You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucenenet.apache.org by Jude Bowman <ju...@hotmail.com> on 2014/02/06 23:58:06 UTC
Re: Lucene.net 4?
I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who is currently
using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source project but I
have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good oppertunity to do
so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would be eligible to
contribute.
Thanks!
Jude
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
+1 - resharpening Sharpen would be of a great help! (tho I'd personally
find it more useful to have this as a VS plugin - perhaps as a R# plugin)
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com> wrote:
> We'll have a few more bugfixes for v4 coming soon to that branch, found an
> issue with AbstractAppendingLongBuffer in our testing. But we are already
> using core, facet, and highlight for beta testing use!
>
> Jude, if you get started, note that we are currently targeting 4.3.1
> compatibility, so make sure that any Java code you port is from the
> lucene_solr_4_3 branch on the lucene/solr repo. We still need help with
> porting the rest of the modules, and unit tests. Since Sharpen was a bit
> unmaintained and as far as I could tell didn't have Java 7 compatibility,
> we'd been porting it by hand, but if you're interested in getting Sharpen
> up to date that would be helpful too.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:32 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> >wrote:
>
> > For v4 features / bugs - branch_4x
> >
> > --
> >
> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Sounds good. Should I start with a copy of the "branch_4x" or
> > > "Lucene.Net_4e" branch, or something else?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> itamar@code972.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Nothing that comes to mind - but I could use his help next week in the
> > >> bugfix release if he's up to it!
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <
> geobmx540@hotmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Jude -
> > >>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at porting 4.0
> > >>> over (take a look at this page)
> > >>>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > >>> I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now it's
> > pretty
> > >>> empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific feature). Using
> > the
> > >>> page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick out a feature,
> > create
> > >>> your ticket for that feature, and then create a pull request.
> > >>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations you
> make,
> > >>> just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request comes in.
> > >>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature that
> Jude
> > >>> could work on for us?
> > >>> ~P
> > >>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > >>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > >>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > >>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who is
> > >>> currently
> > >>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source
> > project
> > >>> but I
> > >>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good
> oppertunity
> > >>> to do
> > >>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would be
> > >>> eligible to
> > >>> > contribute.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Thanks!
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Jude
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Paul Irwin
> Lead Software Engineer
> feature[23]
>
> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> Cell: 863-698-9294
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>.
We'll have a few more bugfixes for v4 coming soon to that branch, found an
issue with AbstractAppendingLongBuffer in our testing. But we are already
using core, facet, and highlight for beta testing use!
Jude, if you get started, note that we are currently targeting 4.3.1
compatibility, so make sure that any Java code you port is from the
lucene_solr_4_3 branch on the lucene/solr repo. We still need help with
porting the rest of the modules, and unit tests. Since Sharpen was a bit
unmaintained and as far as I could tell didn't have Java 7 compatibility,
we'd been porting it by hand, but if you're interested in getting Sharpen
up to date that would be helpful too.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:32 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>wrote:
> For v4 features / bugs - branch_4x
>
> --
>
> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Sounds good. Should I start with a copy of the "branch_4x" or
> > "Lucene.Net_4e" branch, or something else?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Nothing that comes to mind - but I could use his help next week in the
> >> bugfix release if he's up to it!
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Jude -
> >>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at porting 4.0
> >>> over (take a look at this page)
> >>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> >>> I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now it's
> pretty
> >>> empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific feature). Using
> the
> >>> page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick out a feature,
> create
> >>> your ticket for that feature, and then create a pull request.
> >>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations you make,
> >>> just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request comes in.
> >>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature that Jude
> >>> could work on for us?
> >>> ~P
> >>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> >>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> >>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> >>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> >>> >
> >>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who is
> >>> currently
> >>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source
> project
> >>> but I
> >>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good oppertunity
> >>> to do
> >>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would be
> >>> eligible to
> >>> > contribute.
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks!
> >>> >
> >>> > Jude
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
--
Paul Irwin
Lead Software Engineer
feature[23]
Email: pirwin@feature23.com
Cell: 863-698-9294
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
For v4 features / bugs - branch_4x
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds good. Should I start with a copy of the "branch_4x" or
> "Lucene.Net_4e" branch, or something else?
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>wrote:
>
>> Nothing that comes to mind - but I could use his help next week in the
>> bugfix release if he's up to it!
>>
>> --
>>
>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Jude -
>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at porting 4.0
>>> over (take a look at this page)
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
>>> I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now it's pretty
>>> empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific feature). Using the
>>> page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick out a feature, create
>>> your ticket for that feature, and then create a pull request.
>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations you make,
>>> just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request comes in.
>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature that Jude
>>> could work on for us?
>>> ~P
>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
>>> >
>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who is
>>> currently
>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source project
>>> but I
>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good oppertunity
>>> to do
>>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would be
>>> eligible to
>>> > contribute.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks!
>>> >
>>> > Jude
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good. Should I start with a copy of the "branch_4x" or
"Lucene.Net_4e" branch, or something else?
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>wrote:
> Nothing that comes to mind - but I could use his help next week in the
> bugfix release if he's up to it!
>
> --
>
> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Jude -
>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at porting 4.0 over
>> (take a look at this page)
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
>> I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now it's pretty
>> empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific feature). Using the
>> page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick out a feature, create
>> your ticket for that feature, and then create a pull request.
>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations you make,
>> just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request comes in.
>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature that Jude
>> could work on for us?
>> ~P
>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
>> >
>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who is
>> currently
>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source project
>> but I
>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good oppertunity
>> to do
>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would be
>> eligible to
>> > contribute.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > Jude
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
Nothing that comes to mind - but I could use his help next week in the
bugfix release if he's up to it!
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> Jude -
> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at porting 4.0 over
> (take a look at this page)
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now it's pretty
> empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific feature). Using the
> page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick out a feature, create
> your ticket for that feature, and then create a pull request.
> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations you make,
> just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request comes in.
> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature that Jude
> could work on for us?
> ~P
> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> >
> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who is
> currently
> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source project
> but I
> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good oppertunity to
> do
> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would be
> eligible to
> > contribute.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Jude
> >
> >
>
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by michael herndon <mh...@michaelherndon.com>.
Personally I like using other mediums, but all technical decisions needs to
be made on the public mailing lists and be open for discussion. So if
conversations happen outside of the list, it will need to be brought back
here at some point.
https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#mailing-list-naming-policy
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com> wrote:
> I think now that discussion is kicking up again it'd be good to do a Google
> Hangout sometime to discuss some of this. Anyone else interested in doing
> that?
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Lucene.Net has a history of working on mono, which is one of the reasons
> > NUnit is still used. Does xUnit work on Mono consistently yet?
> >
> > While the carrot test randomizer also runs the tests in random order and
> > provides random generated values, I think the real point of it being used
> > is to log stack information and seed information so that when a
> randomized
> > test fails, the failure can be reproduced and repeated.
> >
> > One of the problems of the Lucene test suite in the past is that tests
> > would randomly fail, but it was hard to figure to out the cause.
> >
> > -M
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I'd say we are at a stage where restructuring makes sense even if it
> > delays
> > > shipping the next version, if it will help us keep up with future
> > versions
> > > faster in the future.
> > >
> > > There are solutions for randomized testing in .NET which don't involve
> > > porting more stuff from Java. As far as I'm concerned we can even
> switch
> > to
> > > xUnit.NET if it makes more sense.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:30 AM, michael herndon <
> > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > The test framework needs to be completed first. It looks likes the
> > test
> > > > framework is making using of external junit addins
> > > >
> > > > Parts of following libraries may need to be ported and nunit
> extended .
> > > > https://github.com/carrotsearch/randomizedtesting (Apache 2.0)
> > > > https://github.com/ferstl/junit-testgroups (Mit)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:41 AM, michael herndon <
> > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > These items are good ideas and should be entered into Jira as some
> > kind
> > > > of
> > > > > project meta task so that decisions can be tracked and prioritized.
> > > > >
> > > > > With a code base of this size, each project wide change like
> > switching
> > > > > asserts comes at a cost and so does getting automation right.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is the primary goal of branch_4x to ship soon as possible? or is it
> > to
> > > > > increase the sustainability of the project ?
> > > > >
> > > > > These goals are not mutually exclusive. However, it is easier to
> > > > > prioritize work items if there is some primary goal or agreed upon
> > > > > prioritization of goals.
> > > > >
> > > > > -----------
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll start with getting the core test library and test framework to
> > > > > compile and making it obvious which classes need to be converted /
> > > > updated.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I'll let someone else drive that... haha
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I am not a R# user. But I did put all the logic for doing the
> syntax
> > > > >> conversion in a separate library in that repo, so it should be
> > > > relatively
> > > > >> easy to take that and add to a plugin, I would guess.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > >> >wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Cool, then I'll look into that. Any chance you can make it a R#
> > > > plugin?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > --
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > >> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > >> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > >> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul Irwin <
> pirwin@feature23.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > That is exactly what the tool I created does, it does a
> > syntactic
> > > > >> > > conversion only of Java to C# and does that work for you. It
> > does
> > > > not
> > > > >> > > resolve symbols or anything. It should help you go a bit
> faster
> > > than
> > > > >> > doing
> > > > >> > > the syntactic conversion manually by copy-paste.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > >> itamar@code972.com
> > > > >> > > >wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > For porting core parts of the code? sure. I just think its a
> > > waste
> > > > >> of
> > > > >> > > time
> > > > >> > > > to work on porting tests, so the only thing I want to be
> doing
> > > is
> > > > >> > > > copy-paste and then as few changes as possible (replacing
> > import
> > > > >> with
> > > > >> > > > using, package with namespace, etc - which if we could
> > automate
> > > > that
> > > > >> > > could
> > > > >> > > > be great) and the rest should just compile and work because
> > the
> > > > >> tests
> > > > >> > > > framework already supports most of what happens there.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > --
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > >> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > >> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > >> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/
> >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Paul Irwin <
> > > pirwin@feature23.com>
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > > I like that thinking for unit tests. I wrote a quick Java
> to
> > > C#
> > > > >> > > converter
> > > > >> > > > > since Sharpen wasn't maintained that adds 1.7 support. It
> > uses
> > > > >> Roslyn
> > > > >> > > for
> > > > >> > > > > the C# generation. I used this for some of my later
> porting
> > > > work.
> > > > >> > It's
> > > > >> > > > far
> > > > >> > > > > from perfect, but handles most of the Java syntax
> correctly.
> > > It
> > > > >> warns
> > > > >> > > you
> > > > >> > > > > if it encounters an unsigned right-shift or
> > > > >> > > > > break-to-label/continue-to-label.
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Repo: https://github.com/paulirwin/JavaToCSharp
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Maybe that will help?
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > >> > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > >> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > +1
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing
> > > framework
> > > > >> for
> > > > >> > > > > > Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly
> > copy-pasted
> > > > and
> > > > >> > just
> > > > >> > > > > run.
> > > > >> > > > > > That'd probably involve many extension method and a
> smart
> > > base
> > > > >> > class
> > > > >> > > > that
> > > > >> > > > > > will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or asserts
> into
> > > > >> their C#
> > > > >> > > > > > equivalents.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > While it makes sense to have the core comply with .NET
> > > > >> standards, I
> > > > >> > > see
> > > > >> > > > > no
> > > > >> > > > > > point in duplicating the effort for testing.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't got
> around
> > > to
> > > > >> doing
> > > > >> > > it
> > > > >> > > > > yet.
> > > > >> > > > > > Will be happy to help tho.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > --
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > >> > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > >> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > >> > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > >> > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > http://manning.com/synhershko/
> > > >
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon <
> > > > >> > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > I don't mind working on the tests or working towards
> > > getting
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > > > tests
> > > > >> > > > > > to a
> > > > >> > > > > > > state where they compile and pass, but I don't want to
> > > > >> duplicate
> > > > >> > > work
> > > > >> > > > > > > either.
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > If the the tests are not currently being worked on,
> then
> > > > I'll
> > > > >> go
> > > > >> > > > ahead
> > > > >> > > > > > and
> > > > >> > > > > > > start working on getting the the Core test library
> into
> > a
> > > > >> state
> > > > >> > > that
> > > > >> > > > it
> > > > >> > > > > > can
> > > > >> > > > > > > be compiled and run tests.
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <
> > > > >> pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even
> > today.
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for
> > core
> > > at
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > > > > moment?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar
> Syn-Hershko <
> > > > >> > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list.
> > Keep
> > > > >> pushing
> > > > >> > > > > commits
> > > > >> > > > > > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > your
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be
> merged
> > > let
> > > > >> us
> > > > >> > > know.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > >> > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > > > >> > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <
> > > > >> > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira
> > task
> > > > for
> > > > >> > this
> > > > >> > > > > work:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that
> > they
> > > > >> can be
> > > > >> > > > > merged
> > > > >> > > > > > > into
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > branch. Please let me know if I should change
> > the
> > > > >> way I
> > > > >> > am
> > > > >> > > > > doing
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > anything
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar
> > > Syn-Hershko <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Please try to commit more often...
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > >> > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > > > >> > > http://manning.com/synhershko/
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman
> <
> > > > >> > > > > judebo@gmail.com>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to
> > halt
> > > > the
> > > > >> > > work I
> > > > >> > > > > was
> > > > >> > > > > > > > doing
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\"
> folder
> > > to
> > > > >> match
> > > > >> > > > what
> > > > >> > > > > is
> > > > >> > > > > > > in
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes
> > added
> > > > as
> > > > >> > well
> > > > >> > > > as a
> > > > >> > > > > > few
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > other
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with
> > fine
> > > > >> grain,
> > > > >> > or
> > > > >> > > > is
> > > > >> > > > > > > what I
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > did
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of
> > > changes?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude
> Bowman <
> > > > >> > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java
> > version
> > > > from
> > > > >> > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > lucene_solr_4_3
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> branch. located at
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I basically was attempting to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the
> > > classes
> > > > >> that
> > > > >> > > > > already
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > exist,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the
> > > > >> Spatial\BBox
> > > > >> > > > > > > > subdirectory)
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java
> > 4.3
> > > > >> > version
> > > > >> > > > that
> > > > >> > > > > > do
> > > > >> > > > > > > > not
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n
> > > component
> > > > of
> > > > >> > this
> > > > >> > > > > > > project.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Is
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3
> > branch
> > > > not
> > > > >> > the
> > > > >> > > > > > correct
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > thing
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > to be
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start
> > > with, I
> > > > >> do
> > > > >> > not
> > > > >> > > > > mind
> > > > >> > > > > > > > moving
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> something a little more simpler. If you
> have
> > > any
> > > > >> > > > > > > > recommendations, I
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > would
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> appreciate it.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar
> > > > >> Syn-Hershko <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always
> > some
> > > > >> form of
> > > > >> > > > > > > discussion
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> required.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did
> > > > there?
> > > > >> The
> > > > >> > > > > spatial
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > module
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the
> latest
> > > > >> spatial4j
> > > > >> > > > (see
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > spatial4n, which
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well)
> and
> > > the
> > > > >> > Spatial
> > > > >> > > > > > module
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > there. There
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I
> > think
> > > > you
> > > > >> > > picked
> > > > >> > > > > > quite
> > > > >> > > > > > > a
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > tough task
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> as your first...
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> --
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > >> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > > > >> > > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul
> > Irwin <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jude,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we
> do
> > > not
> > > > >> use
> > > > >> > > pull
> > > > >> > > > > > > requests
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > on
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for
> > > > >> something to
> > > > >> > > go
> > > > >> > > > > > > > upstream,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > let me
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and
> push
> > > it
> > > > >> up.
