You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Yuepeng Pan <pa...@apache.org> on 2026/07/07 16:45:10 UTC
[VOTE] Release flink-connector-jdbc v3.4.0, release candidate #3
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on release candidate #3 for
flink-connector-jdbc v3.4.0, as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
* the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
[2], which are signed with the key with fingerprint B5B638DCA5F94E4A
[3],
* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
* source code tag v3.4.0-rc3 [5],
* website pull request listing the new release [6].
* CI build of the tag [7][8].
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
Thanks,
Yuepeng Pan
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12356738
[2]
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-connector-jdbc-3.4.0-rc3
[3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
[4]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/flink/flink-connector-jdbc/3.4.0-1.20/
[5] https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/releases/tag/v3.4.0-rc3
[6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/869
[7] https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/actions/runs/28875672551
[8] https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/actions/runs/28875669459
Re: [VOTE] Release flink-connector-jdbc v3.4.0, release candidate #3
Posted by Yuepeng Pan <pa...@apache.org>.
Thanks João and everyone involved in the rc voting.
BTW, The voting was cancelled due to [1]
[1] https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/pull/209
Thanks,
Yuepeng Pan
João Boto <es...@apache.org> 于2026年7月9日周四 23:47写道:
> Hi,
>
> I agree, also as that module is not released we are ok..
>
> On 2026/07/09 11:06:25 Yuepeng Pan wrote:
> > HI, João.
> >
> > Thanks for your comments.
> >
> > IIUC, since we’re only one release away from completing the multi-module
> > migration, it may be a good idea to plan the removal in the next release
> > cycle.
> >
> > WDYTA ?
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Yuepeng Pan
> >
> >
> > João Boto <es...@apache.org> 于2026年7月9日周四 06:12写道:
> >
> > > This module was originally a safety net to check backward compatibility
> > > during our multi-module migration.
> > >
> > > I mentioned back then that we could eventually delete it. Since it
> doesn't
> > > follow our current setup principles (like being in the parent POM).
> > >
> > > Should we double-check if it's still providing any real value, or are
> we
> > > good to remove it now?
> > >
> > > Best
> > >
> > > On 2026/07/08 05:06:25 Yuepeng Pan wrote:
> > > > Thanks Weiqing for the catch and PRs.
> > > > I'm not entirely sure whether this warrants a mandatory fix and a
> new RC.
> > > > Please let's hold off for now and wait for some comments from other
> dev
> > > > members.
> > > >
> > > > And I'll process the PRs.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Yuepeng Pan
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release flink-connector-jdbc v3.4.0, release candidate #3
Posted by João Boto <es...@apache.org>.
Hi,
I agree, also as that module is not released we are ok..
On 2026/07/09 11:06:25 Yuepeng Pan wrote:
> HI, João.
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> IIUC, since we’re only one release away from completing the multi-module
> migration, it may be a good idea to plan the removal in the next release
> cycle.
>
> WDYTA ?
>
>
> Best,
> Yuepeng Pan
>
>
> João Boto <es...@apache.org> 于2026年7月9日周四 06:12写道:
>
> > This module was originally a safety net to check backward compatibility
> > during our multi-module migration.
> >
> > I mentioned back then that we could eventually delete it. Since it doesn't
> > follow our current setup principles (like being in the parent POM).
> >
> > Should we double-check if it's still providing any real value, or are we
> > good to remove it now?
> >
> > Best
> >
> > On 2026/07/08 05:06:25 Yuepeng Pan wrote:
> > > Thanks Weiqing for the catch and PRs.
> > > I'm not entirely sure whether this warrants a mandatory fix and a new RC.
> > > Please let's hold off for now and wait for some comments from other dev
> > > members.
> > >
> > > And I'll process the PRs.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Yuepeng Pan
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release flink-connector-jdbc v3.4.0, release candidate #3
Posted by Yuepeng Pan <pa...@apache.org>.
HI, João.
Thanks for your comments.
IIUC, since we’re only one release away from completing the multi-module
migration, it may be a good idea to plan the removal in the next release
cycle.
WDYTA ?
Best,
Yuepeng Pan
João Boto <es...@apache.org> 于2026年7月9日周四 06:12写道:
> This module was originally a safety net to check backward compatibility
> during our multi-module migration.
