You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Marcus Olsson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/02/23 15:28:18 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-11215) Reference leak with parallel repairs on the same table

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15158958#comment-15158958 ] 

Marcus Olsson commented on CASSANDRA-11215:
-------------------------------------------

It seems that this issue is caused by not accepting parallel repairs on the same sstables anymore, where it throws a RuntimeException if that happens and fails to release the previously acquired references.

I'm currently working on a patch for this.

> Reference leak with parallel repairs on the same table
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-11215
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11215
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Marcus Olsson
>            Assignee: Marcus Olsson
>
> When starting multiple repairs on the same table Cassandra starts to log about reference leak as:
> {noformat}
> ERROR [Reference-Reaper:1] 2016-02-23 15:02:05,516 Ref.java:187 - LEAK DETECTED: a reference (org.apache.cassandra.utils.concurrent.Ref$State@5213f926) to class org.apache.cassandra.io.sstable.format.SSTableReader
> $InstanceTidier@605893242:.../testrepair/standard1-dcf311a0da3411e5a5c0c1a39c091431/la-30-big was not released before the reference was garbage collected
> {noformat}
> Reproducible with:
> {noformat}
> ccm create repairtest -v 2.2.5 -n 3
> ccm start
> ccm stress write n=1000000 -schema replication(strategy=SimpleStrategy,factor=3) keyspace=testrepair
> # And then perform two repairs concurrently with:
> ccm node1 nodetool repair testrepair
> {noformat}
> I know that starting multiple repairs in parallel on the same table isn't very wise, but this shouldn't result in reference leaks.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)