You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ws.apache.org by Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com> on 2015/06/28 17:02:23 UTC
Re: Is M10 release possible?
We need a new Woden release for Axis2 1.7.0 anyway, so there will be
one. I would like to simplify the release process for Woden, and I
have a patch in the pipeline to migrate the documentation from Forrest
to Maven.
Andreas
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry <re...@list.ru> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The current Woden snapshot has many fixes like:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-234
>
> On the other hand the Woden development looks stalled.
> Is there any chance to have some intermediate release like M10 with already
> incorporated fixes?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Dmitry
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Is M10 release possible?
Posted by Sagara Gunathunga <sa...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> OK. That regression is now fixed.
>
> @Sagara: to continue working on the release, I need JIRA admin rights
> for the WODEN project.
>
Granted, can you please check ?
Thanks !
>
> Andreas
>
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Andreas Veithen
> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Confirmed. There are indeed regressions:
> >
> > http://ws.apache.org/woden-staging/w3c-tests/results/Interchange.html
> >
> > Three of the test failures didn't occur with 1.0M9.
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Andreas Veithen
> > <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Andreas Veithen
> >> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Sagara Gunathunga
> >>> <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Veithen <
> andreas.veithen@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We need a new Woden release for Axis2 1.7.0 anyway, so there will be
> >>>>> one. I would like to simplify the release process for Woden, and I
> >>>>> have a patch in the pipeline to migrate the documentation from
> Forrest
> >>>>> to Maven.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> In fact I have started some preparation for Woden 1.0 release but had
> to on
> >>>> hold due to some other priorities I hope I can continue my works again
> >>>> middle of this week .
> >>>>
> >>>> BTW It seems Woden code base is still in JDK 1.4 level, it would be
> better
> >>>> if we can move into Java 5 or 6. But I doubt which one of followings
> is the
> >>>> best choice at this time.
> >>>>
> >>>> Option 1- As we are keep delaying Axis2 1.7, release Woden code
> with JDK
> >>>> 1.4 level support, down side of this option is we never know whether
> this
> >>>> could be the very last Woden release.
> >>>>
> >>>> Option 2- Move Woden code into Java 5( or 6) , down side of this
> approach
> >>>> is this will delay Axis2 1.7 release.
> >>>>
> >>>> I would like see others thoughts.
> >>>
> >>> I would go for option 1. We shouldn't delay the Axis2 1.7 release and
> >>> I don't see why there wouldn't be another Woden release, in particular
> >>> if we try simplifying the release process.
> >>>
> >>>> @Andreas, great to hear that you have patch to move documentation
> from
> >>>> Forrest to Maven something I really wanted to do but couldn't find
> enough
> >>>> time.
> >>>
> >>> I committed the patch. Note that I migrated the site _sources_. The
> >>> generated site apparently has some manual changes which would be lost
> >>> if we republish it now from the migrated sources (svn log
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/website/woden/). Some of
> >>> them were done by you, I guess because you were in the same situation
> >>> as everybody else here, namely not having any idea how this Forrest
> >>> thing works :-). If you get some time it would be great if you could
> >>> review these changes and if necessary reintegrate them into the
> >>> sources. I think that once this is done, it should be fairly easy to
> >>> make this project releasable using a straightforward release process
> >>> such as the one I use for Axiom.
> >>
> >> That statement was probably too optimistic. There is some more work
> >> required. I think we also have another problem, namely that the report
> >> produced by the W3C test suite suggests that there are regressions.
> >>
> >>>> Thanks !
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Andreas
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry <re...@list.ru> wrote:
> >>>>> > Hello,
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > The current Woden snapshot has many fixes like:
> >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-234
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On the other hand the Woden development looks stalled.
> >>>>> > Is there any chance to have some intermediate release like M10 with
> >>>>> > already
> >>>>> > incorporated fixes?
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Kind regards,
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Dmitry
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Sagara Gunathunga
> >>>>
> >>>> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
> >>>> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
> >>>> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
>
--
Sagara Gunathunga
Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
Re: Is M10 release possible?