>
> I mentioned back then that we could eventually delete it. Since it doesn't
> follow our current setup principles (like being in the parent POM).
>
> Should we double-check if it's still providing any real value, or are we
> good to remove it now?
>
> Best
>
> On 2026/07/08 05:06:25 Yuepeng Pan wrote:
> > Thanks Weiqing for the catch and PRs.
> > I'm not entirely sure whether this warrants a mandatory fix and a new RC.
> > Please let's hold off for now and wait for some comments from other dev
> > members.
> >
> > And I'll process the PRs.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yuepeng Pan
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release flink-connector-jdbc v3.4.0, release candidate #3
Posted by João Boto <es...@apache.org>.
This module was originally a safety net to check backward compatibility during our multi-module migration.
I mentioned back then that we could eventually delete it. Since it doesn't follow our current setup principles (like being in the parent POM).
Should we double-check if it's still providing any real value, or are we good to remove it now?
Best
On 2026/07/08 05:06:25 Yuepeng Pan wrote:
> Thanks Weiqing for the catch and PRs.
> I'm not entirely sure whether this warrants a mandatory fix and a new RC.
> Please let's hold off for now and wait for some comments from other dev
> members.
>
> And I'll process the PRs.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Yuepeng Pan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release flink-connector-jdbc v3.4.0, release candidate #3
Posted by Chanhae Oh <dh...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Yuepeng.
First of all, thank you for leading the release.
I would also like to thank Weiqing for identifying the issue.
In my opinion, while this isn't a critical issue that would block the
release, it should be included in the main branch.
How about we create a Jira ticket for this issue right away and proceed
with the current release separately?
Thanks,
Chanhae Oh
On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 2:07 PM Yuepeng Pan <pa...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks Weiqing for the catch and PRs.
> I'm not entirely sure whether this warrants a mandatory fix and a new RC.
> Please let's hold off for now and wait for some comments from other dev
> members.
>
> And I'll process the PRs.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Yuepeng Pan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release flink-connector-jdbc v3.4.0, release candidate #3
Posted by Yuepeng Pan <pa...@apache.org>.
Thanks Weiqing for the catch and PRs.
I'm not entirely sure whether this warrants a mandatory fix and a new RC.
Please let's hold off for now and wait for some comments from other dev
members.
And I'll process the PRs.
Thanks,
Yuepeng Pan
Re: [VOTE] Release flink-connector-jdbc v3.4.0, release candidate #3
Posted by Weiqing Yang <ya...@gmail.com>.
Hi Yuepeng,
Thanks for driving the release. One minor, pre-existing thing I hit while
verifying RC3:
The flink-connector-jdbc-backward-compatibility module ships two files
missing the Apache license header: pom.xml and DynamicTableSourceTest.java.
CI doesn't catch it because the module sits outside the parent pom's
<modules>, so RAT never scans it. It was the same in 3.3.0, so it's not a
regression and doesn't affect the artifacts. (PRs created to fix it: maste
<https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/pull/205>, v4.1
<https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/pull/206>, v3.4
<https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/pull/207>)
My read is this doesn't need an RC respin, but wanted to check how you'd
prefer to handle it.
Best,
Weiqing
On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 9:45 AM Yuepeng Pan <pa...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please review and vote on release candidate #3 for
>
> flink-connector-jdbc v3.4.0, as follows:
>
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
>
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>
> * JIRA release notes [1],
>
> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
>
> [2], which are signed with the key with fingerprint B5B638DCA5F94E4A
>
> [3],
>
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>
> * source code tag v3.4.0-rc3 [5],
>
> * website pull request listing the new release [6].
>
> * CI build of the tag [7][8].
>
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>
> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yuepeng Pan
>
>
>
> [1]
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12356738
>
> [2]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-connector-jdbc-3.4.0-rc3
>
> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>
> [4]
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/flink/flink-connector-jdbc/3.4.0-1.20/
>
> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/releases/tag/v3.4.0-rc3
>
> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/869
>
> [7]
> https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/actions/runs/28875672551
>
> [8]
> https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/actions/runs/28875669459
>