Re: VERIFIED status in Bugzilla (was: [Bug 41697]...)

[Konstantin Kolinko <kn...@gmail.com>]

2012/1/8  <bu...@apache.org>:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41697
>
> Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> changed:
>
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>             Status|VERIFIED                    |CLOSED
>
> --- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> 2012-01-08 12:55:56 UTC ---
> Marked as closed rather than verified since verified indicates an open,
> confirmed bug. This will remove this issue from the weekly bug reports.
>

I think the above quoted comment was just a typo, but it might be
better to clarify:

VERIFIED means that the *resolution* has been confirmed by OP or by QA person.

A "confirmed bug" term just sounds like a synonym for "confirmed
problem". It is not what should be meant here.

Here are docs:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/page.cgi?id=fields.html#status


I think there is no much sense in having VERIFIED bugs in our weekly
reports, but it is just a reminder that they have to be promoted to
CLOSED, like Mark did.

Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org