Posted by Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>.
OK. That regression is now fixed.
@Sagara: to continue working on the release, I need JIRA admin rights
for the WODEN project.
Andreas
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Andreas Veithen
<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Confirmed. There are indeed regressions:
>
> http://ws.apache.org/woden-staging/w3c-tests/results/Interchange.html
>
> Three of the test failures didn't occur with 1.0M9.
>
> Andreas
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Andreas Veithen
> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Andreas Veithen
>> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Sagara Gunathunga
>>> <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We need a new Woden release for Axis2 1.7.0 anyway, so there will be
>>>>> one. I would like to simplify the release process for Woden, and I
>>>>> have a patch in the pipeline to migrate the documentation from Forrest
>>>>> to Maven.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In fact I have started some preparation for Woden 1.0 release but had to on
>>>> hold due to some other priorities I hope I can continue my works again
>>>> middle of this week .
>>>>
>>>> BTW It seems Woden code base is still in JDK 1.4 level, it would be better
>>>> if we can move into Java 5 or 6. But I doubt which one of followings is the
>>>> best choice at this time.
>>>>
>>>> Option 1- As we are keep delaying Axis2 1.7, release Woden code with JDK
>>>> 1.4 level support, down side of this option is we never know whether this
>>>> could be the very last Woden release.
>>>>
>>>> Option 2- Move Woden code into Java 5( or 6) , down side of this approach
>>>> is this will delay Axis2 1.7 release.
>>>>
>>>> I would like see others thoughts.
>>>
>>> I would go for option 1. We shouldn't delay the Axis2 1.7 release and
>>> I don't see why there wouldn't be another Woden release, in particular
>>> if we try simplifying the release process.
>>>
>>>> @Andreas, great to hear that you have patch to move documentation from
>>>> Forrest to Maven something I really wanted to do but couldn't find enough
>>>> time.
>>>
>>> I committed the patch. Note that I migrated the site _sources_. The
>>> generated site apparently has some manual changes which would be lost
>>> if we republish it now from the migrated sources (svn log
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/website/woden/). Some of
>>> them were done by you, I guess because you were in the same situation
>>> as everybody else here, namely not having any idea how this Forrest
>>> thing works :-). If you get some time it would be great if you could
>>> review these changes and if necessary reintegrate them into the
>>> sources. I think that once this is done, it should be fairly easy to
>>> make this project releasable using a straightforward release process
>>> such as the one I use for Axiom.
>>
>> That statement was probably too optimistic. There is some more work
>> required. I think we also have another problem, namely that the report
>> produced by the W3C test suite suggests that there are regressions.
>>
>>>> Thanks !
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry <re...@list.ru> wrote:
>>>>> > Hello,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The current Woden snapshot has many fixes like:
>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-234
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On the other hand the Woden development looks stalled.
>>>>> > Is there any chance to have some intermediate release like M10 with
>>>>> > already
>>>>> > incorporated fixes?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Kind regards,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Dmitry
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sagara Gunathunga
>>>>
>>>> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
>>>> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
>>>> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Is M10 release possible?
Posted by Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>.
Confirmed. There are indeed regressions:
http://ws.apache.org/woden-staging/w3c-tests/results/Interchange.html
Three of the test failures didn't occur with 1.0M9.
Andreas
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Andreas Veithen
<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Andreas Veithen
> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Sagara Gunathunga
>> <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We need a new Woden release for Axis2 1.7.0 anyway, so there will be
>>>> one. I would like to simplify the release process for Woden, and I
>>>> have a patch in the pipeline to migrate the documentation from Forrest
>>>> to Maven.
>>>
>>>
>>> In fact I have started some preparation for Woden 1.0 release but had to on
>>> hold due to some other priorities I hope I can continue my works again
>>> middle of this week .
>>>
>>> BTW It seems Woden code base is still in JDK 1.4 level, it would be better
>>> if we can move into Java 5 or 6. But I doubt which one of followings is the
>>> best choice at this time.