> > > > >> > > > > > Eventually
> > > > >> > > > > > > we
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > can get
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough
> > progress
> > > > to
> > > > >> > make
> > > > >> > > it
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > worthwhile. We
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of
> the
> > > 4.x
> > > > >> work
> > > > >> > > as I
> > > > >> > > > > > don't
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > think it's
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets
> for
> > > > >> issues.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude
> > Bowman
> > > <
> > > > >> > > > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I started by working in the
> > Contrib.Spatial
> > > > >> project
> > > > >> > > and
> > > > >> > > > > > made
> > > > >> > > > > > > a
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > lot
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build
> > > errors
> > > > >> down.
> > > > >> > > > From
> > > > >> > > > > > my
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > public repo
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I
> > > > committed
> > > > >> > and
> > > > >> > > > then
> > > > >> > > > > > > sent
> > > > >> > > > > > > > a
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub. If it does
> > not
> > > > >> show
> > > > >> > on
> > > > >> > > > your
> > > > >> > > > > > > end,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > or
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I did not
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes
> to
> > > > you,
> > > > >> > > please
> > > > >> > > > > let
> > > > >> > > > > > me
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > know.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to
> > complete
> > > > the
> > > > >> > > > porting
> > > > >> > > > > of
> > > > >> > > > > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on
> > > that
> > > > >> until
> > > > >> > > it
> > > > >> > > > is
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > complete?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jude
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM,
> Prescott
> > > > >> Nasser <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude -
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now
> we
> > > are
> > > > >> > > looking
> > > > >> > > > at
> > > > >> > > > > > > > porting
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be
> to
> > > > check
> > > > >> > out
> > > > >> > > > our
> > > > >> > > > > > > JIRA (
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET -
> > > > >> > > > right
> > > > >> > > > > > now
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > it's
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a
> > ticket
> > > > for
> > > > >> > your
> > > > >> > > > > > specific
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > feature).
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul
> > and
> > > > >> > Itamar's
> > > > >> > > > > help,
> > > > >> > > > > > > pick
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > out a
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that
> > > feature,
> > > > >> and
> > > > >> > > then
> > > > >> > > > > > > create
> > > > >> > > > > > > > a
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > pull
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> request.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA
> for
> > > any
> > > > >> > > > > > contribuations
> > > > >> > > > > > > > you
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do
> that
> > > > when
> > > > >> a
> > > > >> > > pull
> > > > >> > > > > > > request
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > comes in.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is
> > there a
> > > > >> > specific
> > > > >> > > > > > feature
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > that
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ~P
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a
> Sr.
> > > > >> Software
> > > > >> > > > > Engineer
> > > > >> > > > > > > who
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > is
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> currently
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never
> > > worked
> > > > >> on
> > > > >> > an
> > > > >> > > > open
> > > > >> > > > > > > > source
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> project but I
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping
> > this
> > > > >> would
> > > > >> > > be a
> > > > >> > > > > > good
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at
> > > > >> > jude_bowman@hotmail.comifI
> > > > >> > > > > > > would
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > be
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> eligible to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Jude
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > --
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Paul Irwin
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > > >> > > > > > > > feature[23]
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > --
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Paul Irwin
> > > > >> > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > > >> > > > > feature[23]
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >> > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > --
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Paul Irwin
> > > > >> > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > > >> > > feature[23]
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >> > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Paul Irwin
> > > > >> Lead Software Engineer
> > > > >> feature[23]
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Paul Irwin
> Lead Software Engineer
> feature[23]
>
> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> Cell: 863-698-9294
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>.
I think now that discussion is kicking up again it'd be good to do a Google
Hangout sometime to discuss some of this. Anyone else interested in doing
that?
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> wrote:
> Lucene.Net has a history of working on mono, which is one of the reasons
> NUnit is still used. Does xUnit work on Mono consistently yet?
>
> While the carrot test randomizer also runs the tests in random order and
> provides random generated values, I think the real point of it being used
> is to log stack information and seed information so that when a randomized
> test fails, the failure can be reproduced and repeated.
>
> One of the problems of the Lucene test suite in the past is that tests
> would randomly fail, but it was hard to figure to out the cause.
>
> -M
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I'd say we are at a stage where restructuring makes sense even if it
> delays
> > shipping the next version, if it will help us keep up with future
> versions
> > faster in the future.
> >
> > There are solutions for randomized testing in .NET which don't involve
> > porting more stuff from Java. As far as I'm concerned we can even switch
> to
> > xUnit.NET if it makes more sense.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:30 AM, michael herndon <
> > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > The test framework needs to be completed first. It looks likes the
> test
> > > framework is making using of external junit addins
> > >
> > > Parts of following libraries may need to be ported and nunit extended .
> > > https://github.com/carrotsearch/randomizedtesting (Apache 2.0)
> > > https://github.com/ferstl/junit-testgroups (Mit)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:41 AM, michael herndon <
> > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > These items are good ideas and should be entered into Jira as some
> kind
> > > of
> > > > project meta task so that decisions can be tracked and prioritized.
> > > >
> > > > With a code base of this size, each project wide change like
> switching
> > > > asserts comes at a cost and so does getting automation right.
> > > >
> > > > Is the primary goal of branch_4x to ship soon as possible? or is it
> to
> > > > increase the sustainability of the project ?
> > > >
> > > > These goals are not mutually exclusive. However, it is easier to
> > > > prioritize work items if there is some primary goal or agreed upon
> > > > prioritization of goals.
> > > >
> > > > -----------
> > > >
> > > > I'll start with getting the core test library and test framework to
> > > > compile and making it obvious which classes need to be converted /
> > > updated.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I'll let someone else drive that... haha
> > > >>
> > > >> I am not a R# user. But I did put all the logic for doing the syntax
> > > >> conversion in a separate library in that repo, so it should be
> > > relatively
> > > >> easy to take that and add to a plugin, I would guess.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > itamar@code972.com
> > > >> >wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Cool, then I'll look into that. Any chance you can make it a R#
> > > plugin?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > >> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > That is exactly what the tool I created does, it does a
> syntactic
> > > >> > > conversion only of Java to C# and does that work for you. It
> does
> > > not
> > > >> > > resolve symbols or anything. It should help you go a bit faster
> > than
> > > >> > doing
> > > >> > > the syntactic conversion manually by copy-paste.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > >> itamar@code972.com
> > > >> > > >wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > For porting core parts of the code? sure. I just think its a
> > waste
> > > >> of
> > > >> > > time
> > > >> > > > to work on porting tests, so the only thing I want to be doing
> > is
> > > >> > > > copy-paste and then as few changes as possible (replacing
> import
> > > >> with
> > > >> > > > using, package with namespace, etc - which if we could
> automate
> > > that
> > > >> > > could
> > > >> > > > be great) and the rest should just compile and work because
> the
> > > >> tests
> > > >> > > > framework already supports most of what happens there.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > --
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > >> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Paul Irwin <
> > pirwin@feature23.com>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > I like that thinking for unit tests. I wrote a quick Java to
> > C#
> > > >> > > converter
> > > >> > > > > since Sharpen wasn't maintained that adds 1.7 support. It
> uses
> > > >> Roslyn
> > > >> > > for
> > > >> > > > > the C# generation. I used this for some of my later porting
> > > work.
> > > >> > It's
> > > >> > > > far
> > > >> > > > > from perfect, but handles most of the Java syntax correctly.
> > It
> > > >> warns
> > > >> > > you
> > > >> > > > > if it encounters an unsigned right-shift or
> > > >> > > > > break-to-label/continue-to-label.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Repo: https://github.com/paulirwin/JavaToCSharp
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Maybe that will help?
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > >> > > itamar@code972.com
> > > >> > > > > >wrote:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > +1
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing
> > framework
> > > >> for
> > > >> > > > > > Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly
> copy-pasted
> > > and
> > > >> > just
> > > >> > > > > run.
> > > >> > > > > > That'd probably involve many extension method and a smart
> > base
> > > >> > class
> > > >> > > > that
> > > >> > > > > > will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or asserts into
> > > >> their C#
> > > >> > > > > > equivalents.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > While it makes sense to have the core comply with .NET
> > > >> standards, I
> > > >> > > see
> > > >> > > > > no
> > > >> > > > > > point in duplicating the effort for testing.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't got around
> > to
> > > >> doing
> > > >> > > it
> > > >> > > > > yet.
> > > >> > > > > > Will be happy to help tho.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >> > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > >> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > >> > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >> > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> http://manning.com/synhershko/
> > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon <
> > > >> > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > I don't mind working on the tests or working towards
> > getting
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > tests
> > > >> > > > > > to a
> > > >> > > > > > > state where they compile and pass, but I don't want to
> > > >> duplicate
> > > >> > > work
> > > >> > > > > > > either.
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > If the the tests are not currently being worked on, then
> > > I'll
> > > >> go
> > > >> > > > ahead
> > > >> > > > > > and
> > > >> > > > > > > start working on getting the the Core test library into
> a
> > > >> state
> > > >> > > that
> > > >> > > > it
> > > >> > > > > > can
> > > >> > > > > > > be compiled and run tests.
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <
> > > >> pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even
> today.
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> > > >> > > > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for
> core
> > at
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > > moment?
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > >> > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list.
> Keep
> > > >> pushing
> > > >> > > > > commits
> > > >> > > > > > > to
> > > >> > > > > > > > > your
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged
> > let
> > > >> us
> > > >> > > know.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > >> > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > > >> > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <
> > > >> > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira
> task
> > > for
> > > >> > this
> > > >> > > > > work:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that
> they
> > > >> can be
> > > >> > > > > merged
> > > >> > > > > > > into
> > > >> > > > > > > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > branch. Please let me know if I should change
> the
> > > >> way I
> > > >> > am
> > > >> > > > > doing
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > anything
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar
> > Syn-Hershko <
> > > >> > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Please try to commit more often...
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> --
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > >> > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > > >> > > http://manning.com/synhershko/
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <
> > > >> > > > > judebo@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to
> halt
> > > the
> > > >> > > work I
> > > >> > > > > was
> > > >> > > > > > > > doing
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder
> > to
> > > >> match
> > > >> > > > what
> > > >> > > > > is
> > > >> > > > > > > in
> > > >> > > > > > > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes
> added
> > > as
> > > >> > well
> > > >> > > > as a
> > > >> > > > > > few
> > > >> > > > > > > > > other
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with
> fine
> > > >> grain,
> > > >> > or
> > > >> > > > is
> > > >> > > > > > > what I
> > > >> > > > > > > > > did
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of
> > changes?
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <
> > > >> > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java
> version
> > > from
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > lucene_solr_4_3
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> branch. located at
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I basically was attempting to
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the
> > classes
> > > >> that
> > > >> > > > > already
> > > >> > > > > > > > > exist,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the
> > > >> Spatial\BBox
> > > >> > > > > > > > subdirectory)
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java
> 4.3
> > > >> > version
> > > >> > > > that
> > > >> > > > > > do
> > > >> > > > > > > > not
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n
> > component
> > > of
> > > >> > this
> > > >> > > > > > > project.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Is
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3
> branch
> > > not
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > > > > correct
> > > >> > > > > > > > > thing
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > to be
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start
> > with, I
> > > >> do
> > > >> > not
> > > >> > > > > mind
> > > >> > > > > > > > moving
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> something a little more simpler. If you have
> > any
> > > >> > > > > > > > recommendations, I
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > would
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> appreciate it.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar
> > > >> Syn-Hershko <
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always
> some
> > > >> form of
> > > >> > > > > > > discussion
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> required.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did
> > > there?
> > > >> The
> > > >> > > > > spatial
> > > >> > > > > > > > > module
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest
> > > >> spatial4j
> > > >> > > > (see
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > spatial4n, which
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and
> > the
> > > >> > Spatial
> > > >> > > > > > module
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > there. There
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I
> think
> > > you
> > > >> > > picked
> > > >> > > > > > quite
> > > >> > > > > > > a
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > tough task
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> as your first...
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> --
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > >> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > > >> > > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul
> Irwin <
> > > >> > > > > > > > pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jude,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do
> > not
> > > >> use
> > > >> > > pull
> > > >> > > > > > > requests
> > > >> > > > > > > > > on
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for
> > > >> something to
> > > >> > > go
> > > >> > > > > > > > upstream,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > let me
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push
> > it
> > > >> up.
> > > >> > > > > > Eventually
> > > >> > > > > > > we
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > can get
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough
> progress
> > > to
> > > >> > make
> > > >> > > it
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > worthwhile. We
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the
> > 4.x
> > > >> work
> > > >> > > as I
> > > >> > > > > > don't
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > think it's
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for
> > > >> issues.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude
> Bowman
> > <
> > > >> > > > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I started by working in the
> Contrib.Spatial
> > > >> project
> > > >> > > and
> > > >> > > > > > made
> > > >> > > > > > > a
> > > >> > > > > > > > > lot
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build
> > errors
> > > >> down.
> > > >> > > > From
> > > >> > > > > > my
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > public repo
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I
> > > committed
> > > >> > and
> > > >> > > > then
> > > >> > > > > > > sent
> > > >> > > > > > > > a
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub. If it does
> not
> > > >> show
> > > >> > on
> > > >> > > > your
> > > >> > > > > > > end,
> > > >> > > > > > > > or
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > I did not
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to
> > > you,
> > > >> > > please
> > > >> > > > > let
> > > >> > > > > > me
> > > >> > > > > > > > > know.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to
> complete
> > > the
> > > >> > > > porting
> > > >> > > > > of
> > > >> > > > > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on
> > that
> > > >> until
> > > >> > > it
> > > >> > > > is
> > > >> > > > > > > > > complete?
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jude
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott
> > > >> Nasser <
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude -
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we
> > are
> > > >> > > looking
> > > >> > > > at
> > > >> > > > > > > > porting
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to
> > > check
> > > >> > out
> > > >> > > > our
> > > >> > > > > > > JIRA (
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET -
> > > >> > > > right
> > > >> > > > > > now
> > > >> > > > > > > > > it's
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a
> ticket
> > > for
> > > >> > your
> > > >> > > > > > specific
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > feature).
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul
> and
> > > >> > Itamar's
> > > >> > > > > help,
> > > >> > > > > > > pick
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > out a
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that
> > feature,
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > then
> > > >> > > > > > > create
> > > >> > > > > > > > a
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > pull
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> request.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for
> > any
> > > >> > > > > > contribuations
> > > >> > > > > > > > you
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that
> > > when
> > > >> a
> > > >> > > pull
> > > >> > > > > > > request
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > comes in.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is
> there a
> > > >> > specific
> > > >> > > > > > feature
> > > >> > > > > > > > > that
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ~P
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr.
> > > >> Software
> > > >> > > > > Engineer
> > > >> > > > > > > who
> > > >> > > > > > > > > is
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> currently
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never
> > worked
> > > >> on
> > > >> > an
> > > >> > > > open
> > > >> > > > > > > > source
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> project but I
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping
> this
> > > >> would
> > > >> > > be a
> > > >> > > > > > good
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at
> > > >> > jude_bowman@hotmail.comifI
> > > >> > > > > > > would
> > > >> > > > > > > > > be
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> eligible to
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Jude
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Paul Irwin
> > > >> > > > > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > >> > > > > > > > feature[23]
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > --
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Paul Irwin
> > > >> > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > >> > > > > feature[23]
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >> > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > --
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Paul Irwin
> > > >> > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > >> > > feature[23]
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >> > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >>
> > > >> Paul Irwin
> > > >> Lead Software Engineer
> > > >> feature[23]
> > > >>
> > > >> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Paul Irwin
Lead Software Engineer
feature[23]
Email: pirwin@feature23.com
Cell: 863-698-9294
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by michael herndon <mh...@michaelherndon.com>.
Lucene.Net has a history of working on mono, which is one of the reasons
NUnit is still used. Does xUnit work on Mono consistently yet?
While the carrot test randomizer also runs the tests in random order and
provides random generated values, I think the real point of it being used
is to log stack information and seed information so that when a randomized
test fails, the failure can be reproduced and repeated.
One of the problems of the Lucene test suite in the past is that tests
would randomly fail, but it was hard to figure to out the cause.
