You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/11/07 17:19:12 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6980) Parallel Flushing Of Memstores [89-fb]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13492466#comment-13492466 ] 

Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-6980:
---------------------------------------

Since this was committed to 89-fb should this issue be resolved? Looks like forward porting would be addressed by HBASE-6466.
                
> Parallel Flushing Of Memstores [89-fb]
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6980
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6980
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Kannan Muthukkaruppan
>            Assignee: Kannan Muthukkaruppan
>             Fix For: 0.89-fb
>
>
> For write dominated workloads, single threaded memstore flushing is an unnecessary bottleneck. With a single flusher thread, we are basically not setup to take advantage of the aggregate throughput that multi-disk nodes provide.
> * For puts with WAL enabled, the bottleneck is more likely the "single" WAL per region server. So this particular fix may not buy as much unless we unlock that bottleneck with multiple commit logs per region server. (Topic for a separate JIRA-- HBASE-6981).
> * But for puts with WAL disabled (e.g., when using HBASE-5783 style fast bulk imports), we should be able to support much better ingest rates with parallel flushing of memstores.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira