You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spark.apache.org by Kevin Markey <ke...@oracle.com> on 2014/04/01 01:33:52 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.1 (RC3)
I had specifically requested that the ASM shading be included in the RC,
hence my testing focused on that, but I ran other tests as well. Tested
with a build of our project, running one of our applications from that
build in yarn-standalone on a pseudocluster, and successfully
redeploying and bringing up a web app that is integrated with Spark. It
is the latter where most ASM conflicts have typically occurred.
Successful build and passed both tests. So, my vote:
+1
One test which I'd like to run but can't because of unrelated library
conflicts would have been to remove various ASM exclusions from other
libraries, recompiling and redeploying. But I'd incur the wrath of the
rest of my team doing that, especially after a full day of tracking down
yet another (totally unrelated) library conflict.
Thanks for this maintenance release.
Kevin Markey
On 03/31/2014 12:32 PM, Tathagata Das wrote:
> Yes, lets extend the vote for two more days from now. So the vote is open
> till *Wednesday, April 02, at 20:00 UTC*
>
> On that note, my +1
>
> TD
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Patrick Wendell <pw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yeah good point. Let's just extend this vote another few days?
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Tom Graves <tg...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I should probably pull this off into another thread, but going forward
>> can
>>> we try to not have the release votes end on a weekend? Since we only seem
>>> to give 3 days, it makes it really hard for anyone who is offline for the
>>> weekend to try it out. Either that or extend the voting for more then 3
>>> days.
>>>
>>> Tom
>>> On Monday, March 31, 2014 12:50 AM, Patrick Wendell <pw...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> TD - I downloaded and did some local testing. Looks good to me!
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> You should cast your own vote - at that point it's enough to pass.
>>>
>>> - Patrick
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:47 PM, prabeesh k <pr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>> tested on Ubuntu12.04 64bit
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Matei Zaharia <
>> matei.zaharia@gmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> +1 tested on Mac OS X.
>>>>>
>>>>> Matei
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 27, 2014, at 1:32 AM, Tathagata Das <
>>> tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
>>>> version
>>>>> 0.9.1
>>>>>> A draft of the release notes along with the CHANGES.txt file is
>>>>>> attached to this e-mail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The tag to be voted on is v0.9.1-rc3 (commit 4c43182b):
>>>>>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=spark.git;a=commit;h=4c43182b6d1b0b7717423f386c0214fe93073208
>>>>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
>>> at:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~tdas/spark-0.9.1-rc3/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/tdas.asc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1009/
>>>>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~tdas/spark-0.9.1-rc3-docs/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Spark 0.9.1!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote is open until Sunday, March 30, at 10:00 UTC and passes if
>>>>>> a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 0.9.1
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see
>>>>>> http://spark.apache.org/
>>>>>> <CHANGES.txt><RELEASE_NOTES.txt>
>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.1 (RC3)
Posted by Andrew Or <an...@databricks.com>.
+1 tested on OSX
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Kevin Markey <ke...@oracle.com>wrote:
> I had specifically requested that the ASM shading be included in the RC,
> hence my testing focused on that, but I ran other tests as well. Tested
> with a build of our project, running one of our applications from that
> build in yarn-standalone on a pseudocluster, and successfully redeploying
> and bringing up a web app that is integrated with Spark. It is the latter
> where most ASM conflicts have typically occurred. Successful build and
> passed both tests. So, my vote:
>
> +1
>
> One test which I'd like to run but can't because of unrelated library
> conflicts would have been to remove various ASM exclusions from other
> libraries, recompiling and redeploying. But I'd incur the wrath of the
> rest of my team doing that, especially after a full day of tracking down
> yet another (totally unrelated) library conflict.
>
> Thanks for this maintenance release.
>
> Kevin Markey
>
>
>
> On 03/31/2014 12:32 PM, Tathagata Das wrote:
>
>> Yes, lets extend the vote for two more days from now. So the vote is open
>> till *Wednesday, April 02, at 20:00 UTC*
>>
>> On that note, my +1
>>
>> TD
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Patrick Wendell <pw...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah good point. Let's just extend this vote another few days?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Tom Graves <tg...@yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I should probably pull this off into another thread, but going forward
>>>>
>>> can
>>>
>>>> we try to not have the release votes end on a weekend? Since we only
>>>> seem
>>>> to give 3 days, it makes it really hard for anyone who is offline for
>>>> the
>>>> weekend to try it out. Either that or extend the voting for more then
>>>> 3
>>>> days.
>>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>> On Monday, March 31, 2014 12:50 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwendell@gmail.com
>>>> >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> TD - I downloaded and did some local testing. Looks good to me!
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> You should cast your own vote - at that point it's enough to pass.
>>>>
>>>> - Patrick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:47 PM, prabeesh k <pr...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>> tested on Ubuntu12.04 64bit
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Matei Zaharia <
>>>>>
>>>> matei.zaharia@gmail.com
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> +1 tested on Mac OS X.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matei
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 27, 2014, at 1:32 AM, Tathagata Das <
>>>>>>
>>>>> tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> version
>>>>>
>>>>>> 0.9.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A draft of the release notes along with the CHANGES.txt file is
>>>>>>> attached to this e-mail.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The tag to be voted on is v0.9.1-rc3 (commit 4c43182b):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=spark.git;a=commit;h=
>>> 4c43182b6d1b0b7717423f386c0214fe93073208
>>>
>>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> at:
>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~tdas/spark-0.9.1-rc3/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/tdas.asc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>> orgapachespark-1009/
>>>
>>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~tdas/spark-0.9.1-rc3-docs/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Spark 0.9.1!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vote is open until Sunday, March 30, at 10:00 UTC and passes if
>>>>>>> a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 0.9.1
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see
>>>>>>> http://spark.apache.org/
>>>>>>> <CHANGES.txt><RELEASE_NOTES.txt>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>