-M
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>wrote:
> I'd say we are at a stage where restructuring makes sense even if it delays
> shipping the next version, if it will help us keep up with future versions
> faster in the future.
>
> There are solutions for randomized testing in .NET which don't involve
> porting more stuff from Java. As far as I'm concerned we can even switch to
> xUnit.NET if it makes more sense.
>
> --
>
> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:30 AM, michael herndon <
> mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > wrote:
>
> > The test framework needs to be completed first. It looks likes the test
> > framework is making using of external junit addins
> >
> > Parts of following libraries may need to be ported and nunit extended .
> > https://github.com/carrotsearch/randomizedtesting (Apache 2.0)
> > https://github.com/ferstl/junit-testgroups (Mit)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:41 AM, michael herndon <
> > mherndon@michaelherndon.com> wrote:
> >
> > > These items are good ideas and should be entered into Jira as some kind
> > of
> > > project meta task so that decisions can be tracked and prioritized.
> > >
> > > With a code base of this size, each project wide change like switching
> > > asserts comes at a cost and so does getting automation right.
> > >
> > > Is the primary goal of branch_4x to ship soon as possible? or is it to
> > > increase the sustainability of the project ?
> > >
> > > These goals are not mutually exclusive. However, it is easier to
> > > prioritize work items if there is some primary goal or agreed upon
> > > prioritization of goals.
> > >
> > > -----------
> > >
> > > I'll start with getting the core test library and test framework to
> > > compile and making it obvious which classes need to be converted /
> > updated.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I'll let someone else drive that... haha
> > >>
> > >> I am not a R# user. But I did put all the logic for doing the syntax
> > >> conversion in a separate library in that repo, so it should be
> > relatively
> > >> easy to take that and add to a plugin, I would guess.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> itamar@code972.com
> > >> >wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Cool, then I'll look into that. Any chance you can make it a R#
> > plugin?
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> >
> > >> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > >> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > >> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > That is exactly what the tool I created does, it does a syntactic
> > >> > > conversion only of Java to C# and does that work for you. It does
> > not
> > >> > > resolve symbols or anything. It should help you go a bit faster
> than
> > >> > doing
> > >> > > the syntactic conversion manually by copy-paste.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > >> itamar@code972.com
> > >> > > >wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > For porting core parts of the code? sure. I just think its a
> waste
> > >> of
> > >> > > time
> > >> > > > to work on porting tests, so the only thing I want to be doing
> is
> > >> > > > copy-paste and then as few changes as possible (replacing import
> > >> with
> > >> > > > using, package with namespace, etc - which if we could automate
> > that
> > >> > > could
> > >> > > > be great) and the rest should just compile and work because the
> > >> tests
> > >> > > > framework already supports most of what happens there.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > --
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > >> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > >> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Paul Irwin <
> pirwin@feature23.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > I like that thinking for unit tests. I wrote a quick Java to
> C#
> > >> > > converter
> > >> > > > > since Sharpen wasn't maintained that adds 1.7 support. It uses
> > >> Roslyn
> > >> > > for
> > >> > > > > the C# generation. I used this for some of my later porting
> > work.
> > >> > It's
> > >> > > > far
> > >> > > > > from perfect, but handles most of the Java syntax correctly.
> It
> > >> warns
> > >> > > you
> > >> > > > > if it encounters an unsigned right-shift or
> > >> > > > > break-to-label/continue-to-label.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Repo: https://github.com/paulirwin/JavaToCSharp
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Maybe that will help?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > >> > > itamar@code972.com
> > >> > > > > >wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > +1
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing
> framework
> > >> for
> > >> > > > > > Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly copy-pasted
> > and
> > >> > just
> > >> > > > > run.
> > >> > > > > > That'd probably involve many extension method and a smart
> base
> > >> > class
> > >> > > > that
> > >> > > > > > will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or asserts into
> > >> their C#
> > >> > > > > > equivalents.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > While it makes sense to have the core comply with .NET
> > >> standards, I
> > >> > > see
> > >> > > > > no
> > >> > > > > > point in duplicating the effort for testing.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't got around
> to
> > >> doing
> > >> > > it
> > >> > > > > yet.
> > >> > > > > > Will be happy to help tho.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >> > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > >> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > >> > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > >> > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/
> >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon <
> > >> > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > I don't mind working on the tests or working towards
> getting
> > >> the
> > >> > > > tests
> > >> > > > > > to a
> > >> > > > > > > state where they compile and pass, but I don't want to
> > >> duplicate
> > >> > > work
> > >> > > > > > > either.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > If the the tests are not currently being worked on, then
> > I'll
> > >> go
> > >> > > > ahead
> > >> > > > > > and
> > >> > > > > > > start working on getting the the Core test library into a
> > >> state
> > >> > > that
> > >> > > > it
> > >> > > > > > can
> > >> > > > > > > be compiled and run tests.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <
> > >> pirwin@feature23.com
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even today.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> > >> > > > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for core
> at
> > >> the
> > >> > > > > moment?
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > >> > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > >> > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list. Keep
> > >> pushing
> > >> > > > > commits
> > >> > > > > > > to
> > >> > > > > > > > > your
> > >> > > > > > > > > > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged
> let
> > >> us
> > >> > > know.
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >> > > > > > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > >> > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > >> > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <
> > >> > > judebo@gmail.com
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira task
> > for
> > >> > this
> > >> > > > > work:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that they
> > >> can be
> > >> > > > > merged
> > >> > > > > > > into
> > >> > > > > > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > branch. Please let me know if I should change the
> > >> way I
> > >> > am
> > >> > > > > doing
> > >> > > > > > > > > > anything
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar
> Syn-Hershko <
> > >> > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Please try to commit more often...
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> --
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > >> > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > >> > > http://manning.com/synhershko/
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <
> > >> > > > > judebo@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt
> > the
> > >> > > work I
> > >> > > > > was
> > >> > > > > > > > doing
> > >> > > > > > > > > > in
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder
> to
> > >> match
> > >> > > > what
> > >> > > > > is
> > >> > > > > > > in
> > >> > > > > > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added
> > as
> > >> > well
> > >> > > > as a
> > >> > > > > > few
> > >> > > > > > > > > other
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with fine
> > >> grain,
> > >> > or
> > >> > > > is
> > >> > > > > > > what I
> > >> > > > > > > > > did
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of
> changes?
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <
> > >> > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version
> > from
> > >> > the
> > >> > > > > > > > > > lucene_solr_4_3
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> branch. located at
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I basically was attempting to
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the
> classes
> > >> that
> > >> > > > > already
> > >> > > > > > > > > exist,
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the
> > >> Spatial\BBox
> > >> > > > > > > > subdirectory)
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3
> > >> > version
> > >> > > > that
> > >> > > > > > do
> > >> > > > > > > > not
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n
> component
> > of
> > >> > this
> > >> > > > > > > project.
> > >> > > > > > > > > Is
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch
> > not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > > > > correct
> > >> > > > > > > > > thing
> > >> > > > > > > > > > to be
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start
> with, I
> > >> do
> > >> > not
> > >> > > > > mind
> > >> > > > > > > > moving
> > >> > > > > > > > > > to
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> something a little more simpler. If you have
> any
> > >> > > > > > > > recommendations, I
> > >> > > > > > > > > > would
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> appreciate it.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar
> > >> Syn-Hershko <
> > >> > > > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some
> > >> form of
> > >> > > > > > > discussion
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> required.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did
> > there?
> > >> The
> > >> > > > > spatial
> > >> > > > > > > > > module
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest
> > >> spatial4j
> > >> > > > (see
> > >> > > > > > > > > > spatial4n, which
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and
> the
> > >> > Spatial
> > >> > > > > > module
> > >> > > > > > > > > > there. There
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think
> > you
> > >> > > picked
> > >> > > > > > quite
> > >> > > > > > > a
> > >> > > > > > > > > > tough task
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> as your first...
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> --
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > >> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > >> > > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <
> > >> > > > > > > > pirwin@feature23.com
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jude,
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do
> not
> > >> use
> > >> > > pull
> > >> > > > > > > requests
> > >> > > > > > > > > on
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for
> > >> something to
> > >> > > go
> > >> > > > > > > > upstream,
> > >> > > > > > > > > > let me
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push
> it
> > >> up.
> > >> > > > > > Eventually
> > >> > > > > > > we
> > >> > > > > > > > > > can get
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough progress
> > to
> > >> > make
> > >> > > it
> > >> > > > > > > > > > worthwhile. We
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the
> 4.x
> > >> work
> > >> > > as I
> > >> > > > > > don't
> > >> > > > > > > > > > think it's
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for
> > >> issues.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman
> <
> > >> > > > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial
> > >> project
> > >> > > and
> > >> > > > > > made
> > >> > > > > > > a
> > >> > > > > > > > > lot
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build
> errors
> > >> down.
> > >> > > > From
> > >> > > > > > my
> > >> > > > > > > > > > public repo
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I
> > committed
> > >> > and
> > >> > > > then
> > >> > > > > > > sent
> > >> > > > > > > > a
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub. If it does not
> > >> show
> > >> > on
> > >> > > > your
> > >> > > > > > > end,
> > >> > > > > > > > or
> > >> > > > > > > > > > I did not
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to
> > you,
> > >> > > please
> > >> > > > > let
> > >> > > > > > me
> > >> > > > > > > > > know.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete
> > the
> > >> > > > porting
> > >> > > > > of
> > >> > > > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on
> that
> > >> until
> > >> > > it
> > >> > > > is
> > >> > > > > > > > > complete?
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jude
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott
> > >> Nasser <
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude -
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we
> are
> > >> > > looking
> > >> > > > at
> > >> > > > > > > > porting
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to
> > check
> > >> > out
> > >> > > > our
> > >> > > > > > > JIRA (
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET -
> > >> > > > right
> > >> > > > > > now
> > >> > > > > > > > > it's
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket
> > for
> > >> > your
> > >> > > > > > specific
> > >> > > > > > > > > > feature).
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and
> > >> > Itamar's
> > >> > > > > help,
> > >> > > > > > > pick
> > >> > > > > > > > > > out a
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that
> feature,
> > >> and
> > >> > > then
> > >> > > > > > > create
> > >> > > > > > > > a
> > >> > > > > > > > > > pull
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> request.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for
> any
> > >> > > > > > contribuations
> > >> > > > > > > > you
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that
> > when
> > >> a
> > >> > > pull
> > >> > > > > > > request
> > >> > > > > > > > > > comes in.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a
> > >> > specific
> > >> > > > > > feature
> > >> > > > > > > > > that
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ~P
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr.
> > >> Software
> > >> > > > > Engineer
> > >> > > > > > > who
> > >> > > > > > > > > is
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> currently
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never
> worked
> > >> on
> > >> > an
> > >> > > > open
> > >> > > > > > > > source
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> project but I
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this
> > >> would
> > >> > > be a
> > >> > > > > > good
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at
> > >> > jude_bowman@hotmail.comifI
> > >> > > > > > > would
> > >> > > > > > > > > be
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> eligible to
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Jude
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> --
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Paul Irwin
> > >> > > > > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > >> > > > > > > > feature[23]
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > >> > > > > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > --
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Paul Irwin
> > >> > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > >> > > > > feature[23]
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > >> > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Paul Irwin
> > >> > > Lead Software Engineer
> > >> > > feature[23]
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > >> > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Paul Irwin
> > >> Lead Software Engineer
> > >> feature[23]
> > >>
> > >> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > >> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
I'd say we are at a stage where restructuring makes sense even if it delays
shipping the next version, if it will help us keep up with future versions
faster in the future.
There are solutions for randomized testing in .NET which don't involve
porting more stuff from Java. As far as I'm concerned we can even switch to
xUnit.NET if it makes more sense.
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:30 AM, michael herndon <mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> wrote:
> The test framework needs to be completed first. It looks likes the test
> framework is making using of external junit addins
>
> Parts of following libraries may need to be ported and nunit extended .
> https://github.com/carrotsearch/randomizedtesting (Apache 2.0)
> https://github.com/ferstl/junit-testgroups (Mit)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:41 AM, michael herndon <
> mherndon@michaelherndon.com> wrote:
>
> > These items are good ideas and should be entered into Jira as some kind
> of
> > project meta task so that decisions can be tracked and prioritized.
> >
> > With a code base of this size, each project wide change like switching
> > asserts comes at a cost and so does getting automation right.
> >
> > Is the primary goal of branch_4x to ship soon as possible? or is it to
> > increase the sustainability of the project ?
> >
> > These goals are not mutually exclusive. However, it is easier to
> > prioritize work items if there is some primary goal or agreed upon
> > prioritization of goals.
> >
> > -----------
> >
> > I'll start with getting the core test library and test framework to
> > compile and making it obvious which classes need to be converted /
> updated.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I'll let someone else drive that... haha
> >>
> >> I am not a R# user. But I did put all the logic for doing the syntax
> >> conversion in a separate library in that repo, so it should be
> relatively
> >> easy to take that and add to a plugin, I would guess.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > Cool, then I'll look into that. Any chance you can make it a R#
> plugin?
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > That is exactly what the tool I created does, it does a syntactic
> >> > > conversion only of Java to C# and does that work for you. It does
> not
> >> > > resolve symbols or anything. It should help you go a bit faster than
> >> > doing
> >> > > the syntactic conversion manually by copy-paste.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> >> itamar@code972.com
> >> > > >wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > For porting core parts of the code? sure. I just think its a waste
> >> of
> >> > > time
> >> > > > to work on porting tests, so the only thing I want to be doing is
> >> > > > copy-paste and then as few changes as possible (replacing import
> >> with
> >> > > > using, package with namespace, etc - which if we could automate
> that
> >> > > could
> >> > > > be great) and the rest should just compile and work because the
> >> tests
> >> > > > framework already supports most of what happens there.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > I like that thinking for unit tests. I wrote a quick Java to C#
> >> > > converter
> >> > > > > since Sharpen wasn't maintained that adds 1.7 support. It uses
> >> Roslyn
> >> > > for
> >> > > > > the C# generation. I used this for some of my later porting
> work.
> >> > It's
> >> > > > far
> >> > > > > from perfect, but handles most of the Java syntax correctly. It
> >> warns
> >> > > you
> >> > > > > if it encounters an unsigned right-shift or
> >> > > > > break-to-label/continue-to-label.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Repo: https://github.com/paulirwin/JavaToCSharp
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Maybe that will help?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> >> > > itamar@code972.com
> >> > > > > >wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > +1
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing framework
> >> for
> >> > > > > > Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly copy-pasted
> and
> >> > just
> >> > > > > run.
> >> > > > > > That'd probably involve many extension method and a smart base
> >> > class
> >> > > > that
> >> > > > > > will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or asserts into
> >> their C#
> >> > > > > > equivalents.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > While it makes sense to have the core comply with .NET
> >> standards, I
> >> > > see
> >> > > > > no
> >> > > > > > point in duplicating the effort for testing.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't got around to
> >> doing
> >> > > it
> >> > > > > yet.
> >> > > > > > Will be happy to help tho.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > --
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> >> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon <
> >> > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> >> > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > I don't mind working on the tests or working towards getting
> >> the
> >> > > > tests
> >> > > > > > to a
> >> > > > > > > state where they compile and pass, but I don't want to
> >> duplicate
> >> > > work
> >> > > > > > > either.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > If the the tests are not currently being worked on, then
> I'll
> >> go
> >> > > > ahead
> >> > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > > start working on getting the the Core test library into a
> >> state
> >> > > that
> >> > > > it
> >> > > > > > can
> >> > > > > > > be compiled and run tests.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <
> >> pirwin@feature23.com
> >> > >
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even today.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> >> > > > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for core at
> >> the
> >> > > > > moment?
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> >> > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> >> > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list. Keep
> >> pushing
> >> > > > > commits
> >> > > > > > > to
> >> > > > > > > > > your
> >> > > > > > > > > > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged let
> >> us
> >> > > know.
