You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@empire-db.apache.org by Francis De Brabandere <fr...@gmail.com> on 2009/06/27 23:40:20 UTC
Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
Since we are creating our first maven release and nexus makes this
process a lot simpler I would like to call a vote on this:
see this jira issue where I added a subtask:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896
As described in the issue, adding a subtask to that issue requires a
vote on the mailing list.
More info here:
http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html
http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html
There is also the staging documentation in the Nexus book:
http://www.sonatype.com/books/nexus-book/reference/staging.html
[ ] yes, use nexus deployment
[ ] no, ...
--
http://www.somatik.be
Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] Re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Francis De
Brabandere<fr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll be using the more correct way in the future.
>
> But I have to say that I don't always know when a vote is binding, is
> there explained somewhere for what kind of vote which kind of votes
> are binding or non-binding?
>
> Francis
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Martijn
> Dashorst<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Technically you're right, but even though sometimes we like red tape,
>> consensus based working is better. If a community is voting for
>> everything and doing everything according to red tape rules, it is not
>> working according to the Apache way.
>>
>> There's the absolute minimum decorum for official, binding events, such as:
>> - releases
>> - new committers
>> - new pmc members
>>
>> As far as I know, these are the official pieces where a vote is
>> required. How you write down the tally, is not too important, as long
>> as you keep track of binding and non-binding votes when it matters
>> (i.e. for the 3 topics a minimum of +3 binding votes is required).
>> When inside the incubator, the rules are the same, but the binding
>> votes are those of the Incubator PMC members, not the PPMC, which is
>> why it is adamant to have 3 mentors (they are your 3 binding votes)
>>
>> Everything else is self-inflicted red tape :)
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Rainer Döbele<do...@esteam.de> wrote:
>>> Hello everybody,
>>>
>>> the final result of our vote for using the Apache Nexus repositiory is:
>>>
>>> +1 votes: 3
>>> 0 votes: 0
>>> -1 votes: 0
>>>
>>> The minimum requirement of 3 votes with no -1 votes has been meet.
>>> The proposal is hereby accepted.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Rainer
>>>
>>>
>>> @Francis: this is - as far as I know - the correct way to close a vote.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>>>> Re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
>>>>
>>>> Vote closed:
>>>>
>>>> We have 3 positive votes an noboy voted against.
>>>>
>>>> I'll update the INFRA issue.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Rainer Döbele<do...@esteam.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Hello everyone,
>>>> >
>>>> > Since we've got the three +1 votes required (Francis, Jörg and I), we
>>>> should consider closing the vote and tell the nexus guys to go ahead.
>>>> >
>>>> > BTW: I have now removed the "under construction" sign from our
>>>> Wikipedia page.
>>>> >
>>>> > Rainer
>>>> >
>>>> > Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>>>> >> re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Since we are creating our first maven release and nexus makes this
>>>> >> process a lot simpler I would like to call a vote on this:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> see this jira issue where I added a subtask:
>>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896
>>>> >>
>>>> >> As described in the issue, adding a subtask to that issue requires a
>>>> >> vote on the mailing list.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> More info here:
>>>> >> http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html
>>>> >> http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html
>>>> >>
>>>> >> There is also the staging documentation in the Nexus book:
>>>> >> http://www.sonatype.com/books/nexus-book/reference/staging.html
>>>> >>
>>>> >> [ ] yes, use nexus deployment
>>>> >> [ ] no, ...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> http://www.somatik.be
>>>> >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://www.somatik.be
>>>> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.somatik.be
> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] Re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
Posted by Francis De Brabandere <fr...@gmail.com>.
I'll be using the more correct way in the future.
But I have to say that I don't always know when a vote is binding, is
there explained somewhere for what kind of vote which kind of votes
are binding or non-binding?
Francis
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Martijn
Dashorst<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Technically you're right, but even though sometimes we like red tape,
> consensus based working is better. If a community is voting for
> everything and doing everything according to red tape rules, it is not
> working according to the Apache way.
>
> There's the absolute minimum decorum for official, binding events, such as:
> - releases
> - new committers
> - new pmc members
>
> As far as I know, these are the official pieces where a vote is
> required. How you write down the tally, is not too important, as long
> as you keep track of binding and non-binding votes when it matters
> (i.e. for the 3 topics a minimum of +3 binding votes is required).
> When inside the incubator, the rules are the same, but the binding
> votes are those of the Incubator PMC members, not the PPMC, which is
> why it is adamant to have 3 mentors (they are your 3 binding votes)
>
> Everything else is self-inflicted red tape :)
>
> Martijn
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Rainer Döbele<do...@esteam.de> wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> the final result of our vote for using the Apache Nexus repositiory is:
>>
>> +1 votes: 3
>> 0 votes: 0
>> -1 votes: 0
>>
>> The minimum requirement of 3 votes with no -1 votes has been meet.
