You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by rh...@apache.org on 2010/03/22 21:40:08 UTC
svn commit: r926322 - /subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
Author: rhuijben
Date: Mon Mar 22 20:40:08 2010
New Revision: 926322
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=926322&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Nominate a followup of the r896915 patch
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
Modified: subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?rev=926322&r1=926321&r2=926322&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS Mon Mar 22 20:40:08 2010
@@ -105,6 +105,20 @@ Candidate changes:
without conflict.
Votes:
+1: kameshj
+
+ * r908980, r908981
+ This followup on r896915, makes sure that the Windows specific remove
+ readonly attribute code still works on FAT32 filesystems. (The FAT32
+ driver reports a very different error than the NTFS driver)
+ Justification:
+ Without this patch, users using a USB stick formatted with this
+ filesystem will see 'file exists' errors on some working copy
+ operations. (This patch should have been part of the r896915
+ group). I certainly don't recommend using FAT32 to host a
+ subversion working copy. But AnkhSVN reports show that it is a
+ common user scenario.
+ Votes:
+ +1: rhuijben
* r916286, r917512
This backport depends on the r878590 group only for the conflict free port.