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> >> > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > > > > > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> >> > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <
> >> > > judebo@gmail.com
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira task
> for
> >> > this
> >> > > > > work:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that they
> >> can be
> >> > > > > merged
> >> > > > > > > into
> >> > > > > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > > branch. Please let me know if I should change the
> >> way I
> >> > am
> >> > > > > doing
> >> > > > > > > > > > anything
> >> > > > > > > > > > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> >> > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> Please try to commit more often...
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> --
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> >> > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> >> > > http://manning.com/synhershko/
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <
> >> > > > > judebo@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt
> the
> >> > > work I
> >> > > > > was
> >> > > > > > > > doing
> >> > > > > > > > > > in
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder to
> >> match
> >> > > > what
> >> > > > > is
> >> > > > > > > in
> >> > > > > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added
> as
> >> > well
> >> > > > as a
> >> > > > > > few
> >> > > > > > > > > other
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with fine
> >> grain,
> >> > or
> >> > > > is
> >> > > > > > > what I
> >> > > > > > > > > did
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <
> >> > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version
> from
> >> > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > lucene_solr_4_3
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> branch. located at
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I basically was attempting to
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes
> >> that
> >> > > > > already
> >> > > > > > > > > exist,
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the
> >> Spatial\BBox
> >> > > > > > > > subdirectory)
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3
> >> > version
> >> > > > that
> >> > > > > > do
> >> > > > > > > > not
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component
> of
> >> > this
> >> > > > > > > project.
> >> > > > > > > > > Is
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch
> not
> >> > the
> >> > > > > > correct
> >> > > > > > > > > thing
> >> > > > > > > > > > to be
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I
> >> do
> >> > not
> >> > > > > mind
> >> > > > > > > > moving
> >> > > > > > > > > > to
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> something a little more simpler. If you have any
> >> > > > > > > > recommendations, I
> >> > > > > > > > > > would
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> appreciate it.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar
> >> Syn-Hershko <
> >> > > > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some
> >> form of
> >> > > > > > > discussion
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> required.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did
> there?
> >> The
> >> > > > > spatial
> >> > > > > > > > > module
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest
> >> spatial4j
> >> > > > (see
> >> > > > > > > > > > spatial4n, which
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the
> >> > Spatial
> >> > > > > > module
> >> > > > > > > > > > there. There
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think
> you
> >> > > picked
> >> > > > > > quite
> >> > > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > > tough task
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> as your first...
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> --
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> >> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> >> > > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <
> >> > > > > > > > pirwin@feature23.com
> >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jude,
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not
> >> use
> >> > > pull
> >> > > > > > > requests
> >> > > > > > > > > on
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for
> >> something to
> >> > > go
> >> > > > > > > > upstream,
> >> > > > > > > > > > let me
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it
> >> up.
> >> > > > > > Eventually
> >> > > > > > > we
> >> > > > > > > > > > can get
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough progress
> to
> >> > make
> >> > > it
> >> > > > > > > > > > worthwhile. We
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x
> >> work
> >> > > as I
> >> > > > > > don't
> >> > > > > > > > > > think it's
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for
> >> issues.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <
> >> > > > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial
> >> project
> >> > > and
> >> > > > > > made
> >> > > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > lot
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build errors
> >> down.
> >> > > > From
> >> > > > > > my
> >> > > > > > > > > > public repo
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I
> committed
> >> > and
> >> > > > then
> >> > > > > > > sent
> >> > > > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub. If it does not
> >> show
> >> > on
> >> > > > your
> >> > > > > > > end,
> >> > > > > > > > or
> >> > > > > > > > > > I did not
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to
> you,
> >> > > please
> >> > > > > let
> >> > > > > > me
> >> > > > > > > > > know.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete
> the
> >> > > > porting
> >> > > > > of
> >> > > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on that
> >> until
> >> > > it
> >> > > > is
> >> > > > > > > > > complete?
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jude
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott
> >> Nasser <
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude -
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are
> >> > > looking
> >> > > > at
> >> > > > > > > > porting
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to
> check
> >> > out
> >> > > > our
> >> > > > > > > JIRA (
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET -
> >> > > > right
> >> > > > > > now
> >> > > > > > > > > it's
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket
> for
> >> > your
> >> > > > > > specific
> >> > > > > > > > > > feature).
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and
> >> > Itamar's
> >> > > > > help,
> >> > > > > > > pick
> >> > > > > > > > > > out a
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature,
> >> and
> >> > > then
> >> > > > > > > create
> >> > > > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > > pull
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> request.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any
> >> > > > > > contribuations
> >> > > > > > > > you
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that
> when
> >> a
> >> > > pull
> >> > > > > > > request
> >> > > > > > > > > > comes in.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a
> >> > specific
> >> > > > > > feature
> >> > > > > > > > > that
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ~P
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr.
> >> Software
> >> > > > > Engineer
> >> > > > > > > who
> >> > > > > > > > > is
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> currently
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked
> >> on
> >> > an
> >> > > > open
> >> > > > > > > > source
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> project but I
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this
> >> would
> >> > > be a
> >> > > > > > good
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at
> >> > jude_bowman@hotmail.comifI
> >> > > > > > > would
> >> > > > > > > > > be
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> eligible to
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Jude
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> --
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Paul Irwin
> >> > > > > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> >> > > > > > > > feature[23]
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> >> > > > > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Paul Irwin
> >> > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> >> > > > > feature[23]
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> >> > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > >
> >> > > Paul Irwin
> >> > > Lead Software Engineer
> >> > > feature[23]
> >> > >
> >> > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> >> > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Paul Irwin
> >> Lead Software Engineer
> >> feature[23]
> >>
> >> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> >> Cell: 863-698-9294
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by michael herndon <mh...@michaelherndon.com>.
The test framework needs to be completed first. It looks likes the test
framework is making using of external junit addins
Parts of following libraries may need to be ported and nunit extended .
https://github.com/carrotsearch/randomizedtesting (Apache 2.0)
https://github.com/ferstl/junit-testgroups (Mit)
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:41 AM, michael herndon <
mherndon@michaelherndon.com> wrote:
> These items are good ideas and should be entered into Jira as some kind of
> project meta task so that decisions can be tracked and prioritized.
>
> With a code base of this size, each project wide change like switching
> asserts comes at a cost and so does getting automation right.
>
> Is the primary goal of branch_4x to ship soon as possible? or is it to
> increase the sustainability of the project ?
>
> These goals are not mutually exclusive. However, it is easier to
> prioritize work items if there is some primary goal or agreed upon
> prioritization of goals.
>
> -----------
>
> I'll start with getting the core test library and test framework to
> compile and making it obvious which classes need to be converted / updated.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com> wrote:
>
>> I'll let someone else drive that... haha
>>
>> I am not a R# user. But I did put all the logic for doing the syntax
>> conversion in a separate library in that repo, so it should be relatively
>> easy to take that and add to a plugin, I would guess.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Cool, then I'll look into that. Any chance you can make it a R# plugin?
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > That is exactly what the tool I created does, it does a syntactic
>> > > conversion only of Java to C# and does that work for you. It does not
>> > > resolve symbols or anything. It should help you go a bit faster than
>> > doing
>> > > the syntactic conversion manually by copy-paste.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
>> itamar@code972.com
>> > > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > For porting core parts of the code? sure. I just think its a waste
>> of
>> > > time
>> > > > to work on porting tests, so the only thing I want to be doing is
>> > > > copy-paste and then as few changes as possible (replacing import
>> with
>> > > > using, package with namespace, etc - which if we could automate that
>> > > could
>> > > > be great) and the rest should just compile and work because the
>> tests
>> > > > framework already supports most of what happens there.
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > >
>> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > I like that thinking for unit tests. I wrote a quick Java to C#
>> > > converter
>> > > > > since Sharpen wasn't maintained that adds 1.7 support. It uses
>> Roslyn
>> > > for
>> > > > > the C# generation. I used this for some of my later porting work.
>> > It's
>> > > > far
>> > > > > from perfect, but handles most of the Java syntax correctly. It
>> warns
>> > > you
>> > > > > if it encounters an unsigned right-shift or
>> > > > > break-to-label/continue-to-label.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Repo: https://github.com/paulirwin/JavaToCSharp
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Maybe that will help?
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
>> > > itamar@code972.com
>> > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > +1
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing framework
>> for
>> > > > > > Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly copy-pasted and
>> > just
>> > > > > run.
>> > > > > > That'd probably involve many extension method and a smart base
>> > class
>> > > > that
>> > > > > > will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or asserts into
>> their C#
>> > > > > > equivalents.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > While it makes sense to have the core comply with .NET
>> standards, I
>> > > see
>> > > > > no
>> > > > > > point in duplicating the effort for testing.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't got around to
>> doing
>> > > it
>> > > > > yet.
>> > > > > > Will be happy to help tho.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
>> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>> > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon <
>> > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I don't mind working on the tests or working towards getting
>> the
>> > > > tests
>> > > > > > to a
>> > > > > > > state where they compile and pass, but I don't want to
>> duplicate
>> > > work
>> > > > > > > either.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > If the the tests are not currently being worked on, then I'll
>> go
>> > > > ahead
>> > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > start working on getting the the Core test library into a
>> state
>> > > that
>> > > > it
>> > > > > > can
>> > > > > > > be compiled and run tests.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <
>> pirwin@feature23.com
>> > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even today.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
>> > > > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for core at
>> the
>> > > > > moment?
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
>> > > > > > itamar@code972.com
>> > > > > > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list. Keep
>> pushing
>> > > > > commits
>> > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > your
>> > > > > > > > > > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged let
>> us
>> > > know.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > > > > > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
>> > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> > > > > > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
>> > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <
>> > > judebo@gmail.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira task for
>> > this
>> > > > > work:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that they
>> can be
>> > > > > merged
>> > > > > > > into
>> > > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > branch. Please let me know if I should change the
>> way I
>> > am
>> > > > > doing
>> > > > > > > > > > anything
>> > > > > > > > > > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
>> > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
>> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >> Please try to commit more often...
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >> --
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > > > > > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
>> > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>> > > > > > > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> > > > > > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <
>> > > http://manning.com/synhershko/
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <
>> > > > > judebo@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt the
>> > > work I
>> > > > > was
>> > > > > > > > doing
>> > > > > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder to
>> match
>> > > > what
>> > > > > is
>> > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added as
>> > well
>> > > > as a
>> > > > > > few
>> > > > > > > > > other
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with fine
>> grain,
>> > or
>> > > > is
>> > > > > > > what I
>> > > > > > > > > did
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <
>> > > > > judebo@gmail.com
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from
>> > the
>> > > > > > > > > > lucene_solr_4_3
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> branch. located at
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I basically was attempting to
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes
>> that
>> > > > > already
>> > > > > > > > > exist,
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the
>> Spatial\BBox
>> > > > > > > > subdirectory)
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3
>> > version
>> > > > that
>> > > > > > do
>> > > > > > > > not
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of
>> > this
>> > > > > > > project.
>> > > > > > > > > Is
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not
>> > the
>> > > > > > correct
>> > > > > > > > > thing
>> > > > > > > > > > to be
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I
>> do
>> > not
>> > > > > mind
>> > > > > > > > moving
>> > > > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> something a little more simpler. If you have any
>> > > > > > > > recommendations, I
>> > > > > > > > > > would
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> appreciate it.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar
>> Syn-Hershko <
>> > > > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some
>> form of
>> > > > > > > discussion
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> required.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did there?
>> The
>> > > > > spatial
>> > > > > > > > > module
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest
>> spatial4j
>> > > > (see
>> > > > > > > > > > spatial4n, which
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the
>> > Spatial
>> > > > > > module
>> > > > > > > > > > there. There
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think you
>> > > picked
>> > > > > > quite
>> > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > tough task
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> as your first...
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> --
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
>> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <
>> > > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <
>> > > > > > > > pirwin@feature23.com
>> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jude,
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not
>> use
>> > > pull
>> > > > > > > requests
>> > > > > > > > > on
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for
>> something to
>> > > go
>> > > > > > > > upstream,
>> > > > > > > > > > let me
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it
>> up.
>> > > > > > Eventually
>> > > > > > > we
>> > > > > > > > > > can get
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough progress to
>> > make
>> > > it
>> > > > > > > > > > worthwhile. We
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x
>> work
>> > > as I
>> > > > > > don't
>> > > > > > > > > > think it's
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for
>> issues.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <
>> > > > > > > judebo@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial
>> project
>> > > and
>> > > > > > made
>> > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > lot
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build errors
>> down.
>> > > > From
>> > > > > > my
>> > > > > > > > > > public repo
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed
>> > and
>> > > > then
>> > > > > > > sent
>> > > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub. If it does not
>> show
>> > on
>> > > > your
>> > > > > > > end,
>> > > > > > > > or
>> > > > > > > > > > I did not
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to you,
>> > > please
>> > > > > let
>> > > > > > me
>> > > > > > > > > know.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the
>> > > > porting
>> > > > > of
>> > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on that
>> until
>> > > it
>> > > > is
>> > > > > > > > > complete?
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jude
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott
>> Nasser <
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude -
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are
>> > > looking
>> > > > at
>> > > > > > > > porting
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to check
>> > out
>> > > > our
>> > > > > > > JIRA (
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET -
>> > > > right
>> > > > > > now
>> > > > > > > > > it's
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for
>> > your
>> > > > > > specific
>> > > > > > > > > > feature).
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and
>> > Itamar's
>> > > > > help,
>> > > > > > > pick
>> > > > > > > > > > out a
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature,
>> and
>> > > then
>> > > > > > > create
>> > > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > pull
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> request.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any
>> > > > > > contribuations
>> > > > > > > > you
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that when
>> a
>> > > pull
>> > > > > > > request
>> > > > > > > > > > comes in.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a
>> > specific
>> > > > > > feature
>> > > > > > > > > that
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ~P
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr.
>> Software
>> > > > > Engineer
>> > > > > > > who
>> > > > > > > > > is
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> currently
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked
>> on
>> > an
>> > > > open
>> > > > > > > > source
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> project but I
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this
>> would
>> > > be a
>> > > > > > good
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at
>> > jude_bowman@hotmail.comifI
>> > > > > > > would
>> > > > > > > > > be
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> eligible to
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Jude
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> --
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Paul Irwin
>> > > > > > > > Lead Software Engineer
>> > > > > > > > feature[23]
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
>> > > > > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Paul Irwin
>> > > > > Lead Software Engineer
>> > > > > feature[23]
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
>> > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > >
>> > > Paul Irwin
>> > > Lead Software Engineer
>> > > feature[23]
>> > >
>> > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
>> > > Cell: 863-698-9294
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Paul Irwin
>> Lead Software Engineer
>> feature[23]
>>
>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
>> Cell: 863-698-9294
>>
>
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by michael herndon <mh...@michaelherndon.com>.
These items are good ideas and should be entered into Jira as some kind of
project meta task so that decisions can be tracked and prioritized.
With a code base of this size, each project wide change like switching
asserts comes at a cost and so does getting automation right.
Is the primary goal of branch_4x to ship soon as possible? or is it to
increase the sustainability of the project ?
These goals are not mutually exclusive. However, it is easier to prioritize
work items if there is some primary goal or agreed upon prioritization of
goals.
-----------
I'll start with getting the core test library and test framework to compile
and making it obvious which classes need to be converted / updated.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com> wrote:
> I'll let someone else drive that... haha
>
> I am not a R# user. But I did put all the logic for doing the syntax
> conversion in a separate library in that repo, so it should be relatively
> easy to take that and add to a plugin, I would guess.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Cool, then I'll look into that. Any chance you can make it a R# plugin?