>>>
>>> Option 1- As we are keep delaying Axis2 1.7, release Woden code with JDK
>>> 1.4 level support, down side of this option is we never know whether this
>>> could be the very last Woden release.
>>>
>>> Option 2- Move Woden code into Java 5( or 6) , down side of this approach
>>> is this will delay Axis2 1.7 release.
>>>
>>> I would like see others thoughts.
>>
>> I would go for option 1. We shouldn't delay the Axis2 1.7 release and
>> I don't see why there wouldn't be another Woden release, in particular
>> if we try simplifying the release process.
>>
>>> @Andreas, great to hear that you have patch to move documentation from
>>> Forrest to Maven something I really wanted to do but couldn't find enough
>>> time.
>>
>> I committed the patch. Note that I migrated the site _sources_. The
>> generated site apparently has some manual changes which would be lost
>> if we republish it now from the migrated sources (svn log
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/website/woden/). Some of
>> them were done by you, I guess because you were in the same situation
>> as everybody else here, namely not having any idea how this Forrest
>> thing works :-). If you get some time it would be great if you could
>> review these changes and if necessary reintegrate them into the
>> sources. I think that once this is done, it should be fairly easy to
>> make this project releasable using a straightforward release process
>> such as the one I use for Axiom.
>
> That statement was probably too optimistic. There is some more work
> required. I think we also have another problem, namely that the report
> produced by the W3C test suite suggests that there are regressions.
>
>>> Thanks !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry <re...@list.ru> wrote:
>>>> > Hello,
>>>> >
>>>> > The current Woden snapshot has many fixes like:
>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-234
>>>> >
>>>> > On the other hand the Woden development looks stalled.
>>>> > Is there any chance to have some intermediate release like M10 with
>>>> > already
>>>> > incorporated fixes?
>>>> >
>>>> > Kind regards,
>>>> >
>>>> > Dmitry
>>>> >
>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sagara Gunathunga
>>>
>>> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
>>> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
>>> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Is M10 release possible?
Posted by Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Andreas Veithen
<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Sagara Gunathunga
> <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> We need a new Woden release for Axis2 1.7.0 anyway, so there will be
>>> one. I would like to simplify the release process for Woden, and I
>>> have a patch in the pipeline to migrate the documentation from Forrest
>>> to Maven.
>>
>>
>> In fact I have started some preparation for Woden 1.0 release but had to on
>> hold due to some other priorities I hope I can continue my works again
>> middle of this week .
>>
>> BTW It seems Woden code base is still in JDK 1.4 level, it would be better
>> if we can move into Java 5 or 6. But I doubt which one of followings is the
>> best choice at this time.
>>
>> Option 1- As we are keep delaying Axis2 1.7, release Woden code with JDK
>> 1.4 level support, down side of this option is we never know whether this
>> could be the very last Woden release.
>>
>> Option 2- Move Woden code into Java 5( or 6) , down side of this approach
>> is this will delay Axis2 1.7 release.
>>
>> I would like see others thoughts.
>
> I would go for option 1. We shouldn't delay the Axis2 1.7 release and
> I don't see why there wouldn't be another Woden release, in particular
> if we try simplifying the release process.
>
>> @Andreas, great to hear that you have patch to move documentation from
>> Forrest to Maven something I really wanted to do but couldn't find enough
>> time.
>
> I committed the patch. Note that I migrated the site _sources_. The
> generated site apparently has some manual changes which would be lost
> if we republish it now from the migrated sources (svn log
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/website/woden/). Some of
> them were done by you, I guess because you were in the same situation
> as everybody else here, namely not having any idea how this Forrest
> thing works :-). If you get some time it would be great if you could
> review these changes and if necessary reintegrate them into the
> sources. I think that once this is done, it should be fairly easy to
> make this project releasable using a straightforward release process
> such as the one I use for Axiom.
That statement was probably too optimistic. There is some more work
required. I think we also have another problem, namely that the report
produced by the W3C test suite suggests that there are regressions.
