You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com> on 2005/03/29 10:50:45 UTC
Re: svn commit: r159356 - httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
trawick@apache.org wrote:
> Author: trawick
> Date: Tue Mar 29 00:44:53 2005
> New Revision: 159356
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=159356
> Log:
> sync with 2.0.54-dev
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES?view=diff&r1=159355&r2=159356
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES Tue Mar 29 00:44:53 2005
> @@ -57,10 +57,6 @@
> *) Only recompile buildmark.c when we have to relink httpd.
> [Justin Erenkrantz]
>
> - *) Remove formatting characters from ap_log_error() calls. These
> - were escaped as fallout from CAN-2003-0020.
> - [Eric Covener <ecovener gmail.com>]
> -
> *) mod_cache: Fix up handling of revalidated responses.
> [Justin Erenkrantz]
>
> @@ -630,6 +626,10 @@
> Apache 2.0.xx tree as documented, and except as noted, below.]
>
> Changes with Apache 2.0.54
> +
> + *) Remove formatting characters from ap_log_error() calls. These
> + were escaped as fallout from CAN-2003-0020.
> + [Eric Covener <ecovener gmail.com>]
>
> *) htdigest: Fix permissions of created files. PR 33765. [Joe Orton]
I don't think we should remove entries from the 2.1.x Changes anymore.
Since there are real changes between patch releases of 2.1.x, removing
this changes entry means that someone upgrading from 2.1.2 would not see
this one listed.
I think from now on, items should be listed in both 2.1.x and 2.0.x.
On a different matter, should truncating the CHANGES be considered for
trunk? Eg, only show changes since 2.0 or even 2.1.0? (At a minimum,
cut out all the old old old old changes in 1.3..)
-Paul
Re: svn commit: r159356 - httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
Posted by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:50:45 -0800, Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com> wrote:
>
>>trawick@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>>Author: trawick
>>>Date: Tue Mar 29 00:44:53 2005
>>>New Revision: 159356
>>>
>>>URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=159356
>>>Log:
>>>sync with 2.0.54-dev
>>>
>>>Modified:
>>> httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
>>>
>>>Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
>>>URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES?view=diff&r1=159355&r2=159356
>>>==============================================================================
>>>--- httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES (original)
>>>+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES Tue Mar 29 00:44:53 2005
>>>@@ -57,10 +57,6 @@
>>> *) Only recompile buildmark.c when we have to relink httpd.
>>> [Justin Erenkrantz]
>>>
>>>- *) Remove formatting characters from ap_log_error() calls. These
>>>- were escaped as fallout from CAN-2003-0020.
>>>- [Eric Covener <ecovener gmail.com>]
>>>-
>>> *) mod_cache: Fix up handling of revalidated responses.
>>> [Justin Erenkrantz]
>>>
>>>@@ -630,6 +626,10 @@
>>> Apache 2.0.xx tree as documented, and except as noted, below.]
>>>
>>> Changes with Apache 2.0.54
>>>+
>>>+ *) Remove formatting characters from ap_log_error() calls. These
>>>+ were escaped as fallout from CAN-2003-0020.
>>>+ [Eric Covener <ecovener gmail.com>]
>>>
>>> *) htdigest: Fix permissions of created files. PR 33765. [Joe Orton]
>>
>>I don't think we should remove entries from the 2.1.x Changes anymore.
>>
>>Since there are real changes between patch releases of 2.1.x, removing
>>this changes entry means that someone upgrading from 2.1.2 would not see
>>this one listed.
>>
>>I think from now on, items should be listed in both 2.1.x and 2.0.x.
>
>
> I had assumed we would do this when 2.2 became GA...
+1
Bill
Re: svn commit: r159356 - httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:50:45 -0800, Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com> wrote:
> trawick@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: trawick
> > Date: Tue Mar 29 00:44:53 2005
> > New Revision: 159356
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=159356
> > Log:
> > sync with 2.0.54-dev
> >
> > Modified:
> > httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
> >
> > Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES?view=diff&r1=159355&r2=159356
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES (original)
> > +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES Tue Mar 29 00:44:53 2005
> > @@ -57,10 +57,6 @@
> > *) Only recompile buildmark.c when we have to relink httpd.
> > [Justin Erenkrantz]
> >
> > - *) Remove formatting characters from ap_log_error() calls. These
> > - were escaped as fallout from CAN-2003-0020.
> > - [Eric Covener <ecovener gmail.com>]
> > -
> > *) mod_cache: Fix up handling of revalidated responses.
> > [Justin Erenkrantz]
> >
> > @@ -630,6 +626,10 @@
> > Apache 2.0.xx tree as documented, and except as noted, below.]
> >
> > Changes with Apache 2.0.54
> > +
> > + *) Remove formatting characters from ap_log_error() calls. These
> > + were escaped as fallout from CAN-2003-0020.
> > + [Eric Covener <ecovener gmail.com>]
> >
> > *) htdigest: Fix permissions of created files. PR 33765. [Joe Orton]
>
> I don't think we should remove entries from the 2.1.x Changes anymore.
>
> Since there are real changes between patch releases of 2.1.x, removing
> this changes entry means that someone upgrading from 2.1.2 would not see
> this one listed.
>
> I think from now on, items should be listed in both 2.1.x and 2.0.x.
I had assumed we would do this when 2.2 became GA... I have no strong
opinion on exactly when it happens.
> On a different matter, should truncating the CHANGES be considered for
> trunk? Eg, only show changes since 2.0 or even 2.1.0? (At a minimum,
> cut out all the old old old old changes in 1.3..)
shrug... that's the declaration that many of those old contributions
are part of even the latest level of Apache...