> >
> > --
> >
> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com> wrote:
> >
> > > That is exactly what the tool I created does, it does a syntactic
> > > conversion only of Java to C# and does that work for you. It does not
> > > resolve symbols or anything. It should help you go a bit faster than
> > doing
> > > the syntactic conversion manually by copy-paste.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> itamar@code972.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > For porting core parts of the code? sure. I just think its a waste of
> > > time
> > > > to work on porting tests, so the only thing I want to be doing is
> > > > copy-paste and then as few changes as possible (replacing import with
> > > > using, package with namespace, etc - which if we could automate that
> > > could
> > > > be great) and the rest should just compile and work because the tests
> > > > framework already supports most of what happens there.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I like that thinking for unit tests. I wrote a quick Java to C#
> > > converter
> > > > > since Sharpen wasn't maintained that adds 1.7 support. It uses
> Roslyn
> > > for
> > > > > the C# generation. I used this for some of my later porting work.
> > It's
> > > > far
> > > > > from perfect, but handles most of the Java syntax correctly. It
> warns
> > > you
> > > > > if it encounters an unsigned right-shift or
> > > > > break-to-label/continue-to-label.
> > > > >
> > > > > Repo: https://github.com/paulirwin/JavaToCSharp
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe that will help?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing framework for
> > > > > > Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly copy-pasted and
> > just
> > > > > run.
> > > > > > That'd probably involve many extension method and a smart base
> > class
> > > > that
> > > > > > will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or asserts into their
> C#
> > > > > > equivalents.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > While it makes sense to have the core comply with .NET
> standards, I
> > > see
> > > > > no
> > > > > > point in duplicating the effort for testing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't got around to
> doing
> > > it
> > > > > yet.
> > > > > > Will be happy to help tho.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko
> >
> > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon <
> > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I don't mind working on the tests or working towards getting
> the
> > > > tests
> > > > > > to a
> > > > > > > state where they compile and pass, but I don't want to
> duplicate
> > > work
> > > > > > > either.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If the the tests are not currently being worked on, then I'll
> go
> > > > ahead
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > start working on getting the the Core test library into a state
> > > that
> > > > it
> > > > > > can
> > > > > > > be compiled and run tests.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <
> pirwin@feature23.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even today.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> > > > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for core at
> the
> > > > > moment?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list. Keep
> pushing
> > > > > commits
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged let us
> > > know.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <
> > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira task for
> > this
> > > > > work:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that they can
> be
> > > > > merged
> > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > branch. Please let me know if I should change the way
> I
> > am
> > > > > doing
> > > > > > > > > > anything
> > > > > > > > > > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> Please try to commit more often...
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > > http://manning.com/synhershko/
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <
> > > > > judebo@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt the
> > > work I
> > > > > was
> > > > > > > > doing
> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> > > > > > > > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder to
> match
> > > > what
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added as
> > well
> > > > as a
> > > > > > few
> > > > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > > > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with fine
> grain,
> > or
> > > > is
> > > > > > > what I
> > > > > > > > > did
> > > > > > > > > > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <
> > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from
> > the
> > > > > > > > > > lucene_solr_4_3
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> branch. located at
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I basically was attempting to
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes
> that
> > > > > already
> > > > > > > > > exist,
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the
> Spatial\BBox
> > > > > > > > subdirectory)
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3
> > version
> > > > that
> > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of
> > this
> > > > > > > project.
> > > > > > > > > Is
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not
> > the
> > > > > > correct
> > > > > > > > > thing
> > > > > > > > > > to be
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I do
> > not
> > > > > mind
> > > > > > > > moving
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> something a little more simpler. If you have any
> > > > > > > > recommendations, I
> > > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> appreciate it.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko
> <
> > > > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form
> of
> > > > > > > discussion
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> required.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did there?
> The
> > > > > spatial
> > > > > > > > > module
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest
> spatial4j
> > > > (see
> > > > > > > > > > spatial4n, which
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the
> > Spatial
> > > > > > module
> > > > > > > > > > there. There
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think you
> > > picked
> > > > > > quite
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > tough task
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> as your first...
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> --
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <
> > > > > > > > pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jude,
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use
> > > pull
> > > > > > > requests
> > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for something
> to
> > > go
> > > > > > > > upstream,
> > > > > > > > > > let me
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it up.
> > > > > > Eventually
> > > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > > can get
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough progress to
> > make
> > > it
> > > > > > > > > > worthwhile. We
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x
> work
> > > as I
> > > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > > > think it's
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for issues.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <
> > > > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial
> project
> > > and
> > > > > > made
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > lot
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build errors
> down.
> > > > From
> > > > > > my
> > > > > > > > > > public repo
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed
> > and
> > > > then
> > > > > > > sent
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub. If it does not show
> > on
> > > > your
> > > > > > > end,
> > > > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > > I did not
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to you,
> > > please
> > > > > let
> > > > > > me
> > > > > > > > > know.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the
> > > > porting
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on that
> until
> > > it
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > > complete?
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jude
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott
> Nasser <
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude -
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are
> > > looking
> > > > at
> > > > > > > > porting
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to check
> > out
> > > > our
> > > > > > > JIRA (
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-
> > > > right
> > > > > > now
> > > > > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for
> > your
> > > > > > specific
> > > > > > > > > > feature).
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and
> > Itamar's
> > > > > help,
> > > > > > > pick
> > > > > > > > > > out a
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature,
> and
> > > then
> > > > > > > create
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > pull
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> request.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any
> > > > > > contribuations
> > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that when a
> > > pull
> > > > > > > request
> > > > > > > > > > comes in.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a
> > specific
> > > > > > feature
> > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ~P
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr.
> Software
> > > > > Engineer
> > > > > > > who
> > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> currently
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on
> > an
> > > > open
> > > > > > > > source
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> project but I
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this
> would
> > > be a
> > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at
> > jude_bowman@hotmail.comifI
> > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> eligible to
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Jude
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Paul Irwin
> > > > > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > > > > > > feature[23]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Paul Irwin
> > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > > > feature[23]
> > > > >
> > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Paul Irwin
> > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > feature[23]
> > >
> > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Paul Irwin
> Lead Software Engineer
> feature[23]
>
> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> Cell: 863-698-9294
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>.
I'll let someone else drive that... haha
I am not a R# user. But I did put all the logic for doing the syntax
conversion in a separate library in that repo, so it should be relatively
easy to take that and add to a plugin, I would guess.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>wrote:
> Cool, then I'll look into that. Any chance you can make it a R# plugin?
>
> --
>
> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com> wrote:
>
> > That is exactly what the tool I created does, it does a syntactic
> > conversion only of Java to C# and does that work for you. It does not
> > resolve symbols or anything. It should help you go a bit faster than
> doing
> > the syntactic conversion manually by copy-paste.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > For porting core parts of the code? sure. I just think its a waste of
> > time
> > > to work on porting tests, so the only thing I want to be doing is
> > > copy-paste and then as few changes as possible (replacing import with
> > > using, package with namespace, etc - which if we could automate that
> > could
> > > be great) and the rest should just compile and work because the tests
> > > framework already supports most of what happens there.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I like that thinking for unit tests. I wrote a quick Java to C#
> > converter
> > > > since Sharpen wasn't maintained that adds 1.7 support. It uses Roslyn
> > for
> > > > the C# generation. I used this for some of my later porting work.
> It's
> > > far
> > > > from perfect, but handles most of the Java syntax correctly. It warns
> > you
> > > > if it encounters an unsigned right-shift or
> > > > break-to-label/continue-to-label.
> > > >
> > > > Repo: https://github.com/paulirwin/JavaToCSharp
> > > >
> > > > Maybe that will help?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > itamar@code972.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing framework for
> > > > > Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly copy-pasted and
> just
> > > > run.
> > > > > That'd probably involve many extension method and a smart base
> class
> > > that
> > > > > will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or asserts into their C#
> > > > > equivalents.
> > > > >
> > > > > While it makes sense to have the core comply with .NET standards, I
> > see
> > > > no
> > > > > point in duplicating the effort for testing.
> > > > >
> > > > > I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't got around to doing
> > it
> > > > yet.
> > > > > Will be happy to help tho.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon <
> > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I don't mind working on the tests or working towards getting the
> > > tests
> > > > > to a
> > > > > > state where they compile and pass, but I don't want to duplicate
> > work
> > > > > > either.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If the the tests are not currently being worked on, then I'll go
> > > ahead
> > > > > and
> > > > > > start working on getting the the Core test library into a state
> > that
> > > it
> > > > > can
> > > > > > be compiled and run tests.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even today.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> > > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for core at the
> > > > moment?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list. Keep pushing
> > > > commits
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged let us
> > know.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <
> > judebo@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira task for
> this
> > > > work:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that they can be
> > > > merged
> > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > branch. Please let me know if I should change the way I
> am
> > > > doing
> > > > > > > > > anything
> > > > > > > > > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> Please try to commit more often...
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > > > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > http://manning.com/synhershko/
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <
> > > > judebo@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt the
> > work I
> > > > was
> > > > > > > doing
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> > > > > > > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder to match
> > > what
> > > > is
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added as
> well
> > > as a
> > > > > few
> > > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with fine grain,
> or
> > > is
> > > > > > what I
> > > > > > > > did
> > > > > > > > > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <
> > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from
> the
> > > > > > > > > lucene_solr_4_3
> > > > > > > > > >>>> branch. located at
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> I basically was attempting to
> > > > > > > > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes that
> > > > already
> > > > > > > > exist,
> > > > > > > > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the Spatial\BBox
> > > > > > > subdirectory)
> > > > > > > > > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> > > > > > > > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3
> version
> > > that
> > > > > do
> > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of
> this
> > > > > > project.
> > > > > > > > Is
> > > > > > > > > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not
> the
> > > > > correct
> > > > > > > > thing
> > > > > > > > > to be
> > > > > > > > > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I do
> not
> > > > mind
> > > > > > > moving
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > >>>> something a little more simpler. If you have any
> > > > > > > recommendations, I
> > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > >>>> appreciate it.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form of
> > > > > > discussion
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> required.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did there? The
> > > > spatial
> > > > > > > > module
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest spatial4j
> > > (see
> > > > > > > > > spatial4n, which
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the
> Spatial
> > > > > module
> > > > > > > > > there. There
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think you
> > picked
> > > > > quite
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > tough task
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> as your first...
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> --
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <
> > > > > > > pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jude,
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use
> > pull
> > > > > > requests
> > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for something to
> > go
> > > > > > > upstream,
> > > > > > > > > let me
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it up.
> > > > > Eventually
> > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > can get
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough progress to
> make
> > it
> > > > > > > > > worthwhile. We
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x work
> > as I
> > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > > think it's
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for issues.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <
> > > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project
> > and
> > > > > made
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > lot
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build errors down.
> > > From
> > > > > my
> > > > > > > > > public repo
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed
> and
> > > then
> > > > > > sent
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub. If it does not show
> on
> > > your
> > > > > > end,
> > > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > I did not
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to you,
> > please
> > > > let
> > > > > me
> > > > > > > > know.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the
> > > porting
> > > > of
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on that until
> > it
> > > is
> > > > > > > > complete?
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jude
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude -
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are
> > looking
> > > at
> > > > > > > porting
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to check
> out
> > > our
> > > > > > JIRA (
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET -
> > > right
> > > > > now
> > > > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for
> your
> > > > > specific
> > > > > > > > > feature).
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and
> Itamar's
> > > > help,
> > > > > > pick
> > > > > > > > > out a
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature, and
> > then
> > > > > > create
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > pull
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> request.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any
> > > > > contribuations
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that when a
> > pull
> > > > > > request
> > > > > > > > > comes in.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a
> specific
> > > > > feature
> > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ~P
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software
> > > > Engineer
> > > > > > who
> > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> currently
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on
> an
> > > open
> > > > > > > source
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> project but I
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would
> > be a
> > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at
> jude_bowman@hotmail.comifI
> > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> eligible to
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Jude
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Paul Irwin
> > > > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > > > > > feature[23]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Paul Irwin
> > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > > feature[23]
> > > >
> > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Paul Irwin
> > Lead Software Engineer
> > feature[23]
> >
> > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > Cell: 863-698-9294
> >
>
--
Paul Irwin
Lead Software Engineer
feature[23]
Email: pirwin@feature23.com
Cell: 863-698-9294
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
Cool, then I'll look into that. Any chance you can make it a R# plugin?
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com> wrote:
> That is exactly what the tool I created does, it does a syntactic
> conversion only of Java to C# and does that work for you. It does not
> resolve symbols or anything. It should help you go a bit faster than doing
> the syntactic conversion manually by copy-paste.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> >wrote:
>
> > For porting core parts of the code? sure. I just think its a waste of
> time
> > to work on porting tests, so the only thing I want to be doing is
> > copy-paste and then as few changes as possible (replacing import with
> > using, package with namespace, etc - which if we could automate that
> could
> > be great) and the rest should just compile and work because the tests
> > framework already supports most of what happens there.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I like that thinking for unit tests. I wrote a quick Java to C#
> converter
> > > since Sharpen wasn't maintained that adds 1.7 support. It uses Roslyn
> for
> > > the C# generation. I used this for some of my later porting work. It's
> > far
> > > from perfect, but handles most of the Java syntax correctly. It warns
> you
> > > if it encounters an unsigned right-shift or
> > > break-to-label/continue-to-label.
> > >
> > > Repo: https://github.com/paulirwin/JavaToCSharp
> > >
> > > Maybe that will help?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> itamar@code972.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing framework for
> > > > Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly copy-pasted and just
> > > run.
> > > > That'd probably involve many extension method and a smart base class
> > that
> > > > will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or asserts into their C#
> > > > equivalents.
> > > >
> > > > While it makes sense to have the core comply with .NET standards, I
> see
> > > no
> > > > point in duplicating the effort for testing.
> > > >
> > > > I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't got around to doing
> it
> > > yet.
> > > > Will be happy to help tho.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon <
> > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I don't mind working on the tests or working towards getting the
> > tests
> > > > to a
> > > > > state where they compile and pass, but I don't want to duplicate
> work
> > > > > either.
> > > > >
> > > > > If the the tests are not currently being worked on, then I'll go
> > ahead
> > > > and
> > > > > start working on getting the the Core test library into a state
> that
> > it
> > > > can
> > > > > be compiled and run tests.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even today.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for core at the
> > > moment?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list. Keep pushing
> > > commits
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged let us
> know.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > > >
> > > > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <
> judebo@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira task for this
> > > work:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that they can be
> > > merged
> > > > > into
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > branch. Please let me know if I should change the way I am
> > > doing
> > > > > > > > anything
> > > > > > > > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> Please try to commit more often...
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> http://manning.com/synhershko/
> > >
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <
> > > judebo@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt the
> work I
> > > was
> > > > > > doing
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> > > > > > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder to match
> > what
> > > is
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added as well
> > as a
> > > > few
> > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with fine grain, or
> > is
> > > > > what I
> > > > > > > did
> > > > > > > > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> Thanks
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <
> > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from the
> > > > > > > > lucene_solr_4_3
> > > > > > > > >>>> branch. located at
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> I basically was attempting to
> > > > > > > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes that
> > > already
> > > > > > > exist,
> > > > > > > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the Spatial\BBox
> > > > > > subdirectory)
> > > > > > > > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> > > > > > > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3 version
> > that
> > > > do
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of this
> > > > > project.
> > > > > > > Is
> > > > > > > > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not the
> > > > correct
> > > > > > > thing
> > > > > > > > to be
> > > > > > > > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I do not
> > > mind
> > > > > > moving
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > >>>> something a little more simpler. If you have any
> > > > > > recommendations, I
> > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > >>>> appreciate it.
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > > > > >>>> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form of
> > > > > discussion
> > > > > > > > >>>>> required.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did there? The
> > > spatial
> > > > > > > module
> > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest spatial4j
> > (see
> > > > > > > > spatial4n, which
> > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the Spatial
> > > > module
> > > > > > > > there. There
> > > > > > > > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think you
> picked
> > > > quite
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > tough task
> > > > > > > > >>>>> as your first...
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> --
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > > > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <
> > > > > > pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jude,
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use
> pull
> > > > > requests
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for something to
> go
> > > > > > upstream,
> > > > > > > > let me
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it up.
> > > > Eventually
> > > > > we
> > > > > > > > can get
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough progress to make
> it
> > > > > > > > worthwhile. We
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x work
> as I
> > > > don't
> > > > > > > > think it's
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for issues.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <
> > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project
> and
> > > > made
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > lot
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build errors down.
> > From
> > > > my
> > > > > > > > public repo
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and
> > then
> > > > > sent
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub. If it does not show on
> > your
> > > > > end,
> > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > I did not
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to you,
> please
> > > let
> > > > me
> > > > > > > know.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the
> > porting
> > > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on that until
> it
> > is
> > > > > > > complete?
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jude
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude -
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are
> looking
> > at
> > > > > > porting
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to check out
> > our
> > > > > JIRA (
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET -
> > right
> > > > now
> > > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for your
> > > > specific
> > > > > > > > feature).
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's
> > > help,
> > > > > pick
> > > > > > > > out a
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature, and
> then
> > > > > create
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > pull
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> request.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any
> > > > contribuations
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that when a
> pull
> > > > > request
> > > > > > > > comes in.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific
> > > > feature
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ~P
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software
> > > Engineer
> > > > > who
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> currently
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an
> > open
> > > > > > source
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> project but I
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would
> be a
> > > > good
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.comifI
> > > > > would
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> eligible to
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Jude
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Paul Irwin
> > > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > > > > feature[23]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Paul Irwin
> > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > feature[23]
> > >
> > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Paul Irwin
> Lead Software Engineer
> feature[23]
>
> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> Cell: 863-698-9294
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>.
That is exactly what the tool I created does, it does a syntactic
conversion only of Java to C# and does that work for you. It does not
resolve symbols or anything. It should help you go a bit faster than doing
the syntactic conversion manually by copy-paste.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>wrote:
> For porting core parts of the code? sure. I just think its a waste of time
> to work on porting tests, so the only thing I want to be doing is
> copy-paste and then as few changes as possible (replacing import with
> using, package with namespace, etc - which if we could automate that could
> be great) and the rest should just compile and work because the tests
> framework already supports most of what happens there.
>
> --
>
> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com> wrote:
>
> > I like that thinking for unit tests. I wrote a quick Java to C# converter
> > since Sharpen wasn't maintained that adds 1.7 support. It uses Roslyn for
> > the C# generation. I used this for some of my later porting work. It's
> far
> > from perfect, but handles most of the Java syntax correctly. It warns you
> > if it encounters an unsigned right-shift or
> > break-to-label/continue-to-label.
> >
> > Repo: https://github.com/paulirwin/JavaToCSharp
> >
> > Maybe that will help?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing framework for
> > > Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly copy-pasted and just
> > run.
> > > That'd probably involve many extension method and a smart base class
> that
> > > will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or asserts into their C#
> > > equivalents.
> > >
> > > While it makes sense to have the core comply with .NET standards, I see
> > no
> > > point in duplicating the effort for testing.
> > >
> > > I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't got around to doing it
> > yet.
> > > Will be happy to help tho.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon <
> > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I don't mind working on the tests or working towards getting the
> tests
> > > to a
> > > > state where they compile and pass, but I don't want to duplicate work
> > > > either.
> > > >
> > > > If the the tests are not currently being worked on, then I'll go
> ahead
> > > and
> > > > start working on getting the the Core test library into a state that
> it
> > > can
> > > > be compiled and run tests.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even today.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for core at the
> > moment?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list. Keep pushing
> > commits
> > > > to
> > > > > > your
> > > > > > > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged let us know.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > >
> > > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <judebo@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira task for this
> > work:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that they can be
> > merged
> > > > into
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > branch. Please let me know if I should change the way I am
> > doing
> > > > > > > anything
> > > > > > > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Please try to commit more often...
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/
> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <
> > judebo@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt the work I
> > was
> > > > > doing
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> > > > > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder to match
> what
> > is
> > > > in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added as well
> as a
> > > few
> > > > > > other
> > > > > > > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with fine grain, or
> is
> > > > what I
> > > > > > did
> > > > > > > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Thanks
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <
> > judebo@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from the
> > > > > > > lucene_solr_4_3
> > > > > > > >>>> branch. located at
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I basically was attempting to
> > > > > > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes that
> > already
> > > > > > exist,
> > > > > > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the Spatial\BBox
> > > > > subdirectory)
> > > > > > > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> > > > > > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3 version
> that
> > > do
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of this
> > > > project.
> > > > > > Is
> > > > > > > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not the
> > > correct
> > > > > > thing
> > > > > > > to be
> > > > > > > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I do not
> > mind
> > > > > moving
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > >>>> something a little more simpler. If you have any
> > > > > recommendations, I
> > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > >>>> appreciate it.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Thanks
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > > > >>>> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form of
> > > > discussion
> > > > > > > >>>>> required.
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did there? The
> > spatial
> > > > > > module
> > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest spatial4j
> (see
> > > > > > > spatial4n, which
> > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the Spatial
> > > module
> > > > > > > there. There
> > > > > > > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think you picked
> > > quite
> > > > a
> > > > > > > tough task
> > > > > > > >>>>> as your first...
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> --
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <
> > > > > pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Jude,
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use pull
> > > > requests
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for something to go
> > > > > upstream,
> > > > > > > let me
> > > > > > > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it up.
> > > Eventually
> > > > we
> > > > > > > can get
> > > > > > > >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough progress to make it
> > > > > > > worthwhile. We
> > > > > > > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x work as I
> > > don't
> > > > > > > think it's
> > > > > > > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for issues.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <
> > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project and
> > > made
> > > > a
> > > > > > lot
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build errors down.
> From
> > > my
> > > > > > > public repo
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and
> then
> > > > sent
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub. If it does not show on
> your
> > > > end,
> > > > > or
> > > > > > > I did not
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to you, please
> > let
> > > me
> > > > > > know.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the
> porting
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on that until it
> is
> > > > > > complete?
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jude
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude -
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking
> at
> > > > > porting
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to check out
> our
> > > > JIRA (
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET -
> right
> > > now
> > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for your
> > > specific
> > > > > > > feature).
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's
> > help,
> > > > pick
> > > > > > > out a
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature, and then
> > > > create
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > pull
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> request.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any
> > > contribuations
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull
> > > > request
> > > > > > > comes in.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific
> > > feature
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ~P
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software
> > Engineer
> > > > who
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> currently
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an
> open
> > > > > source
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> project but I
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a
> > > good
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.comif I
> > > > would
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> eligible to
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Jude
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> > > > > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Paul Irwin
> > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > > > feature[23]
> > > > >
> > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Paul Irwin
> > Lead Software Engineer
> > feature[23]
> >
> > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > Cell: 863-698-9294
> >
>
--
Paul Irwin
Lead Software Engineer
feature[23]
Email: pirwin@feature23.com
Cell: 863-698-9294
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
For porting core parts of the code? sure. I just think its a waste of time
to work on porting tests, so the only thing I want to be doing is
copy-paste and then as few changes as possible (replacing import with
using, package with namespace, etc - which if we could automate that could
be great) and the rest should just compile and work because the tests
framework already supports most of what happens there.
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com> wrote:
> I like that thinking for unit tests. I wrote a quick Java to C# converter
> since Sharpen wasn't maintained that adds 1.7 support. It uses Roslyn for
> the C# generation. I used this for some of my later porting work. It's far
> from perfect, but handles most of the Java syntax correctly. It warns you
> if it encounters an unsigned right-shift or
> break-to-label/continue-to-label.
>
> Repo: https://github.com/paulirwin/JavaToCSharp
>
> Maybe that will help?
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> >wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing framework for
> > Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly copy-pasted and just
> run.
> > That'd probably involve many extension method and a smart base class that
> > will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or asserts into their C#
> > equivalents.
> >
> > While it makes sense to have the core comply with .NET standards, I see
> no
> > point in duplicating the effort for testing.
> >
> > I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't got around to doing it
> yet.
> > Will be happy to help tho.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon <
> > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > I don't mind working on the tests or working towards getting the tests
> > to a
> > > state where they compile and pass, but I don't want to duplicate work
> > > either.
> > >
> > > If the the tests are not currently being worked on, then I'll go ahead
> > and
> > > start working on getting the the Core test library into a state that it
> > can
> > > be compiled and run tests.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even today.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for core at the
> moment?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list. Keep pushing
> commits
> > > to
> > > > > your
> > > > > > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged let us know.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko
> >
> > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira task for this
> work:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that they can be
> merged
> > > into
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > branch. Please let me know if I should change the way I am
> doing
> > > > > > anything
> > > > > > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Please try to commit more often...
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <
> judebo@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt the work I
> was
> > > > doing
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> > > > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder to match what
> is
> > > in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added as well as a
> > few
> > > > > other
> > > > > > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with fine grain, or is
> > > what I
> > > > > did
> > > > > > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Thanks
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <
> judebo@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from the
> > > > > > lucene_solr_4_3
> > > > > > >>>> branch. located at
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> I basically was attempting to
> > > > > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes that
> already
> > > > > exist,
> > > > > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the Spatial\BBox
> > > > subdirectory)
> > > > > > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> > > > > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3 version that
> > do
> > > > not
> > > > > > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of this
> > > project.
> > > > > Is
> > > > > > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not the
> > correct
> > > > > thing
> > > > > > to be
> > > > > > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I do not
> mind
> > > > moving
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > >>>> something a little more simpler. If you have any
> > > > recommendations, I
> > > > > > would
> > > > > > >>>> appreciate it.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Thanks
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > > >>>> > wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form of
> > > discussion
> > > > > > >>>>> required.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did there? The
> spatial
> > > > > module
> > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest spatial4j (see
> > > > > > spatial4n, which
> > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the Spatial
> > module
> > > > > > there. There
> > > > > > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think you picked
> > quite
> > > a
> > > > > > tough task
> > > > > > >>>>> as your first...
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> --
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > > > >
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <
> > > > pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Jude,
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use pull
> > > requests
> > > > > on
> > > > > > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for something to go
> > > > upstream,
> > > > > > let me
> > > > > > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it up.
> > Eventually
> > > we
> > > > > > can get
> > > > > > >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough progress to make it
> > > > > > worthwhile. We
> > > > > > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x work as I
> > don't
> > > > > > think it's
> > > > > > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for issues.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <
> > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project and
> > made
> > > a
> > > > > lot
> > > > > > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build errors down. From
> > my
> > > > > > public repo
> > > > > > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and then
> > > sent
> > > > a
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub. If it does not show on your
> > > end,
> > > > or
> > > > > > I did not
> > > > > > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to you, please
> let
> > me
> > > > > know.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the porting
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on that until it is
> > > > > complete?
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Jude
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <
> > > > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude -
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at
> > > > porting
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to check out our
> > > JIRA (
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right
> > now
> > > > > it's
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for your
> > specific
> > > > > > feature).
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's
> help,
> > > pick
> > > > > > out a
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature, and then
> > > create
> > > > a
> > > > > > pull
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> request.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any
> > contribuations
> > > > you
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull
> > > request
> > > > > > comes in.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific
> > feature
> > > > > that
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> ~P
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software
> Engineer
> > > who
> > > > > is
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> currently
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open
> > > > source
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> project but I
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a
> > good
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I
> > > would
> > > > > be
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> eligible to
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Jude
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> > > > > > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> > > > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Paul Irwin
> > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > > feature[23]
> > > >
> > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Paul Irwin
> Lead Software Engineer
> feature[23]
>
> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> Cell: 863-698-9294
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>.
I like that thinking for unit tests. I wrote a quick Java to C# converter
since Sharpen wasn't maintained that adds 1.7 support. It uses Roslyn for
the C# generation. I used this for some of my later porting work. It's far
from perfect, but handles most of the Java syntax correctly. It warns you
if it encounters an unsigned right-shift or
break-to-label/continue-to-label.
Repo: https://github.com/paulirwin/JavaToCSharp
Maybe that will help?
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>wrote:
> +1
>
> What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing framework for
> Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly copy-pasted and just run.
> That'd probably involve many extension method and a smart base class that
> will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or asserts into their C#
> equivalents.
>
> While it makes sense to have the core comply with .NET standards, I see no
> point in duplicating the effort for testing.
>
> I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't got around to doing it yet.
> Will be happy to help tho.
>
> --
>
> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon <
> mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > wrote:
>
> > I don't mind working on the tests or working towards getting the tests
> to a
> > state where they compile and pass, but I don't want to duplicate work
> > either.
> >
> > If the the tests are not currently being worked on, then I'll go ahead
> and
> > start working on getting the the Core test library into a state that it
> can
> > be compiled and run tests.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even today.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for core at the moment?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> itamar@code972.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list. Keep pushing commits
> > to
> > > > your
> > > > > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged let us know.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira task for this work:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that they can be merged
> > into
> > > > the
> > > > > > branch. Please let me know if I should change the way I am doing
> > > > > anything
> > > > > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Please try to commit more often...
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt the work I was
> > > doing
> > > > > in
> > > > > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> > > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder to match what is
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added as well as a
> few
> > > > other
> > > > > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with fine grain, or is
> > what I
> > > > did
> > > > > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Thanks
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <judebo@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from the
> > > > > lucene_solr_4_3
> > > > > >>>> branch. located at
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> I basically was attempting to
> > > > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes that already
> > > > exist,
> > > > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the Spatial\BBox
> > > subdirectory)
> > > > > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> > > > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3 version that
> do
> > > not
> > > > > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of this
> > project.
> > > > Is
> > > > > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not the
> correct
> > > > thing
> > > > > to be
> > > > > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I do not mind
> > > moving
> > > > > to
> > > > > >>>> something a little more simpler. If you have any
> > > recommendations, I
> > > > > would
> > > > > >>>> appreciate it.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Thanks
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > >>>> > wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form of
> > discussion
> > > > > >>>>> required.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did there? The spatial
> > > > module
> > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest spatial4j (see
> > > > > spatial4n, which
> > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the Spatial
> module
> > > > > there. There
> > > > > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think you picked
> quite
> > a
> > > > > tough task
> > > > > >>>>> as your first...
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> --
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > > >
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <
> > > pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Jude,
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use pull
> > requests
> > > > on
> > > > > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for something to go
> > > upstream,
> > > > > let me
> > > > > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it up.
> Eventually
> > we
> > > > > can get
> > > > > >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough progress to make it
> > > > > worthwhile. We
> > > > > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x work as I
> don't
> > > > > think it's
> > > > > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for issues.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <
> > judebo@gmail.com
> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project and
> made
> > a
> > > > lot
> > > > > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build errors down. From
> my
> > > > > public repo
> > > > > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and then
> > sent
> > > a
> > > > > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub. If it does not show on your
> > end,
> > > or
> > > > > I did not
> > > > > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to you, please let
> me
> > > > know.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the porting of
> > the
> > > > > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on that until it is
> > > > complete?
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Jude
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <
> > > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude -
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at
> > > porting
> > > > > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to check out our
> > JIRA (
> > > > > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right
> now
> > > > it's
> > > > > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for your
> specific
> > > > > feature).
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help,
> > pick
> > > > > out a
> > > > > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature, and then
> > create
> > > a
> > > > > pull
> > > > > >>>>>>>> request.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any
> contribuations
> > > you
> > > > > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull
> > request
> > > > > comes in.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific
> feature
> > > > that
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> ~P
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > > > > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > > > > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > > > > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer
> > who
> > > > is
> > > > > >>>>>>>> currently
> > > > > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open
> > > source
> > > > > >>>>>>>> project but I
> > > > > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a
> good
> > > > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
> > > > > >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I
> > would
> > > > be
> > > > > >>>>>>>> eligible to
> > > > > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > >>>>>>>> > Jude
> > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> > > > > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> > > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Paul Irwin
> > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > feature[23]
> > >
> > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > >
> >
>
--
Paul Irwin
Lead Software Engineer
feature[23]
Email: pirwin@feature23.com
Cell: 863-698-9294
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
+1
What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing framework for
Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly copy-pasted and just run.