>> Thanks !
>>>
>>>
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry <re...@list.ru> wrote:
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> > The current Woden snapshot has many fixes like:
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-234
>>> >
>>> > On the other hand the Woden development looks stalled.
>>> > Is there any chance to have some intermediate release like M10 with
>>> > already
>>> > incorporated fixes?
>>> >
>>> > Kind regards,
>>> >
>>> > Dmitry
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sagara Gunathunga
>>
>> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
>> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
>> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Is M10 release possible?
Posted by Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Sagara Gunathunga
<sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> We need a new Woden release for Axis2 1.7.0 anyway, so there will be
>> one. I would like to simplify the release process for Woden, and I
>> have a patch in the pipeline to migrate the documentation from Forrest
>> to Maven.
>
>
> In fact I have started some preparation for Woden 1.0 release but had to on
> hold due to some other priorities I hope I can continue my works again
> middle of this week .
>
> BTW It seems Woden code base is still in JDK 1.4 level, it would be better
> if we can move into Java 5 or 6. But I doubt which one of followings is the
> best choice at this time.
>
> Option 1- As we are keep delaying Axis2 1.7, release Woden code with JDK
> 1.4 level support, down side of this option is we never know whether this
> could be the very last Woden release.
>
> Option 2- Move Woden code into Java 5( or 6) , down side of this approach
> is this will delay Axis2 1.7 release.
>
> I would like see others thoughts.
I would go for option 1. We shouldn't delay the Axis2 1.7 release and
I don't see why there wouldn't be another Woden release, in particular
if we try simplifying the release process.
> @Andreas, great to hear that you have patch to move documentation from
> Forrest to Maven something I really wanted to do but couldn't find enough
> time.
I committed the patch. Note that I migrated the site _sources_. The
generated site apparently has some manual changes which would be lost
if we republish it now from the migrated sources (svn log
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/website/woden/). Some of
them were done by you, I guess because you were in the same situation
as everybody else here, namely not having any idea how this Forrest
thing works :-). If you get some time it would be great if you could
review these changes and if necessary reintegrate them into the
sources. I think that once this is done, it should be fairly easy to
make this project releasable using a straightforward release process
such as the one I use for Axiom.
> Thanks !
>>
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry <re...@list.ru> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > The current Woden snapshot has many fixes like:
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-234
>> >
>> > On the other hand the Woden development looks stalled.
>> > Is there any chance to have some intermediate release like M10 with
>> > already
>> > incorporated fixes?
>> >
>> > Kind regards,
>> >
>> > Dmitry
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sagara Gunathunga
>
> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Is M10 release possible?
Posted by Sagara Gunathunga <sa...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> We need a new Woden release for Axis2 1.7.0 anyway, so there will be
> one. I would like to simplify the release process for Woden, and I
> have a patch in the pipeline to migrate the documentation from Forrest
> to Maven.
>
In fact I have started some preparation for Woden 1.0 release but had to on
hold due to some other priorities I hope I can continue my works again
middle of this week .
BTW It seems Woden code base is still in JDK 1.4 level, it would be better
if we can move into Java 5 or 6. But I doubt which one of followings is the
best choice at this time.
Option 1- As we are keep delaying Axis2 1.7, release Woden code with JDK
1.4 level support, down side of this option is we never know whether this
could be the very last Woden release.
Option 2- Move Woden code into Java 5( or 6) , down side of this approach
is this will delay Axis2 1.7 release.
I would like see others thoughts.
@Andreas, great to hear that you have patch to move documentation from
Forrest to Maven something I really wanted to do but couldn't find enough
time.
Thanks !
>
> Andreas
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry <re...@list.ru> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The current Woden snapshot has many fixes like:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-234
> >
> > On the other hand the Woden development looks stalled.
> > Is there any chance to have some intermediate release like M10 with
> already
> > incorporated fixes?
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Dmitry
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
--
Sagara Gunathunga
Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara