You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Nick Gilbert <ni...@nickgilbert.com> on 2005/05/10 10:43:27 UTC
Re: Difference in scores between spamc and spamassassin [RESOLVED]
>> Surely they should both give exactly the same result?
>
> Maybe.. Depends a LOT on the options you pass to spamd when you start it.
Yes you're right - there's an error in the scripts on Bill Shupps
shupp.org site which I used to make my box - it was calling spamd with
-L for some reason. I expect someone turned it on for debugging and
forgot to remove it again.
Thanks!
Nick...
Re: Difference in scores between spamc and spamassassin [RESOLVED]
Posted by Matt Kettler <mk...@evi-inc.com>.
Nick Gilbert wrote:
>>>Surely they should both give exactly the same result?
>>>
>>>
>>Maybe.. Depends a LOT on the options you pass to spamd when you start it.
>>
>>
>
>Yes you're right - there's an error in the scripts on Bill Shupps
>shupp.org site which I used to make my box - it was calling spamd with
>-L for some reason. I expect someone turned it on for debugging and
>forgot to remove it again.
>
Well, some people do prefer to run it that way... You get some
substantial speed benefits by doing so, but your accuracy suffers.