>> The proposal is hereby accepted.
>>
>> Regards
>> Rainer
>>
>>
>> @Francis: this is - as far as I know - the correct way to close a vote.
>>
>>
>>
>> Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>>> Re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
>>>
>>> Vote closed:
>>>
>>> We have 3 positive votes an noboy voted against.
>>>
>>> I'll update the INFRA issue.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Rainer Döbele<do...@esteam.de>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hello everyone,
>>> >
>>> > Since we've got the three +1 votes required (Francis, Jörg and I), we
>>> should consider closing the vote and tell the nexus guys to go ahead.
>>> >
>>> > BTW: I have now removed the "under construction" sign from our
>>> Wikipedia page.
>>> >
>>> > Rainer
>>> >
>>> > Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>>> >> re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
>>> >>
>>> >> Since we are creating our first maven release and nexus makes this
>>> >> process a lot simpler I would like to call a vote on this:
>>> >>
>>> >> see this jira issue where I added a subtask:
>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896
>>> >>
>>> >> As described in the issue, adding a subtask to that issue requires a
>>> >> vote on the mailing list.
>>> >>
>>> >> More info here:
>>> >> http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html
>>> >> http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html
>>> >>
>>> >> There is also the staging documentation in the Nexus book:
>>> >> http://www.sonatype.com/books/nexus-book/reference/staging.html
>>> >>
>>> >> [ ] yes, use nexus deployment
>>> >> [ ] no, ...
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> http://www.somatik.be
>>> >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.somatik.be
>>> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
>
--
http://www.somatik.be
Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] Re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
Technically you're right, but even though sometimes we like red tape,
consensus based working is better. If a community is voting for
everything and doing everything according to red tape rules, it is not
working according to the Apache way.
There's the absolute minimum decorum for official, binding events, such as:
- releases
- new committers
- new pmc members
As far as I know, these are the official pieces where a vote is
required. How you write down the tally, is not too important, as long
as you keep track of binding and non-binding votes when it matters
(i.e. for the 3 topics a minimum of +3 binding votes is required).
When inside the incubator, the rules are the same, but the binding
votes are those of the Incubator PMC members, not the PPMC, which is
why it is adamant to have 3 mentors (they are your 3 binding votes)
Everything else is self-inflicted red tape :)
Martijn
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Rainer Döbele<do...@esteam.de> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> the final result of our vote for using the Apache Nexus repositiory is:
>
> +1 votes: 3
> 0 votes: 0
> -1 votes: 0
>
> The minimum requirement of 3 votes with no -1 votes has been meet.
> The proposal is hereby accepted.
>
> Regards
> Rainer
>
>
> @Francis: this is - as far as I know - the correct way to close a vote.
>
>
>
> Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>> Re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
>>
>> Vote closed:
>>
>> We have 3 positive votes an noboy voted against.
>>
>> I'll update the INFRA issue.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Rainer Döbele<do...@esteam.de>
>> wrote:
>> > Hello everyone,
>> >
>> > Since we've got the three +1 votes required (Francis, Jörg and I), we
>> should consider closing the vote and tell the nexus guys to go ahead.
>> >
>> > BTW: I have now removed the "under construction" sign from our
>> Wikipedia page.
>> >
>> > Rainer
>> >
>> > Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>> >> re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
>> >>
>> >> Since we are creating our first maven release and nexus makes this
>> >> process a lot simpler I would like to call a vote on this:
>> >>
>> >> see this jira issue where I added a subtask:
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896
>> >>
>> >> As described in the issue, adding a subtask to that issue requires a
>> >> vote on the mailing list.
>> >>
>> >> More info here:
>> >> http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html
>> >> http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html
>> >>
>> >> There is also the staging documentation in the Nexus book:
>> >> http://www.sonatype.com/books/nexus-book/reference/staging.html
>> >>
>> >> [ ] yes, use nexus deployment
>> >> [ ] no, ...
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> http://www.somatik.be
>> >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.somatik.be
>> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
[VOTE RESULTS] Re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
Posted by Rainer Döbele <do...@esteam.de>.
Hello everybody,
the final result of our vote for using the Apache Nexus repositiory is:
+1 votes: 3
0 votes: 0
-1 votes: 0
The minimum requirement of 3 votes with no -1 votes has been meet.
The proposal is hereby accepted.
Regards
Rainer
@Francis: this is - as far as I know - the correct way to close a vote.
Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> Re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
>
> Vote closed:
>
> We have 3 positive votes an noboy voted against.
>
> I'll update the INFRA issue.
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Rainer Döbele<do...@esteam.de>
> wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Since we've got the three +1 votes required (Francis, Jörg and I), we
> should consider closing the vote and tell the nexus guys to go ahead.
