You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Konrad Windszus <ko...@gmx.de> on 2019/08/20 11:42:58 UTC

CI environment

Hi,
the information at https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/continuous-integration.html seems pretty outdated.
On the ASF Jenkins I could not find too many CI jobs either (some related to Oak, https://builds.apache.org/view/AllJobs/).

I would like to set up Jobs for Jackrabbit Filevault and Jackrabbit Filevault Maven Plugin. The latter requires also a Windows build job (we faced several Windows only issues in the past).
Also it would be nice to have a dedicated view in Jenkins for Apache Jackrabbit which contains all Jobs for Oak, Jackrabbit and Filevault.
Is there any reference documentation around the set up of CI jobs at Jackrabbit?
Also I could not find any Jenkinsfile anywhere so I guess the Jenkins Jobs are currently maintained manually?
Or should I instead rather use Travis?

Thanks for your input.
Konrad

Re: CI environment

Posted by Konrad Windszus <ko...@gmx.de>.

Now that Github Actions are generally available (https://github.com/features/actions <https://github.com/features/actions>) I would rather invest in this than leveraging the ASF Jenkins due to issues with building 3rd party PRs.
For that I would need to be added to the repository collaborators group. 
My github user is added to the ASF Github organization and I actually have rights to create workflows e.g. in https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl/actions/new <https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl/actions/new> but not in https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin <https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin>.
Any idea what rights are missing?

Thanks,
Konrad

> On 21. Aug 2019, at 08:47, Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Konrad,
> 
> The jobs have been created manually and they do not use a Jenkinsfile.
> But I agree, it would be good to change that.
> 
> I just added you to the hudson-jobadmin group. You should now be able
> to create jobs on Jenkins.
> 
> Regards
> Marcel
> 
> On 20.08.19, 16:54, "Konrad Windszus" <ko...@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>    Hi,
>    Instead of configuring it manually I would prefer using Jenkinsfiles for it. Do you have any good example at hand or are all other Jackrabbit Jenkins Jobs manually configured?
>    Usually one uses a Shared Library for setting the jobs up (e.g. compare with https://github.com/apache/sling-tooling-jenkins)
>    Also who is currently Jenkins admin (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Jenkins#Jenkins-HowdoIgetanaccount)?
> 
> 
>    Can you grant me the according rights or set up Jobs for http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/commons/filevault/ and http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/commons/filevault-package-maven-plugin/?
>    Both should be built with Java 7, 8, and 11 both on Windows and Linux.
>    Thanks in advance,
>    Konrad
> 
> 
>    On 20. Aug 2019, at 15:58, Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
>    Hi,
> 
>    Travis is nice because it integrates well with GitHub, but there were issues
>    in the past with notification emails sent to the list by travis. It required
>    constant moderation. It looks like this has just very recently been fixed.
>    What a coincidence :)
> 
>    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18843
> 
>    I'd say use the Apache infrastructure if possible, but if travis better fits
>    your requirements, then it's fine as well.
> 
>    Regards
>    Marcel
> 
>    On 20.08.19, 13:48, "Konrad Windszus" <ko...@gmx.de> wrote:
>       According to https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/523a8dbfbf6fa4cef6d98c5e25770a9f8e8525de3781516d031c068a@%3Cprivate.infra.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/523a8dbfbf6fa4cef6d98c5e25770a9f8e8525de3781516d031c068a@<private.infra.apache.org>>
>     it
>        seems wise nowadays to primarily rely on Travis to also enable builds on PRs.
>       WDYT?
> 
> 
>       On 20. Aug 2019, at 13:42, Konrad Windszus <ko...@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>       Hi,
>       the information at 
>       https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/continuous-integration.html <https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/continuous-integration.html> seems pretty outdated.
>       On the ASF Jenkins I could not find too many CI jobs either (some related to Oak,
>       https://builds.apache.org/view/AllJobs/).
> 
>       I would like to set up Jobs for Jackrabbit Filevault and Jackrabbit Filevault Maven Plugin. The latter requires also a Windows build job (we faced several Windows only issues in the past).
>       Also it would be nice to have a dedicated view in Jenkins for Apache Jackrabbit which contains all Jobs for Oak, Jackrabbit and Filevault.
>       Is there any reference documentation around the set up of CI jobs at Jackrabbit?
>       Also I could not find any Jenkinsfile anywhere so I guess the Jenkins Jobs are currently maintained manually?
>       Or should I instead rather use Travis?
> 
>       Thanks for your input.
>       Konrad
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Re: CI environment

Posted by Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com>.

