You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@royale.apache.org by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> on 2019/03/04 09:26:02 UTC
Apache Royale on Stackoverflow
Hi,
I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on Stackoverflow.
Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing presence over
time should be a key goal for us.
What do you think?
Thanks
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow
Posted by Olaf Krueger <ma...@olafkrueger.net>.
+1 for apacheroyale
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/
Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
More about good vs bad questions here [1]
[1] https://stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask
El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 19:50, Carlos Rovira (<ca...@apache.org>)
escribió:
> Hi Josh,
>
> thanks for pointing about how to do answers. As I signed in SO site, I saw
> some indications about be very explicit and avoid questions that could be
> "interpreted", So questions like you proposed seems perfect.
>
> About availability for all people here: IMHO we should all try to setup
> and account there and help as we can. That doesn't mean necessarily to move
> from this list to SO. Just to be aware and in the same way we help here,
> try to help there. And if any of you here spend 20' here spend only that
> time (and only that) here or there. I think we all here want Royale to
> succeed. I think this is a key point since people is in SO, and I'm sure
> this is an opportunity to make Apache Royale better known to people that in
> other circumstances could never know about it.
>
> As all vote for "apacheroyale", it's ok for me too.
>
> Thanks! :)
>
>
> El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 18:54, Alex Harui (<ah...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> escribió:
>
>> Those who want to help create a presence for Royale on SO are certainly
>> welcome and have my thanks for doing so.
>>
>> I think an "apacheroyale" tag is best.
>>
>> I would not recommend making SO our main user support channel at this
>> time. Some ASF projects do, but we already have users@ and also I think
>> myself and others are unable to help on SO. I've had trouble getting
>> established on SO in the past. In fact, I just tried logging in there
>> again and I think they erased my account so I had to sign up again.
>>
>> I'll keep trying if I have a few moments here and there, but for now I'll
>> mainly help on the mailing lists.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 3/4/19, 8:42 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Another one:
>>
>> Question: Why isn't JSON working in my Royale app?
>> Answer: Either use variable["property"] syntax or enable the
>> -js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true compiler option.
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>> On 2019/03/04 16:41:03, Josh Tynjala <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Recently, I edited an answer to an old question about AS3 IDEs
>> recently (to add VSCode and Moonshine), and the original question (which
>> had been up for years) was almost instantly closed by moderators.
>> StackOverflow has become very strict about open-ended questions that are
>> more appropriate to discussion forums. Choose your questions wisely.
>> >
>> > More specific questions that can be solved with a small code
>> example are probably the best choice.
>> >
>> > Look for issues that come up frequently. For instance, there are
>> often problems if someone forgets to add a data binding bead to a
>> component. In the question, you'll want a component that is broken because
>> it's missing the bead. In the answer, show them which bead to add and where
>> it should be added.
>> >
>> > In fact, more questions involving beads are probably great
>> candidates!
>> >
>> > Question: How do I use some feature in component X.
>> > Answer: This feature isn't enabled by default, but you can add Y
>> bead to the component.
>> >
>> > - Josh
>> >
>> > On 2019/03/04 13:14:09, Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > "apacheroyale" is fine with me.
>> > >
>> > > SO's tutorial suggests that open-ended discussion-type questions
>> fare worse
>> > > on the site than specific, solution-focused questions. I wonder
>> if it would
>> > > be considered spam to "recreate" some of the conversations on
>> tricky
>> > > Flex-to-Royale issues that we have already talked through in this
>> channel.
>> > > Feels a bit like reality-show tv to me... An alternative would be
>> to post
>> > > some of the current, not-yet-resolved questions. We might even
>> attract
>> > > interesting response from outside the existing Royale community.
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:57 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I'm opt for "apacheroyale" - I'm using it for almost all posts
>> on
>> > > > Moonshine's IDE twitter and fb, so it could be somehow
>> consistent. ;)
>> > > >
>> > > > pon., 4 mar 2019 o 13:23 Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>
>> napisał(a):
>> > > >
>> > > > > Carlos and I were pondering possible tags for such an
>> adventure. Options
>> > > > > seem to include "apacheroyale", "apache-royale", or just
>> plain "royale".
>> > > > It
>> > > > > is telling that none of these tags currently exist.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I am happy to lob softball questions to get conversations
>> started, maybe:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > - What's the best migration path away from Flash for an
>> enterprise-level
>> > > > > Flex app?
