudmark ?
Is anyone using pyzor ?
We are looking at these add-ons for spamasssassin. Pyzor looks old...
(last version from 2002)
Greetings... Richard Smits
Technical University Delft
Re: Pyzor and cloudmark
Posted by Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.org>.
On Wed, March 12, 2008 16:30, R.Smits wrote:
> I have just discovered DCC .
> Looks a lot better :-)
sure do, we are all here to help later even if it looks good later olso
> Sorry i've asked.
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
RE: Pyzor and cloudmark
Posted by Raymond Dijkxhoorn <ra...@prolocation.net>.
Hi!
>>> I have just discovered DCC .
>>> Looks a lot better :-)
>>
>> they are very different things. I advise using both (or, all three)
>
> Since I witnesed slow responses and timeouts from Pyzor (yes, also with
> the alternative server) I'd only recommend Razor2 and DCC.
>>>> Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from
>>>> cloudmark ?
>>>> Is anyone using pyzor ?
You can run with private Pyzors also, runs just fine.
Bye,
Raymond.
RE: Pyzor and cloudmark
Posted by Rob Sterenborg <R....@netsourcing.nl>.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 12.03.08 16:30, R.Smits wrote:
>> Forget it....
>>
>> I have just discovered DCC .
>> Looks a lot better :-)
>
> they are very different things. I advise using both (or, all three)
Since I witnesed slow responses and timeouts from Pyzor (yes, also with
the alternative server) I'd only recommend Razor2 and DCC.
>>> Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from
>>> cloudmark ?
>>>
>>> Is anyone using pyzor ?
Grts,
Rob
Re: Pyzor and cloudmark
Posted by Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>.
On 12.03.08 16:30, R.Smits wrote:
> Forget it....
>
> I have just discovered DCC .
> Looks a lot better :-)
they are very different things. I advise using both (or, all three)
> > Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from cloudmark ?
> >
> > Is anyone using pyzor ?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Windows 2000: 640 MB ought to be enough for anybody
Re: Pyzor and cloudmark
Posted by "R.Smits" <R....@tudelft.nl>.
Forget it....
I have just discovered DCC .
Looks a lot better :-)
Sorry i've asked.
Greetings...
R.Smits wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from cloudmark ?
>
> Is anyone using pyzor ?
>
> We are looking at these add-ons for spamasssassin. Pyzor looks old...
> (last version from 2002)
>
> Greetings... Richard Smits
> Technical University Delft
Re: Pyzor and cloudmark
Posted by Ben Poliakoff <be...@reed.edu>.
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> [20080313 07:59]:
>
> > > Is anyone using pyzor ?
> >
> > both server and client here yes
>
> looking at it now, I got no PYZOR catches last day :(
FWIW, at our site PYZOR_CHECK fires on about 65% of all of our spam. We
had a total of 7523 hits for PYZOR_CHECK yesterday, just behind
RAZOR2_CHECK and BAYES_99. We use local pyzor servers as well as the
"alternate" public server.
While the pyzor code base hasn't been actively updated lately I think
it's still a very valuable component in a SpamAssassin installation.
Ben
--
________________________________________________________________________
PGP fingerprint: A131 F813 7A0F C5B7 E74D C972 9118 A94D 6AF5 2019
Re: Pyzor and cloudmark
Posted by Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>.
> On Wed, March 12, 2008 16:19, R.Smits wrote:
>
> > Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from cloudmark ?
On 13.03.08 15:44, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> i am unsure if that is not just razor ?
afaik it supports special features of commercial RAZOR version
> > Is anyone using pyzor ?
>
> both server and client here yes
looking at it now, I got no PYZOR catches last day :(
> > We are looking at these add-ons for spamasssassin. Pyzor looks old...
> > (last version from 2002)
>
> could olso just mean its stable
if it works, is securre and does not lead to FN, no problem.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Honk if you love peace and quiet.
Re: Pyzor and cloudmark
Posted by Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.org>.
On Wed, March 12, 2008 16:19, R.Smits wrote:
> Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from cloudmark ?
i am unsure if that is not just razor ?
> Is anyone using pyzor ?
both server and client here yes
> We are looking at these add-ons for spamasssassin. Pyzor looks old...
> (last version from 2002)
could olso just mean its stable
atleast it is here
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098