Hi Konrad,

The jobs have been created manually and they do not use a Jenkinsfile.
But I agree, it would be good to change that.

I just added you to the hudson-jobadmin group. You should now be able
to create jobs on Jenkins.

Regards
Marcel

On 20.08.19, 16:54, "Konrad Windszus" <ko...@gmx.de> wrote:

Hi,
Instead of configuring it manually I would prefer using Jenkinsfiles for it. Do you have any good example at hand or are all other Jackrabbit Jenkins Jobs manually configured?
Usually one uses a Shared Library for setting the jobs up (e.g. compare with https://github.com/apache/sling-tooling-jenkins)
Also who is currently Jenkins admin (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Jenkins#Jenkins-HowdoIgetanaccount)?

Can you grant me the according rights or set up Jobs for http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/commons/filevault/ and http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/commons/filevault-package-maven-plugin/?
Both should be built with Java 7, 8, and 11 both on Windows and Linux.
Thanks in advance,
Konrad

On 20. Aug 2019, at 15:58, Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com> wrote:

Hi,

Travis is nice because it integrates well with GitHub, but there were issues
in the past with notification emails sent to the list by travis. It required
constant moderation. It looks like this has just very recently been fixed.
What a coincidence :)

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18843

I'd say use the Apache infrastructure if possible, but if travis better fits
your requirements, then it's fine as well.

Regards
Marcel

On 20.08.19, 13:48, "Konrad Windszus" <ko...@gmx.de> wrote:
According to https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/523a8dbfbf6fa4cef6d98c5e25770a9f8e8525de3781516d031c068a@%3Cprivate.infra.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/523a8dbfbf6fa4cef6d98c5e25770a9f8e8525de3781516d031c068a@<private.infra.apache.org>>
it
seems wise nowadays to primarily rely on Travis to also enable builds on PRs.
WDYT?

On 20. Aug 2019, at 13:42, Konrad Windszus <ko...@gmx.de> wrote:

Hi,
the information at
https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/continuous-integration.html <https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/continuous-integration.html> seems pretty outdated.
On the ASF Jenkins I could not find too many CI jobs either (some related to Oak,
https://builds.apache.org/view/AllJobs/).

I would like to set up Jobs for Jackrabbit Filevault and Jackrabbit Filevault Maven Plugin. The latter requires also a Windows build job (we faced several Windows only issues in the past).
Also it would be nice to have a dedicated view in Jenkins for Apache Jackrabbit which contains all Jobs for Oak, Jackrabbit and Filevault.
Is there any reference documentation around the set up of CI jobs at Jackrabbit?
Also I could not find any Jenkinsfile anywhere so I guess the Jenkins Jobs are currently maintained manually?
Or should I instead rather use Travis?

Thanks for your input.
Konrad

Re: CI environment

Posted by Konrad Windszus <ko...@gmx.de>.

Hi,
Instead of configuring it manually I would prefer using Jenkinsfiles for it. Do you have any good example at hand or are all other Jackrabbit Jenkins Jobs manually configured?
Usually one uses a Shared Library for setting the jobs up (e.g. compare with https://github.com/apache/sling-tooling-jenkins <https://github.com/apache/sling-tooling-jenkins>)
Also who is currently Jenkins admin (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Jenkins#Jenkins-HowdoIgetanaccount <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Jenkins#Jenkins-HowdoIgetanaccount>)?

