sigh

[Karl Fogel <kf...@newton.ch.collab.net>]

Sorry, I mistakenly thought we'd already fixed `svnlook' to not do
massive diffs when copying an entire tree.  How wrong I was. :-(

I have undone the tags i was making for the 0.10.X series.  They're
useless anyway.  The revision numbers in the CHANGES file are what we
should use; the tags are just asking for trouble (for example, when
someone runs "svn diff" on a tag revision).

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: sigh

[Karl Fogel <kf...@newton.ch.collab.net>]

cmpilato@collab.net writes:
> My.  Gosh.  That hurt over 56k (glad I was out to eat when that came
> crawling over my cnxn).
> 
> So, um, who's gonna mod the commit-email.pl script to only pay
> attention to the trunk/ subdirectory as a short-term solution?
> Karl? :-)

That is an *excellent* idea.

And to answer your question: me. :-)

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: sigh

[cm...@collab.net]

Karl Fogel <kf...@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:

> Sorry, I mistakenly thought we'd already fixed `svnlook' to not do
> massive diffs when copying an entire tree.  How wrong I was. :-(

My.  Gosh.  That hurt over 56k (glad I was out to eat when that came
crawling over my cnxn).

So, um, who's gonna mod the commit-email.pl script to only pay
attention to the trunk/ subdirectory as a short-term solution?
Karl? :-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org