You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@logging.apache.org by Mikael Ståldal <mi...@apache.org> on 2017/12/19 20:35:54 UTC

[Log4j] Incorrect information about markers in SLF4J documentation

I just realized that the documentation for SLF4J contain incorrect 
information about markers:

https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#marker_interface
https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#fatal

It says that only Logback support markers, while in fact Log4j 2 also 
supports it.

Maybe we should report a bug? https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#fatal

Re: [Log4j] Incorrect information about markers in SLF4J documentation

Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.

On Dec 19, 2017 14:15, "Ralph Goers" <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:

Yes, that is indeed incorrect and should be reported.


Good catch! Yes, please do report it, providing a patch would be best.

Gary


Ralph

> On Dec 19, 2017, at 1:35 PM, Mikael Ståldal <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I just realized that the documentation for SLF4J contain incorrect
information about markers:
>
> https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#marker_interface
> https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#fatal
>
> It says that only Logback support markers, while in fact Log4j 2 also
supports it.
>
> Maybe we should report a bug? https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#fatal
>

Re: [Log4j] Incorrect information about markers in SLF4J documentation

Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.

Yes, that is indeed incorrect and should be reported.

Ralph

> On Dec 19, 2017, at 1:35 PM, Mikael Ståldal <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> I just realized that the documentation for SLF4J contain incorrect information about markers:
> 
> https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#marker_interface
> https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#fatal
> 
> It says that only Logback support markers, while in fact Log4j 2 also supports it.
> 
> Maybe we should report a bug? https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#fatal
>