You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@tiles.apache.org by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com> on 2009/04/02 19:53:03 UTC
Re: [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (TILES-387) Creating a
tilesConfigurer for Spring Web does not work in an OSGi environment
You can see some sample code in the Tiles test webapp:
http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/tiles/framework/trunk/tiles-test/
See also:
http://tiles.apache.org/framework/tutorial/configuration.html#Startup_with_Java_code
Pure Java configuration does not use reflection to instantiate
objects, you need to create them yourself extending basic elements.
(e.g BasicTilesContainerFactory, TilesListener).
2009/4/2 Bjorn Harvold (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>:
>
> [ https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/TILES-387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=45822#action_45822 ]
>
> Bjorn Harvold edited comment on TILES-387 at 4/1/09 10:44 PM:
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I looked at the documentation for a pure Java configuration. I am not quite sure what to do in this case. Is there sample code for this? Regardless of which way we initialize Tiles, if there is a class loader in one bundle that tries to instantiate a class from another bundle and the former bundle doesn't have the latter bundle as part of its osgi imports, it won't work. I am going to fiddle around with the pure configuration in the mean time. If you have some sample code, that would be great.. or should I just extend the BasicTilesContainerFactory or the ServletTilesApplicationContextFactory?
>
> E.g.
> protected TilesContainer createTilesContainer() throws TilesException {
> ServletContextAdapter adaptedContext = new ServletContextAdapter(new DelegatingServletConfig());
> TilesApplicationContext preliminaryContext = new ServletTilesApplicationContext(adaptedContext);
> AbstractTilesApplicationContextFactory contextFactory = MyServletTilesApplicationContextFactory.createFactory(preliminaryContext);
> this.tilesContext = contextFactory.createApplicationContext(adaptedContext);
> AbstractTilesContainerFactory factory = MyBasicTilesContainerFactory.getTilesContainerFactory(this.tilesContext);
>
> return factory.createContainer(this.tilesContext);
> }
>
> where both of my classes do nothing but extend. This will of course throw the same classnotfoundexception. Also if you just specify those classes in web.xml.
>
> was (Author: bjornharvold):
> I looked at the documentation for a pure Java configuration. I am not quite sure what to do in this case. Is there sample code for this? Regardless of which way we initialize Tiles, if there is a class loader in one bundle that tries to instantiate a class from another bundle and the former bundle doesn't have the latter bundle as part of its osgi imports, it won't work. I am going to fiddle around with the pure configuration in the mean time. If you have some sample code, that would be great.. or should I just extend the BasicTilesContainerFactory or the ServletTilesApplicationContextFactory?
>
>> Creating a tilesConfigurer for Spring Web does not work in an OSGi environment
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Key: TILES-387
>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/TILES-387
>> Project: Tiles
>> Issue Type: Bug
>> Components: tiles-api, tiles-servlet
>> Affects Versions: 2.1.2
>> Environment: Any
>> Reporter: Bjorn Harvold
>>
>> As of Tiles 2.1.1, the TilesConfigurer that was written by the Spring guys no longer works as they are using deprecated attributes in Tiles. They are working on a new tiles configurer for v3 of Spring. In the meantime, there have been some solutions submitted by the community. They work in a regular environment but not within an OSGi environment.
>> (see here for details on the issue raised: http://jira.springframework.org/browse/SPR-5411)
>> The problem is this:
>> public SpringTilesConfigurer() {
>> this.tilesPropertyMap.put(
>> AbstractTilesApplicationContextFactory.APPLICATION_CONTEXT_FACTORY_INIT_PARAM,
>> WildcardServletTilesApplicationContextFactory.class.getName());
>> this.tilesPropertyMap.put(
>> TilesContainerFactory.PREPARER_FACTORY_INIT_PARAM,
>> BasicPreparerFactory.class.getName());
>> this.tilesPropertyMap.put(
>> DefinitionsFactory.LOCALE_RESOLVER_IMPL_PROPERTY,
>> SpringLocaleResolver.class.getName());
>> this.tilesPropertyMap.put(TilesContainerFactory.ATTRIBUTE_EVALUATOR_INIT_PARAM, ELAttributeEvaluator.class.getName());
>> this.tilesPropertyMap.put(TilesContainerFactory.CONTAINER_FACTORY_MUTABLE_INIT_PARAM,
>> Boolean.toString(false));
>> }
>> protected TilesContainer createTilesContainer() throws TilesException {
>> ServletContextAdapter adaptedContext = new ServletContextAdapter(new DelegatingServletConfig());
>> TilesApplicationContext preliminaryContext = new ServletTilesApplicationContext(adaptedContext);
>> AbstractTilesApplicationContextFactory contextFactory = AbstractTilesApplicationContextFactory.createFactory(preliminaryContext);
>> this.tilesContext = contextFactory.createApplicationContext(adaptedContext);
>> AbstractTilesContainerFactory factory = AbstractTilesContainerFactory.getTilesContainerFactory(this.tilesContext);
>> return factory.createContainer(this.tilesContext);
>> }
>> When trying to create the context factory, it will try to initialize WildcardServletTilesApplicationContextFactory in AbstractTilesApplicationContextFactory:80 with the help of ClassUtil. Now WildcardServletTilesApplicationContextFactory is located in the tiles-servlet bundle while ClassUtil is located in tiles-api. Tiles-api does not have an import dependency on tiles-servlet (as it should be) so when ClassUtil tries to instantiate the class it cannot find it. This problem also occurs when trying to instantiate the TilesContainerFactory.
>> Is there something the Tiles team needs to do in order to make this a work within OSGi or is the Spring community going at it the wrong way?
>> Cheers
>> bjorn
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>