That'd probably involve many extension method and a smart base class that
will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or asserts into their C#
equivalents.
While it makes sense to have the core comply with .NET standards, I see no
point in duplicating the effort for testing.
I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't got around to doing it yet.
Will be happy to help tho.
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon <mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> wrote:
> I don't mind working on the tests or working towards getting the tests to a
> state where they compile and pass, but I don't want to duplicate work
> either.
>
> If the the tests are not currently being worked on, then I'll go ahead and
> start working on getting the the Core test library into a state that it can
> be compiled and run tests.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com> wrote:
>
> > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even today.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for core at the moment?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list. Keep pushing commits
> to
> > > your
> > > > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged let us know.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira task for this work:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> > > > >
> > > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that they can be merged
> into
> > > the
> > > > > branch. Please let me know if I should change the way I am doing
> > > > anything
> > > > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > itamar@code972.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Please try to commit more often...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt the work I was
> > doing
> > > > in
> > > > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder to match what is
> in
> > > the
> > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added as well as a few
> > > other
> > > > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with fine grain, or is
> what I
> > > did
> > > > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thanks
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from the
> > > > lucene_solr_4_3
> > > > >>>> branch. located at
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I basically was attempting to
> > > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes that already
> > > exist,
> > > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the Spatial\BBox
> > subdirectory)
> > > > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> > > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3 version that do
> > not
> > > > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of this
> project.
> > > Is
> > > > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not the correct
> > > thing
> > > > to be
> > > > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I do not mind
> > moving
> > > > to
> > > > >>>> something a little more simpler. If you have any
> > recommendations, I
> > > > would
> > > > >>>> appreciate it.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Thanks
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > >>>> > wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form of
> discussion
> > > > >>>>> required.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did there? The spatial
> > > module
> > > > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest spatial4j (see
> > > > spatial4n, which
> > > > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the Spatial module
> > > > there. There
> > > > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think you picked quite
> a
> > > > tough task
> > > > >>>>> as your first...
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > >
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <
> > pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Jude,
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use pull
> requests
> > > on
> > > > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for something to go
> > upstream,
> > > > let me
> > > > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it up. Eventually
> we
> > > > can get
> > > > >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough progress to make it
> > > > worthwhile. We
> > > > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x work as I don't
> > > > think it's
> > > > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for issues.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <
> judebo@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project and made
> a
> > > lot
> > > > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build errors down. From my
> > > > public repo
> > > > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and then
> sent
> > a
> > > > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub. If it does not show on your
> end,
> > or
> > > > I did not
> > > > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to you, please let me
> > > know.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the porting of
> the
> > > > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on that until it is
> > > complete?
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Jude
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <
> > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Jude -
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at
> > porting
> > > > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to check out our
> JIRA (
> > > > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now
> > > it's
> > > > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific
> > > > feature).
> > > > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help,
> pick
> > > > out a
> > > > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature, and then
> create
> > a
> > > > pull
> > > > >>>>>>>> request.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations
> > you
> > > > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull
> request
> > > > comes in.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature
> > > that
> > > > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> ~P
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > > > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > > > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > > > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer
> who
> > > is
> > > > >>>>>>>> currently
> > > > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open
> > source
> > > > >>>>>>>> project but I
> > > > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good
> > > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
> > > > >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I
> would
> > > be
> > > > >>>>>>>> eligible to
> > > > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> > Jude
> > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> > > > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Paul Irwin
> > Lead Software Engineer
> > feature[23]
> >
> > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > Cell: 863-698-9294
> >
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>.
I think that would be a valuable use of time. We're currently working off
the lucene_solr_4_3 upstream release branch so you can use that for the
java source to port.
On Mar 6, 2014 10:14 AM, "michael herndon" <mh...@michaelherndon.com>
wrote:
> I don't mind working on the tests or working towards getting the tests to a
> state where they compile and pass, but I don't want to duplicate work
> either.
>
> If the the tests are not currently being worked on, then I'll go ahead and
> start working on getting the the Core test library into a state that it can
> be compiled and run tests.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com> wrote:
>
> > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even today.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for core at the moment?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list. Keep pushing commits
> to
> > > your
> > > > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged let us know.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira task for this work:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> > > > >
> > > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that they can be merged
> into
> > > the
> > > > > branch. Please let me know if I should change the way I am doing
> > > > anything
> > > > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > itamar@code972.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Please try to commit more often...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt the work I was
> > doing
> > > > in
> > > > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder to match what is
> in
> > > the
> > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added as well as a few
> > > other
> > > > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with fine grain, or is
> what I
> > > did
> > > > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thanks
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from the
> > > > lucene_solr_4_3
> > > > >>>> branch. located at
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I basically was attempting to
> > > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes that already
> > > exist,
> > > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the Spatial\BBox
> > subdirectory)
> > > > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> > > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3 version that do
> > not
> > > > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of this
> project.
> > > Is
> > > > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not the correct
> > > thing
> > > > to be
> > > > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I do not mind
> > moving
> > > > to
> > > > >>>> something a little more simpler. If you have any
> > recommendations, I
> > > > would
> > > > >>>> appreciate it.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Thanks
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > >>>> > wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form of
> discussion
> > > > >>>>> required.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did there? The spatial
> > > module
> > > > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest spatial4j (see
> > > > spatial4n, which
> > > > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the Spatial module
> > > > there. There
> > > > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think you picked quite
> a
> > > > tough task
> > > > >>>>> as your first...
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > >
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <
> > pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Jude,
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use pull
> requests
> > > on
> > > > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for something to go
> > upstream,
> > > > let me
> > > > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it up. Eventually
> we
> > > > can get
> > > > >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough progress to make it
> > > > worthwhile. We
> > > > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x work as I don't
> > > > think it's
> > > > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for issues.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <
> judebo@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project and made
> a
> > > lot
> > > > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build errors down. From my
> > > > public repo
> > > > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and then
> sent
> > a
> > > > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub. If it does not show on your
> end,
> > or
> > > > I did not
> > > > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to you, please let me
> > > know.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the porting of
> the
> > > > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on that until it is
> > > complete?
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Jude
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <
> > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Jude -
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at
> > porting
> > > > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to check out our
> JIRA (
> > > > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now
> > > it's
> > > > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific
> > > > feature).
> > > > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help,
> pick
> > > > out a
> > > > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature, and then
> create
> > a
> > > > pull
> > > > >>>>>>>> request.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations
> > you
> > > > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull
> request
> > > > comes in.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature
> > > that
> > > > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> ~P
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > > > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > > > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > > > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer
> who
> > > is
> > > > >>>>>>>> currently
> > > > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open
> > source
> > > > >>>>>>>> project but I
> > > > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good
> > > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
> > > > >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I
> would
> > > be
> > > > >>>>>>>> eligible to
> > > > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> > Jude
> > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> > > > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Paul Irwin
> > Lead Software Engineer
> > feature[23]
> >
> > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > Cell: 863-698-9294
> >
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by michael herndon <mh...@michaelherndon.com>.
I don't mind working on the tests or working towards getting the tests to a
state where they compile and pass, but I don't want to duplicate work
either.
If the the tests are not currently being worked on, then I'll go ahead and
start working on getting the the Core test library into a state that it can
be compiled and run tests.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com> wrote:
> I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even today.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for core at the moment?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list. Keep pushing commits to
> > your
> > > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged let us know.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira task for this work:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> > > >
> > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that they can be merged into
> > the
> > > > branch. Please let me know if I should change the way I am doing
> > > anything
> > > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> itamar@code972.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Please try to commit more often...
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >>
> > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt the work I was
> doing
> > > in
> > > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder to match what is in
> > the
> > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added as well as a few
> > other
> > > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with fine grain, or is what I
> > did
> > > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from the
> > > lucene_solr_4_3
> > > >>>> branch. located at
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I basically was attempting to
> > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes that already
> > exist,
> > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the Spatial\BBox
> subdirectory)
> > > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3 version that do
> not
> > > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of this project.
> > Is
> > > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not the correct
> > thing
> > > to be
> > > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I do not mind
> moving
> > > to
> > > >>>> something a little more simpler. If you have any
> recommendations, I
> > > would
> > > >>>> appreciate it.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > itamar@code972.com
> > > >>>> > wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form of discussion
> > > >>>>> required.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did there? The spatial
> > module
> > > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest spatial4j (see
> > > spatial4n, which
> > > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the Spatial module
> > > there. There
> > > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think you picked quite a
> > > tough task
> > > >>>>> as your first...
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> --
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko
> >
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <
> pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Jude,
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use pull requests
> > on
> > > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for something to go
> upstream,
> > > let me
> > > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it up. Eventually we
> > > can get
> > > >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough progress to make it
> > > worthwhile. We
> > > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x work as I don't
> > > think it's
> > > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for issues.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <judebo@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project and made a
> > lot
> > > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build errors down. From my
> > > public repo
> > > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and then sent
> a
> > > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub. If it does not show on your end,
> or
> > > I did not
> > > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to you, please let me
> > know.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the porting of the
> > > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on that until it is
> > complete?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Jude
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <
> > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Jude -
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at
> porting
> > > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (
> > > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now
> > it's
> > > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific
> > > feature).
> > > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick
> > > out a
> > > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature, and then create
> a
> > > pull
> > > >>>>>>>> request.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations
> you
> > > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request
> > > comes in.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature
> > that
> > > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> ~P
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who
> > is
> > > >>>>>>>> currently
> > > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open
> source
> > > >>>>>>>> project but I
> > > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good
> > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
> > > >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would
> > be
> > > >>>>>>>> eligible to
> > > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > >>>>>>>> > Jude
> > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> > > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Paul Irwin
> Lead Software Engineer
> feature[23]
>
> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> Cell: 863-698-9294
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>.
I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even today.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> wrote:
> Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for core at the moment?
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list. Keep pushing commits to
> your
> > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged let us know.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira task for this work:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> > >
> > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that they can be merged into
> the
> > > branch. Please let me know if I should change the way I am doing
> > anything
> > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Please try to commit more often...
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt the work I was doing
> > in
> > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder to match what is in
> the
> > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> > >>>
> > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added as well as a few
> other
> > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> > >>>
> > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with fine grain, or is what I
> did
> > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from the
> > lucene_solr_4_3
> > >>>> branch. located at
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I basically was attempting to
> > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes that already
> exist,
> > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the Spatial\BBox subdirectory)
> > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3 version that do not
> > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of this project.
> Is
> > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not the correct
> thing
> > to be
> > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I do not mind moving
> > to
> > >>>> something a little more simpler. If you have any recommendations, I
> > would
> > >>>> appreciate it.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > itamar@code972.com
> > >>>> > wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form of discussion
> > >>>>> required.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did there? The spatial
> module
> > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest spatial4j (see
> > spatial4n, which
> > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the Spatial module
> > there. There
> > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think you picked quite a
> > tough task
> > >>>>> as your first...
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com
> > >wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Jude,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use pull requests
> on
> > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for something to go upstream,
> > let me
> > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it up. Eventually we
> > can get
> > >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough progress to make it
> > worthwhile. We
> > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x work as I don't
> > think it's
> > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for issues.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <judebo@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project and made a
> lot
> > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build errors down. From my
> > public repo
> > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and then sent a
> > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub. If it does not show on your end, or
> > I did not
> > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to you, please let me
> know.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the porting of the
> > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on that until it is
> complete?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Jude
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <
> > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Jude -
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at porting
> > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> > >>>>>>>>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (
> > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now
> it's
> > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific
> > feature).
> > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick
> > out a
> > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature, and then create a
> > pull
> > >>>>>>>> request.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations you
> > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request
> > comes in.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature
> that
> > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> ~P
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > >>>>>>>> >
> > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who
> is
> > >>>>>>>> currently
> > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source
> > >>>>>>>> project but I
> > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good
> > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
> > >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would
> be
> > >>>>>>>> eligible to
> > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> > >>>>>>>> >
> > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> > >>>>>>>> >
> > >>>>>>>> > Jude
> > >>>>>>>> >
> > >>>>>>>> >
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> > >>>>>> feature[23]
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
--
Paul Irwin
Lead Software Engineer
feature[23]
Email: pirwin@feature23.com
Cell: 863-698-9294
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by michael herndon <mh...@michaelherndon.com>.
Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for core at the moment?
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>wrote:
> Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list. Keep pushing commits to your
> branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged let us know.
>
> --
>
> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira task for this work:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> >
> > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that they can be merged into the
> > branch. Please let me know if I should change the way I am doing
> anything
> > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Please try to commit more often...
> >>
> >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt the work I was doing
> in
> >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder to match what is in the
> >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> >>>
> >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added as well as a few other
> >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> >>>
> >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with fine grain, or is what I did
> >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from the
> lucene_solr_4_3
> >>>> branch. located at
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> >>>>
> >>>> I basically was attempting to
> >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes that already exist,
> >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the Spatial\BBox subdirectory)
> >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3 version that do not
> >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> >>>>
> >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of this project. Is
> >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not the correct thing
> to be
> >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> >>>>
> >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I do not mind moving
> to
> >>>> something a little more simpler. If you have any recommendations, I
> would
> >>>> appreciate it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> itamar@code972.com
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form of discussion
> >>>>> required.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did there? The spatial module
> >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest spatial4j (see
> spatial4n, which
> >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the Spatial module
> there. There
> >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think you picked quite a
> tough task
> >>>>> as your first...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com
> >wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Jude,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use pull requests on
> >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for something to go upstream,
> let me
> >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it up. Eventually we
> can get
> >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough progress to make it
> worthwhile. We
> >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x work as I don't
> think it's
> >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for issues.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <judebo@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project and made a lot
> >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build errors down. From my
> public repo
> >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and then sent a
> >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub. If it does not show on your end, or
> I did not
> >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to you, please let me know.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the porting of the
> >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on that until it is complete?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jude
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <
> >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Jude -
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at porting
> >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> >>>>>>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now it's
> >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific
> feature).
> >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick
> out a
> >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature, and then create a
> pull
> >>>>>>>> request.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations you
> >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request
> comes in.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature that
> >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ~P
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> >>>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who is
> >>>>>>>> currently
> >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source
> >>>>>>>> project but I
> >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good
> >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
> >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would be
> >>>>>>>> eligible to
> >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> >>>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> >>>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>> > Jude
> >>>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> >>>>>> feature[23]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list. Keep pushing commits to your
branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged let us know.
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira task for this work:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
>
> I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that they can be merged into the
> branch. Please let me know if I should change the way I am doing anything
> or any other feedback that may be helpful.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>wrote:
>
>> Please try to commit more often...
>>
>> Thanks for putting an effort on this
>>
>> --
>>
>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt the work I was doing in
>>> Spatial and started adding classes to
>>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder to match what is in the
>>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
>>>
>>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added as well as a few other
>>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
>>>
>>> Is it preferable to commit more often with fine grain, or is what I did
>>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from the lucene_solr_4_3
>>>> branch. located at
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
>>>>
>>>> I basically was attempting to
>>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes that already exist,
>>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the Spatial\BBox subdirectory)
>>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
>>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3 version that do not
>>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
>>>>
>>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of this project. Is
>>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not the correct thing to be
>>>> doing for this Spatial project?
>>>>
>>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I do not mind moving to
>>>> something a little more simpler. If you have any recommendations, I would
>>>> appreciate it.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form of discussion
>>>>> required.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did there? The spatial module
>>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest spatial4j (see spatial4n, which
>>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the Spatial module there. There
>>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think you picked quite a tough task
>>>>> as your first...
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
>>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>>>>>
>>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
>>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jude,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use pull requests on
>>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for something to go upstream, let me
>>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it up. Eventually we can get
>>>>>> you commit access if you make enough progress to make it worthwhile. We
>>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x work as I don't think it's
>>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project and made a lot
>>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build errors down. From my public repo
>>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and then sent a
>>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub. If it does not show on your end, or I did not
>>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to you, please let me know.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the porting of the
>>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on that until it is complete?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jude
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <
>>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jude -
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at porting
>>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now it's
>>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific feature).