>> > > > > - What are the options for IDEs for developing in JS? [I note
>> that
>> > > > > "moonshine" is not a recognized tag on SO at the moment]
>> > > > > - How can I reuse my AS3 and MXML code if Flash is not an
>> option?
>> > > > > Other leading questions?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I am happy to be the naive question-asker, but of course
>> getting juice
>> > > > into
>> > > > > these conversations (and maybe drawing conversation-browsers
>> toward
>> > > > Royale)
>> > > > > depends on those who have already found Royale providing
>> answers.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > a
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Carlos Rovira <
>> carlosrovira@apache.org>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I as you used Stackoverflow just for consulting. Just
>> create my account
>> > > > > > now, so I'm learning too.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > What does mean for Apache Royale? Nowadays, a way to
>> measure tech
>> > > > impact
>> > > > > > and how others could choose to go with Royale is see how
>> easy is to
>> > > > find
>> > > > > > answers to questions. So you know, we want to know how
>> something is
>> > > > done
>> > > > > > and people instead to go to normal docs, he google it, and
>> normally for
>> > > > > > development problems stack overflow use to have responses.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > So, how we could "start"? I think we'll need to enter some
>> common
>> > > > > > questions and maybe respond ourselves ? I really don't
>> know, but there
>> > > > > > should be some way to start and have a "apacheroyale" tag
>> for all the
>> > > > > > question related to us.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > For example, I think Andrew could be a good active to
>> starting this if
>> > > > he
>> > > > > > thing is interesting, both investigating the way to do it
>> and starting
>> > > > > some
>> > > > > > questions so we can answer and easing the rest of us
>> entering SO
>> > > > world..
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 10:42, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> > > > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do
>> you mean ?
>> > > > I'm
>> > > > > >> rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does
>> presence of Royale
>> > > > > can
>> > > > > >> be printed there ?
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
>> napisał(a):
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> > Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have
>> time to
>> > > > answer
>> > > > > >> SO
>> > > > > >> > questions.
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > Harbs
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira <
>> > > > carlosrovira@apache.org
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> > wrote:
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > Hi,
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on
>> > > > > Stackoverflow.
>> > > > > >> > > Starting to have questions and answers there and
>> increasing
>> > > > presence
>> > > > > >> over
>> > > > > >> > > time should be a key goal for us.
>> > > > > >> > > What do you think?
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > Thanks
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > --
>> > > > > >> > > Carlos Rovira
>> > > > > >> > >
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=1iU6%2FVaeWueZID2a9d%2BFBRhOsH6sD9Ko60XZhyuBlB8%3D&reserved=0
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> --
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Piotr Zarzycki
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Patreon: *
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=kcGeJoth0t22Q6CbKEyjfjWf6St1ZkkWyRCMJraHA5Q%3D&reserved=0
>> > > > > >> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=kcGeJoth0t22Q6CbKEyjfjWf6St1ZkkWyRCMJraHA5Q%3D&reserved=0
>> >*
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > Carlos Rovira
>> > > > > >
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=1iU6%2FVaeWueZID2a9d%2BFBRhOsH6sD9Ko60XZhyuBlB8%3D&reserved=0
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Andrew Wetmore
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=yKLxv%2FAi42MPuXgA%2F1mL1e9PVKhDwdANKt1Uy0cMK74%3D&reserved=0
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > >
>> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
>> > > >
>> > > > Patreon: *
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=kcGeJoth0t22Q6CbKEyjfjWf6St1ZkkWyRCMJraHA5Q%3D&reserved=0
>> > > > <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=kcGeJoth0t22Q6CbKEyjfjWf6St1ZkkWyRCMJraHA5Q%3D&reserved=0
>> >*
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Andrew Wetmore
>> > >
>> > >
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=yKLxv%2FAi42MPuXgA%2F1mL1e9PVKhDwdANKt1Uy0cMK74%3D&reserved=0
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi Josh,
thanks for pointing about how to do answers. As I signed in SO site, I saw
some indications about be very explicit and avoid questions that could be
"interpreted", So questions like you proposed seems perfect.
About availability for all people here: IMHO we should all try to setup and
account there and help as we can. That doesn't mean necessarily to move
from this list to SO. Just to be aware and in the same way we help here,
try to help there. And if any of you here spend 20' here spend only that
time (and only that) here or there. I think we all here want Royale to
succeed. I think this is a key point since people is in SO, and I'm sure
this is an opportunity to make Apache Royale better known to people that in
other circumstances could never know about it.
As all vote for "apacheroyale", it's ok for me too.