Can you grant me the according rights or set up Jobs for http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/commons/filevault/ <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/commons/filevault/> and http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/commons/filevault-package-maven-plugin/? <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/commons/filevault-package-maven-plugin/?>
Both should be built with Java 7, 8, and 11 both on Windows and Linux.
Thanks in advance,
Konrad

> On 20. Aug 2019, at 15:58, Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Travis is nice because it integrates well with GitHub, but there were issues
> in the past with notification emails sent to the list by travis. It required
> constant moderation. It looks like this has just very recently been fixed.
> What a coincidence :)
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18843
> 
> I'd say use the Apache infrastructure if possible, but if travis better fits
> your requirements, then it's fine as well.
> 
> Regards
> Marcel
> 
> On 20.08.19, 13:48, "Konrad Windszus" <ko...@gmx.de> wrote:
>    According to https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/523a8dbfbf6fa4cef6d98c5e25770a9f8e8525de3781516d031c068a@%3Cprivate.infra.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/523a8dbfbf6fa4cef6d98c5e25770a9f8e8525de3781516d031c068a@<private.infra.apache.org>> it
>     seems wise nowadays to primarily rely on Travis to also enable builds on PRs.
>    WDYT?
> 
> 
>    On 20. Aug 2019, at 13:42, Konrad Windszus <ko...@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>    Hi,
>    the information at 
>    https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/continuous-integration.html <https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/continuous-integration.html> seems pretty outdated.
>    On the ASF Jenkins I could not find too many CI jobs either (some related to Oak,
>    https://builds.apache.org/view/AllJobs/).
> 
>    I would like to set up Jobs for Jackrabbit Filevault and Jackrabbit Filevault Maven Plugin. The latter requires also a Windows build job (we faced several Windows only issues in the past).
>    Also it would be nice to have a dedicated view in Jenkins for Apache Jackrabbit which contains all Jobs for Oak, Jackrabbit and Filevault.
>    Is there any reference documentation around the set up of CI jobs at Jackrabbit?
>    Also I could not find any Jenkinsfile anywhere so I guess the Jenkins Jobs are currently maintained manually?
>    Or should I instead rather use Travis?
> 
>    Thanks for your input.
>    Konrad
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Re: CI environment

Posted by Konrad Windszus <ko...@gmx.de>.

I asked INFRA to enable Travis builds on both FileVault repos in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19438 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19438>.
Konrad

> On 20. Aug 2019, at 15:58, Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Travis is nice because it integrates well with GitHub, but there were issues
> in the past with notification emails sent to the list by travis. It required
> constant moderation. It looks like this has just very recently been fixed.
> What a coincidence :)
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18843
> 
> I'd say use the Apache infrastructure if possible, but if travis better fits
> your requirements, then it's fine as well.
> 
> Regards
> Marcel
> 
> On 20.08.19, 13:48, "Konrad Windszus" <ko...@gmx.de> wrote:
>    According to https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/523a8dbfbf6fa4cef6d98c5e25770a9f8e8525de3781516d031c068a@%3Cprivate.infra.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/523a8dbfbf6fa4cef6d98c5e25770a9f8e8525de3781516d031c068a@<private.infra.apache.org>> it
>     seems wise nowadays to primarily rely on Travis to also enable builds on PRs.
>    WDYT?
> 
> 
>    On 20. Aug 2019, at 13:42, Konrad Windszus <ko...@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>    Hi,
>    the information at 
>    https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/continuous-integration.html <https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/continuous-integration.html> seems pretty outdated.
>    On the ASF Jenkins I could not find too many CI jobs either (some related to Oak,
>    https://builds.apache.org/view/AllJobs/).
> 
>    I would like to set up Jobs for Jackrabbit Filevault and Jackrabbit Filevault Maven Plugin. The latter requires also a Windows build job (we faced several Windows only issues in the past).
>    Also it would be nice to have a dedicated view in Jenkins for Apache Jackrabbit which contains all Jobs for Oak, Jackrabbit and Filevault.
>    Is there any reference documentation around the set up of CI jobs at Jackrabbit?
>    Also I could not find any Jenkinsfile anywhere so I guess the Jenkins Jobs are currently maintained manually?
>    Or should I instead rather use Travis?
> 
>    Thanks for your input.
>    Konrad
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Re: CI environment

Posted by Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com>.

Hi,

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18843

I'd say use the Apache infrastructure if possible, but if travis better fits
your requirements, then it's fine as well.

Regards
Marcel

On 20.08.19, 13:48, "Konrad Windszus" <ko...@gmx.de> wrote:
According to https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/523a8dbfbf6fa4cef6d98c5e25770a9f8e8525de3781516d031c068a@%3Cprivate.infra.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/523a8dbfbf6fa4cef6d98c5e25770a9f8e8525de3781516d031c068a@<private.infra.apache.org>> it
seems wise nowadays to primarily rely on Travis to also enable builds on PRs.
WDYT?

On 20. Aug 2019, at 13:42, Konrad Windszus <ko...@gmx.de> wrote:

Thanks for your input.
Konrad

Re: CI environment

Posted by Konrad Windszus <ko...@gmx.de>.

According to https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/523a8dbfbf6fa4cef6d98c5e25770a9f8e8525de3781516d031c068a@%3Cprivate.infra.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/523a8dbfbf6fa4cef6d98c5e25770a9f8e8525de3781516d031c068a@%3Cprivate.infra.apache.org%3E> it seems wise nowadays to primarily rely on Travis to also enable builds on PRs.
WDYT?

> On 20. Aug 2019, at 13:42, Konrad Windszus <ko...@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> the information at https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/continuous-integration.html seems pretty outdated.
> On the ASF Jenkins I could not find too many CI jobs either (some related to Oak, https://builds.apache.org/view/AllJobs/).
> 
> I would like to set up Jobs for Jackrabbit Filevault and Jackrabbit Filevault Maven Plugin. The latter requires also a Windows build job (we faced several Windows only issues in the past).
> Also it would be nice to have a dedicated view in Jenkins for Apache Jackrabbit which contains all Jobs for Oak, Jackrabbit and Filevault.
> Is there any reference documentation around the set up of CI jobs at Jackrabbit?
> Also I could not find any Jenkinsfile anywhere so I guess the Jenkins Jobs are currently maintained manually?
> Or should I instead rather use Travis?
> 
> Thanks for your input.
> Konrad
> 
>

Re: CI environment

Posted by Konrad Windszus <ko...@gmx.de>.

Thanks for the answer. I opened issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4468 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4468> to track that.
Konrad

> On 20. Aug 2019, at 15:42, Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> That page is indeed outdated. Do you mind creating an issue for this?
> I think this should be fixed.
> 
> I'm aware of:
> - https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit-trunk/
> - https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20matrix/ (disabled ~2 years ago)
> 
> Regards
> Marcel
> 
> On 20.08.19, 13:43, "Konrad Windszus" <ko...@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>    Hi,
>    the information at https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/continuous-integration.html seems pretty outdated.
>    On the ASF Jenkins I could not find too many CI jobs either (some related to Oak, https://builds.apache.org/view/AllJobs/).
> 
>    I would like to set up Jobs for Jackrabbit Filevault and Jackrabbit Filevault Maven Plugin. The latter requires also a Windows build job (we faced several Windows only issues in the past).
>    Also it would be nice to have a dedicated view in Jenkins for Apache Jackrabbit which contains all Jobs for Oak, Jackrabbit and Filevault.
>    Is there any reference documentation around the set up of CI jobs at Jackrabbit?
>    Also I could not find any Jenkinsfile anywhere so I guess the Jenkins Jobs are currently maintained manually?
>    Or should I instead rather use Travis?
> 
>    Thanks for your input.
>    Konrad
> 
> 
> 
>

Re: CI environment

Posted by Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com>.

Hi,

That page is indeed outdated. Do you mind creating an issue for this?
I think this should be fixed.

I'm aware of:
- https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit-trunk/
- https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20matrix/ (disabled ~2 years ago)

Regards
 Marcel

On 20.08.19, 13:43, "Konrad Windszus" <ko...@gmx.de> wrote:

    Hi,
    the information at https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/continuous-integration.html seems pretty outdated.
    On the ASF Jenkins I could not find too many CI jobs either (some related to Oak, https://builds.apache.org/view/AllJobs/).
    
    I would like to set up Jobs for Jackrabbit Filevault and Jackrabbit Filevault Maven Plugin. The latter requires also a Windows build job (we faced several Windows only issues in the past).
    Also it would be nice to have a dedicated view in Jenkins for Apache Jackrabbit which contains all Jobs for Oak, Jackrabbit and Filevault.
    Is there any reference documentation around the set up of CI jobs at Jackrabbit?
    Also I could not find any Jenkinsfile anywhere so I guess the Jenkins Jobs are currently maintained manually?
    Or should I instead rather use Travis?
    
    Thanks for your input.
    Konrad