>>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick out a
>>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature, and then create a pull
>>>>>>>> request.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations you
>>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request comes in.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature that
>>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ~P
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
>>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
>>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who is
>>>>>>>> currently
>>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source
>>>>>>>> project but I
>>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good
>>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
>>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would be
>>>>>>>> eligible to
>>>>>>>> > contribute.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Thanks!
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Jude
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paul Irwin
>>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
>>>>>> feature[23]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
>>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>.
Ok, thanks for the feedback. I added a Jira task for this work:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that they can be merged into the
branch. Please let me know if I should change the way I am doing anything
or any other feedback that may be helpful.
Thanks
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>wrote:
> Please try to commit more often...
>
> Thanks for putting an effort on this
>
> --
>
> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt the work I was doing in
>> Spatial and started adding classes to
>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder to match what is in the
>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
>>
>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added as well as a few other
>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
>>
>> Is it preferable to commit more often with fine grain, or is what I did
>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from the lucene_solr_4_3
>>> branch. located at
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
>>>
>>> I basically was attempting to
>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes that already exist,
>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the Spatial\BBox subdirectory) that
>>> do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3 version that do not
>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
>>>
>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of this project. Is
>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not the correct thing to be
>>> doing for this Spatial project?
>>>
>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I do not mind moving to
>>> something a little more simpler. If you have any recommendations, I would
>>> appreciate it.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form of discussion
>>>> required.
>>>>
>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did there? The spatial module
>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest spatial4j (see spatial4n, which
>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the Spatial module there. There
>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think you picked quite a tough task
>>>> as your first...
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>>>>
>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jude,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use pull requests on
>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for something to go upstream, let me
>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it up. Eventually we can get
>>>>> you commit access if you make enough progress to make it worthwhile. We
>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x work as I don't think it's
>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for issues.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project and made a lot of
>>>>>> progress to get the number of build errors down. From my public repo where
>>>>>> I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and then sent a Pull
>>>>>> request through GitHub. If it does not show on your end, or I did not
>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to you, please let me know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the porting of the
>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on that until it is complete?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jude
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <
>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jude -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at porting 4.0
>>>>>>> over (take a look at this page)
>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now it's
>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific feature).
>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick out a
>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature, and then create a pull
>>>>>>> request.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations you
>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request comes in.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature that
>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ~P
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who is
>>>>>>> currently
>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source
>>>>>>> project but I
>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good
>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would be
>>>>>>> eligible to
>>>>>>> > contribute.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Thanks!
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Jude
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Paul Irwin
>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
>>>>> feature[23]
>>>>>
>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
Please try to commit more often...
Thanks for putting an effort on this
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt the work I was doing in
> Spatial and started adding classes to
> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder to match what is in the
> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
>
> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added as well as a few other
> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
>
>
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
>
> Is it preferable to commit more often with fine grain, or is what I did
> fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from the lucene_solr_4_3
>> branch. located at
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
>>
>> I basically was attempting to
>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes that already exist,
>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the Spatial\BBox subdirectory) that
>> do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3 version that do not exist
>> in the .NET version yet.
>>
>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of this project. Is
>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not the correct thing to be
>> doing for this Spatial project?
>>
>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I do not mind moving to
>> something a little more simpler. If you have any recommendations, I would
>> appreciate it.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form of discussion
>>> required.
>>>
>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did there? The spatial module
>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest spatial4j (see spatial4n, which
>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the Spatial module there. There
>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think you picked quite a tough task
>>> as your first...
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>>>
>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jude,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use pull requests on
>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for something to go upstream, let me
>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it up. Eventually we can get
>>>> you commit access if you make enough progress to make it worthwhile. We
>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x work as I don't think it's
>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for issues.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project and made a lot of
>>>>> progress to get the number of build errors down. From my public repo where
>>>>> I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and then sent a Pull
>>>>> request through GitHub. If it does not show on your end, or I did not
>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to you, please let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the porting of the
>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on that until it is complete?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Jude
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <
>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jude -
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at porting 4.0
>>>>>> over (take a look at this page)
>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now it's
>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific feature).
>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick out a
>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature, and then create a pull
>>>>>> request.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations you
>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request comes in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature that
>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~P
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who is
>>>>>> currently
>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source
>>>>>> project but I
>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good
>>>>>> oppertunity to do
>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would be
>>>>>> eligible to
>>>>>> > contribute.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks!
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Jude
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Paul Irwin
>>>> Lead Software Engineer
>>>> feature[23]
>>>>
>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>.
In order to keep moving along, I decided to halt the work I was doing in
Spatial and started adding classes to
"\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder to match what is in the
"lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
Here is a commit with a lot of new classes added as well as a few other
changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
Is it preferable to commit more often with fine grain, or is what I did
fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
Thanks
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from the lucene_solr_4_3
> branch. located at
>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
>
> I basically was attempting to
> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes that already exist,
> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the Spatial\BBox subdirectory) that
> do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3 version that do not exist
> in the .NET version yet.
>
> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of this project. Is
> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not the correct thing to be
> doing for this Spatial project?
>
> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I do not mind moving to
> something a little more simpler. If you have any recommendations, I would
> appreciate it.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>wrote:
>
>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form of discussion required.
>>
>> Jude, can you please describe what you did there? The spatial module
>> needs to be brought in line with the latest spatial4j (see spatial4n, which
>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the Spatial module there. There
>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think you picked quite a tough task
>> as your first...
>>
>> --
>>
>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>>
>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Jude,
>>>
>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use pull requests on
>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for something to go upstream, let me
>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it up. Eventually we can get
>>> you commit access if you make enough progress to make it worthwhile. We
>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x work as I don't think it's
>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for issues.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project and made a lot of
>>>> progress to get the number of build errors down. From my public repo where
>>>> I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and then sent a Pull request
>>>> through GitHub. If it does not show on your end, or I did not follow the
>>>> correct steps to get changes to you, please let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the porting of the Spatial
>>>> project, and continue to work on that until it is complete?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Jude
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <
>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jude -
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at porting 4.0
>>>>> over (take a look at this page)
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now it's
>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific feature).
>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick out a
>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature, and then create a pull
>>>>> request.
>>>>>
>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations you make,
>>>>> just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request comes in.
>>>>>
>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature that Jude
>>>>> could work on for us?
>>>>>
>>>>> ~P
>>>>>
>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who is
>>>>> currently
>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source
>>>>> project but I
>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good
>>>>> oppertunity to do
>>>>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would be
>>>>> eligible to
>>>>> > contribute.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks!
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Jude
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Paul Irwin
>>> Lead Software Engineer
>>> feature[23]
>>>
>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
I'm pretty sure a lot of things changed within the existing classes as
well. Can you verify the code you have now for spatial, that it's indeed
in-line with the Java implementation?
The spatial4n project is probably up to date enough with 4.3. You will get
API incompatibilities (read: build errors) if not.
Once you've verified all code, and have ported all tests and they pass,
please open a JIRA ticket and I'll look at that.
I think porting major contribs like analysis is a good place for you to
start.
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from the lucene_solr_4_3
> branch. located at
>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
>
> I basically was attempting to
> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes that already exist,
> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the Spatial\BBox subdirectory) that
> do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3 version that do not exist
> in the .NET version yet.
>
> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of this project. Is
> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not the correct thing to be
> doing for this Spatial project?
>
> If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I do not mind moving to
> something a little more simpler. If you have any recommendations, I would
> appreciate it.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>wrote:
>
>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form of discussion required.
>>
>> Jude, can you please describe what you did there? The spatial module
>> needs to be brought in line with the latest spatial4j (see spatial4n, which
>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and the Spatial module there. There
>> have been a lot of API changes there. I think you picked quite a tough task
>> as your first...
>>
>> --
>>
>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>>
>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Jude,
>>>
>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use pull requests on
>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for something to go upstream, let me
>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it up. Eventually we can get
>>> you commit access if you make enough progress to make it worthwhile. We
>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x work as I don't think it's
>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for issues.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project and made a lot of
>>>> progress to get the number of build errors down. From my public repo where
>>>> I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and then sent a Pull request
>>>> through GitHub. If it does not show on your end, or I did not follow the
>>>> correct steps to get changes to you, please let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the porting of the Spatial
>>>> project, and continue to work on that until it is complete?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Jude
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <
>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jude -
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at porting 4.0
>>>>> over (take a look at this page)
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now it's
>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific feature).
>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick out a
>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature, and then create a pull
>>>>> request.
>>>>>
>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations you make,
>>>>> just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request comes in.
>>>>>
>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature that Jude
>>>>> could work on for us?
>>>>>
>>>>> ~P
>>>>>
>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who is
>>>>> currently
>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source
>>>>> project but I
>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good
>>>>> oppertunity to do
>>>>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would be
>>>>> eligible to
>>>>> > contribute.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks!
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Jude
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Paul Irwin
>>> Lead Software Engineer
>>> feature[23]
>>>
>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>.
Sure. I stated by looking at the Java version from the lucene_solr_4_3
branch. located at
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
I basically was attempting to
1) get rid of all the build errors in the classes that already exist,
2) remove the classes/files (such as the Spatial\BBox subdirectory) that do
not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
3) Add the new classes that are in the Java 4.3 version that do not exist
in the .NET version yet.
I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n component of this project. Is
mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3 branch not the correct thing to be
doing for this Spatial project?
If I did pick too hard of a task to start with, I do not mind moving to
something a little more simpler. If you have any recommendations, I would
appreciate it.
Thanks
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>wrote:
> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form of discussion required.
>
> Jude, can you please describe what you did there? The spatial module needs
> to be brought in line with the latest spatial4j (see spatial4n, which needs
> to be brought up to date as well) and the Spatial module there. There have
> been a lot of API changes there. I think you picked quite a tough task as
> your first...
>
> --
>
> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>
> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com> wrote:
>
>> Jude,
>>
>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use pull requests on
>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for something to go upstream, let me
>> know and I can pull from your fork and push it up. Eventually we can get
>> you commit access if you make enough progress to make it worthwhile. We
>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x work as I don't think it's
>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for issues.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project and made a lot of
>>> progress to get the number of build errors down. From my public repo where
>>> I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and then sent a Pull request
>>> through GitHub. If it does not show on your end, or I did not follow the
>>> correct steps to get changes to you, please let me know.
>>>
>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the porting of the Spatial
>>> project, and continue to work on that until it is complete?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jude
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jude -
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at porting 4.0
>>>> over (take a look at this page)
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
>>>>
>>>> I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now it's
>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific feature).
>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick out a
>>>> feature, create your ticket for that feature, and then create a pull
>>>> request.
>>>>
>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations you make,
>>>> just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request comes in.
>>>>
>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature that Jude
>>>> could work on for us?
>>>>
>>>> ~P
>>>>
>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
>>>> >
>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who is
>>>> currently
>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source project
>>>> but I
>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good oppertunity
>>>> to do
>>>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would be
>>>> eligible to
>>>> > contribute.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks!
>>>> >
>>>> > Jude
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Paul Irwin
>> Lead Software Engineer
>> feature[23]
>>
>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
>> Cell: 863-698-9294
>>
>
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
Let's work using JIRA, as there's always some form of discussion required.
Jude, can you please describe what you did there? The spatial module needs
to be brought in line with the latest spatial4j (see spatial4n, which needs
to be brought up to date as well) and the Spatial module there. There have
been a lot of API changes there. I think you picked quite a tough task as
your first...
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com> wrote:
> Jude,
>
> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use pull requests on GitHub
> currently. Once you're ready for something to go upstream, let me know and
> I can pull from your fork and push it up. Eventually we can get you commit
> access if you make enough progress to make it worthwhile. We haven't yet
> been using Jira for any of the 4.x work as I don't think it's quite to that
> stage of needing tickets for issues.
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project and made a lot of
>> progress to get the number of build errors down. From my public repo where
>> I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and then sent a Pull request
>> through GitHub. If it does not show on your end, or I did not follow the
>> correct steps to get changes to you, please let me know.
>>
>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the porting of the Spatial
>> project, and continue to work on that until it is complete?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jude
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Jude -
>>>
>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at porting 4.0
>>> over (take a look at this page)
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
>>>
>>> I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now it's pretty
>>> empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific feature). Using the
>>> page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick out a feature, create
>>> your ticket for that feature, and then create a pull request.
>>>
>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations you make,
>>> just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request comes in.
>>>
>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature that Jude
>>> could work on for us?
>>>
>>> ~P
>>>
>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
>>> >
>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who is
>>> currently
>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source project
>>> but I
>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good oppertunity
>>> to do
>>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would be
>>> eligible to
>>> > contribute.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks!
>>> >
>>> > Jude
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Paul Irwin
> Lead Software Engineer
> feature[23]
>
> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> Cell: 863-698-9294
>
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>.
Jude,
Thanks for getting going on this! No we do not use pull requests on GitHub
currently. Once you're ready for something to go upstream, let me know and
I can pull from your fork and push it up. Eventually we can get you commit
access if you make enough progress to make it worthwhile. We haven't yet
been using Jira for any of the 4.x work as I don't think it's quite to that
stage of needing tickets for issues.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project and made a lot of
> progress to get the number of build errors down. From my public repo where
> I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and then sent a Pull request
> through GitHub. If it does not show on your end, or I did not follow the
> correct steps to get changes to you, please let me know.
>
> Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the porting of the Spatial
> project, and continue to work on that until it is complete?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jude
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Jude -
>>
>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at porting 4.0 over
>> (take a look at this page)
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
>>
>> I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now it's pretty
>> empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific feature). Using the
>> page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick out a feature, create
>> your ticket for that feature, and then create a pull request.
>>
>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations you make,
>> just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request comes in.
>>
>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature that Jude
>> could work on for us?
>>
>> ~P
>>
>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
>> >
>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who is
>> currently
>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source project
>> but I
>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good oppertunity
>> to do
>> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would be
>> eligible to
>> > contribute.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > Jude
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
--
Paul Irwin
Lead Software Engineer
feature[23]
Email: pirwin@feature23.com
Cell: 863-698-9294
Re: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Jude Bowman <ju...@gmail.com>.
I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial project and made a lot of
progress to get the number of build errors down. From my public repo where
I cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed and then sent a Pull request
through GitHub. If it does not show on your end, or I did not follow the
correct steps to get changes to you, please let me know.
Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete the porting of the Spatial
project, and continue to work on that until it is complete?
Thanks,
Jude
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> Jude -
>
> Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at porting 4.0 over
> (take a look at this page)
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
>
> I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now it's pretty
> empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific feature). Using the
> page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick out a feature, create
> your ticket for that feature, and then create a pull request.
>
> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations you make,
> just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request comes in.
>
> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature that Jude
> could work on for us?
>
> ~P
>
> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> >
> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who is
> currently
> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source project
> but I
> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good oppertunity to
> do
> > so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would be eligible
> to
> > contribute.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Jude
> >
> >
>
RE: Lucene.net 4?
Posted by Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>.
Jude -
Thanks for offering to help, right now we are looking at porting 4.0 over (take a look at this page) https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
I believe the current process would be to check out our JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET - right now it's pretty empty, so you might create a ticket for your specific feature). Using the page above and possibly Paul and Itamar's help, pick out a feature, create your ticket for that feature, and then create a pull request.
We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any contribuations you make, just some paperwork. We can do that when a pull request comes in.
Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a specific feature that Jude could work on for us?
~P
> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
>
> I would love to contribute. I am a Sr. Software Engineer who is currently
> using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked on an open source project but I
> have been wanting to, so I am hoping this would be a good oppertunity to do
> so. Please contact me at jude_bowman@hotmail.com if I would be eligible to
> contribute.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jude
>
>