You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> on 2018/02/06 17:45:38 UTC
Moving the stable pointer to 1.3.1
On the thread "Considering branching for 1.5 and other branch-1 release
planning
" Francis Liu, Zach York, and Ashish Singhi are all in favor of moving the
stable pointer forward, based on production and scale testing. Testing with
1.3 we have done at my place of employment also had a positive result: 1.3
survived aggressive tests where 1.1 and 1.2 did not (at the time).
I believe we have arrived at a consensus, so intend to retarget the stable
pointer to the latest 1.3 release, 1.3.1. After Francis runs the 1.3.2
release, we will move it to 1.3.2.
Please write in with objections or concerns if you have them and I'll hold
off until the discussion is settled (or if there is an objection).
--
Best regards,
Andrew
Re: Moving the stable pointer to 1.3.1
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Good point, we can do that.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:51 AM, Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote:
> If there is an imminent 1.3.2 coming, I'd rather see it go directly there
> instead of pausing at 1.3.1, but otherwise no major concerns.
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On the thread "Considering branching for 1.5 and other branch-1 release
> > planning
> > " Francis Liu, Zach York, and Ashish Singhi are all in favor of moving
> the
> > stable pointer forward, based on production and scale testing. Testing
> with
> > 1.3 we have done at my place of employment also had a positive result:
> 1.3
> > survived aggressive tests where 1.1 and 1.2 did not (at the time).
> >
> > I believe we have arrived at a consensus, so intend to retarget the
> stable
> > pointer to the latest 1.3 release, 1.3.1. After Francis runs the 1.3.2
> > release, we will move it to 1.3.2.
> >
> >
> > Please write in with objections or concerns if you have them and I'll
> hold
> > off until the discussion is settled (or if there is an objection).
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew
> >
>
--
Best regards,
Andrew
Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
decrepit hands
- A23, Crosstalk
Re: Moving the stable pointer to 1.3.1
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Good point, we can do that.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:51 AM, Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote:
> If there is an imminent 1.3.2 coming, I'd rather see it go directly there
> instead of pausing at 1.3.1, but otherwise no major concerns.
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On the thread "Considering branching for 1.5 and other branch-1 release
> > planning
> > " Francis Liu, Zach York, and Ashish Singhi are all in favor of moving
> the
> > stable pointer forward, based on production and scale testing. Testing
> with
> > 1.3 we have done at my place of employment also had a positive result:
> 1.3
> > survived aggressive tests where 1.1 and 1.2 did not (at the time).
> >
> > I believe we have arrived at a consensus, so intend to retarget the
> stable
> > pointer to the latest 1.3 release, 1.3.1. After Francis runs the 1.3.2
> > release, we will move it to 1.3.2.
> >
> >
> > Please write in with objections or concerns if you have them and I'll
> hold
> > off until the discussion is settled (or if there is an objection).
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew
> >
>
--
Best regards,
Andrew
Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
decrepit hands
- A23, Crosstalk
Re: Moving the stable pointer to 1.3.1
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
+1 to what Mike proposed.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:51 AM, Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote:
> If there is an imminent 1.3.2 coming, I'd rather see it go directly there
> instead of pausing at 1.3.1, but otherwise no major concerns.
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On the thread "Considering branching for 1.5 and other branch-1 release
> > planning
> > " Francis Liu, Zach York, and Ashish Singhi are all in favor of moving
> the
> > stable pointer forward, based on production and scale testing. Testing
> with
> > 1.3 we have done at my place of employment also had a positive result:
> 1.3
> > survived aggressive tests where 1.1 and 1.2 did not (at the time).
> >
> > I believe we have arrived at a consensus, so intend to retarget the
> stable
> > pointer to the latest 1.3 release, 1.3.1. After Francis runs the 1.3.2
> > release, we will move it to 1.3.2.
> >
> >
> > Please write in with objections or concerns if you have them and I'll
> hold
> > off until the discussion is settled (or if there is an objection).
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew
> >
>
Re: Moving the stable pointer to 1.3.1
Posted by Mike Drob <md...@apache.org>.
If there is an imminent 1.3.2 coming, I'd rather see it go directly there
instead of pausing at 1.3.1, but otherwise no major concerns.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> On the thread "Considering branching for 1.5 and other branch-1 release
> planning
> " Francis Liu, Zach York, and Ashish Singhi are all in favor of moving the
> stable pointer forward, based on production and scale testing. Testing with
> 1.3 we have done at my place of employment also had a positive result: 1.3
> survived aggressive tests where 1.1 and 1.2 did not (at the time).
>
> I believe we have arrived at a consensus, so intend to retarget the stable
> pointer to the latest 1.3 release, 1.3.1. After Francis runs the 1.3.2
> release, we will move it to 1.3.2.
>
>
> Please write in with objections or concerns if you have them and I'll hold
> off until the discussion is settled (or if there is an objection).
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrew
>
Re: Moving the stable pointer to 1.3.1
Posted by Mike Drob <md...@apache.org>.
If there is an imminent 1.3.2 coming, I'd rather see it go directly there
instead of pausing at 1.3.1, but otherwise no major concerns.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> On the thread "Considering branching for 1.5 and other branch-1 release
> planning
> " Francis Liu, Zach York, and Ashish Singhi are all in favor of moving the
> stable pointer forward, based on production and scale testing. Testing with
> 1.3 we have done at my place of employment also had a positive result: 1.3
> survived aggressive tests where 1.1 and 1.2 did not (at the time).
>
> I believe we have arrived at a consensus, so intend to retarget the stable
> pointer to the latest 1.3 release, 1.3.1. After Francis runs the 1.3.2
> release, we will move it to 1.3.2.
>
>
> Please write in with objections or concerns if you have them and I'll hold
> off until the discussion is settled (or if there is an objection).
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrew
>