[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10266) invalid assumptions about doc order in TestPointFields - possibly masking real bug in {{DatePointField}} ?

["Cao Manh Dat (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15905994#comment-15905994 ] 

Cao Manh Dat commented on SOLR-10266:
-------------------------------------

@Hoss : Sure!

> invalid assumptions about doc order in TestPointFields - possibly masking real bug in {{DatePointField}} ?
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-10266
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10266
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>         Attachments: SOLR-10266.patch
>
>
> There are a bunch of places in TestPointFields where {{assertQ()}} is used to verify that many docs match a query and have particular values -- but because of how the XPath expressions are written there are implicit assumptions about the order of the docs matching the order they were added to the index, which isn't always garunteed depending on the randomized merge policy that might be used.
> while fixing this, i also uncovered what _appears_ to be a more serious bug with {{DatePointField}} function sorting (either that, or a badly written test) that we need to get to the bottom of.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org