> >
> > BTW: I have now removed the "under construction" sign from our
> Wikipedia page.
> >
> > Rainer
> >
> > Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> >> re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
> >>
> >> Since we are creating our first maven release and nexus makes this
> >> process a lot simpler I would like to call a vote on this:
> >>
> >> see this jira issue where I added a subtask:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896
> >>
> >> As described in the issue, adding a subtask to that issue requires a
> >> vote on the mailing list.
> >>
> >> More info here:
> >> http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html
> >> http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html
> >>
> >> There is also the staging documentation in the Nexus book:
> >> http://www.sonatype.com/books/nexus-book/reference/staging.html
> >>
> >> [ ] yes, use nexus deployment
> >> [ ] no, ...
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://www.somatik.be
> >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.somatik.be
> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
Re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
Posted by Francis De Brabandere <fr...@gmail.com>.
Vote closed:
We have 3 positive votes an noboy voted against.
I'll update the INFRA issue.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Rainer Döbele<do...@esteam.de> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Since we've got the three +1 votes required (Francis, Jörg and I), we should consider closing the vote and tell the nexus guys to go ahead.
>
> BTW: I have now removed the "under construction" sign from our Wikipedia page.
>
> Rainer
>
> Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>> re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
>>
>> Since we are creating our first maven release and nexus makes this
>> process a lot simpler I would like to call a vote on this:
>>
>> see this jira issue where I added a subtask:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896
>>
>> As described in the issue, adding a subtask to that issue requires a
>> vote on the mailing list.
>>
>> More info here:
>> http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html
>> http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html
>>
>> There is also the staging documentation in the Nexus book:
>> http://www.sonatype.com/books/nexus-book/reference/staging.html
>>
>> [ ] yes, use nexus deployment
>> [ ] no, ...
>>
>> --
>> http://www.somatik.be
>> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>
--
http://www.somatik.be
Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
Posted by Rainer Döbele <do...@esteam.de>.
Hello everyone,
Since we've got the three +1 votes required (Francis, Jörg and I), we should consider closing the vote and tell the nexus guys to go ahead.
BTW: I have now removed the "under construction" sign from our Wikipedia page.
Rainer
Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
>
> Since we are creating our first maven release and nexus makes this
> process a lot simpler I would like to call a vote on this:
>
> see this jira issue where I added a subtask:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896
>
> As described in the issue, adding a subtask to that issue requires a
> vote on the mailing list.
>
> More info here:
> http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html
> http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html
>
> There is also the staging documentation in the Nexus book:
> http://www.sonatype.com/books/nexus-book/reference/staging.html
>
> [ ] yes, use nexus deployment
> [ ] no, ...
>
> --
> http://www.somatik.be
> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
Posted by Jörg Reiher <re...@esteam.de>.
+1
Joerg Reiher
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
from: Francis De Brabandere [mailto:francisdb@gmail.com]
date: Sa 27.06.2009 23:40
to: empire-db-dev@incubator.apache.org
subject: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
Since we are creating our first maven release and nexus makes this
process a lot simpler I would like to call a vote on this:
see this jira issue where I added a subtask:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896
As described in the issue, adding a subtask to that issue requires a
vote on the mailing list.
More info here:
http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html
http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html
There is also the staging documentation in the Nexus book:
http://www.sonatype.com/books/nexus-book/reference/staging.html
[ ] yes, use nexus deployment
[ ] no, ...
--
http://www.somatik.be
Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
Posted by Rainer Döbele <do...@esteam.de>.
+1
Rainer
Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> Re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
>
> +1
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Francis De
> Brabandere<fr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Since we are creating our first maven release and nexus makes this
> > process a lot simpler I would like to call a vote on this:
> >
> > see this jira issue where I added a subtask:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896
> >
> > As described in the issue, adding a subtask to that issue requires a
> > vote on the mailing list.
> >
> > More info here:
> > http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html
> > http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html
> >
> > There is also the staging documentation in the Nexus book:
> > http://www.sonatype.com/books/nexus-book/reference/staging.html
> >
> > [ ] yes, use nexus deployment
> > [ ] no, ...
> >
> > --
> > http://www.somatik.be
> > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.somatik.be
> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
Re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository?
Posted by Francis De Brabandere <fr...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Francis De
Brabandere<fr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since we are creating our first maven release and nexus makes this
> process a lot simpler I would like to call a vote on this:
>
> see this jira issue where I added a subtask:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896
>
> As described in the issue, adding a subtask to that issue requires a
> vote on the mailing list.
>
> More info here:
> http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html
> http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html
>
> There is also the staging documentation in the Nexus book:
> http://www.sonatype.com/books/nexus-book/reference/staging.html
>
> [ ] yes, use nexus deployment
> [ ] no, ...
>
> --
> http://www.somatik.be
> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>
--
http://www.somatik.be
Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.