Thanks! :)
El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 18:54, Alex Harui (<ah...@adobe.com.invalid>)
escribió:
> Those who want to help create a presence for Royale on SO are certainly
> welcome and have my thanks for doing so.
>
> I think an "apacheroyale" tag is best.
>
> I would not recommend making SO our main user support channel at this
> time. Some ASF projects do, but we already have users@ and also I think
> myself and others are unable to help on SO. I've had trouble getting
> established on SO in the past. In fact, I just tried logging in there
> again and I think they erased my account so I had to sign up again.
>
> I'll keep trying if I have a few moments here and there, but for now I'll
> mainly help on the mailing lists.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 3/4/19, 8:42 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Another one:
>
> Question: Why isn't JSON working in my Royale app?
> Answer: Either use variable["property"] syntax or enable the
> -js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true compiler option.
>
> - Josh
>
> On 2019/03/04 16:41:03, Josh Tynjala <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Recently, I edited an answer to an old question about AS3 IDEs
> recently (to add VSCode and Moonshine), and the original question (which
> had been up for years) was almost instantly closed by moderators.
> StackOverflow has become very strict about open-ended questions that are
> more appropriate to discussion forums. Choose your questions wisely.
> >
> > More specific questions that can be solved with a small code example
> are probably the best choice.
> >
> > Look for issues that come up frequently. For instance, there are
> often problems if someone forgets to add a data binding bead to a
> component. In the question, you'll want a component that is broken because
> it's missing the bead. In the answer, show them which bead to add and where
> it should be added.
> >
> > In fact, more questions involving beads are probably great
> candidates!
> >
> > Question: How do I use some feature in component X.
> > Answer: This feature isn't enabled by default, but you can add Y
> bead to the component.
> >
> > - Josh
> >
> > On 2019/03/04 13:14:09, Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > "apacheroyale" is fine with me.
> > >
> > > SO's tutorial suggests that open-ended discussion-type questions
> fare worse
> > > on the site than specific, solution-focused questions. I wonder if
> it would
> > > be considered spam to "recreate" some of the conversations on
> tricky
> > > Flex-to-Royale issues that we have already talked through in this
> channel.
> > > Feels a bit like reality-show tv to me... An alternative would be
> to post
> > > some of the current, not-yet-resolved questions. We might even
> attract
> > > interesting response from outside the existing Royale community.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:57 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm opt for "apacheroyale" - I'm using it for almost all posts on
> > > > Moonshine's IDE twitter and fb, so it could be somehow
> consistent. ;)
> > > >
> > > > pon., 4 mar 2019 o 13:23 Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
> > > >
> > > > > Carlos and I were pondering possible tags for such an
> adventure. Options
> > > > > seem to include "apacheroyale", "apache-royale", or just plain
> "royale".
> > > > It
> > > > > is telling that none of these tags currently exist.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am happy to lob softball questions to get conversations
> started, maybe:
> > > > >
> > > > > - What's the best migration path away from Flash for an
> enterprise-level
> > > > > Flex app?
> > > > > - What are the options for IDEs for developing in JS? [I note
> that
> > > > > "moonshine" is not a recognized tag on SO at the moment]
> > > > > - How can I reuse my AS3 and MXML code if Flash is not an
> option?
> > > > > Other leading questions?
> > > > >
> > > > > I am happy to be the naive question-asker, but of course
> getting juice
> > > > into
> > > > > these conversations (and maybe drawing conversation-browsers
> toward
> > > > Royale)
> > > > > depends on those who have already found Royale providing
> answers.
> > > > >
> > > > > a
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I as you used Stackoverflow just for consulting. Just create
> my account
> > > > > > now, so I'm learning too.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What does mean for Apache Royale? Nowadays, a way to measure
> tech
> > > > impact
> > > > > > and how others could choose to go with Royale is see how
> easy is to
> > > > find
> > > > > > answers to questions. So you know, we want to know how
> something is
> > > > done
> > > > > > and people instead to go to normal docs, he google it, and
> normally for
> > > > > > development problems stack overflow use to have responses.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, how we could "start"? I think we'll need to enter some
> common
> > > > > > questions and maybe respond ourselves ? I really don't know,
> but there
> > > > > > should be some way to start and have a "apacheroyale" tag
> for all the
> > > > > > question related to us.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For example, I think Andrew could be a good active to
> starting this if
> > > > he
> > > > > > thing is interesting, both investigating the way to do it
> and starting
> > > > > some
> > > > > > questions so we can answer and easing the rest of us
> entering SO
> > > > world..
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 10:42, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do
> you mean ?
> > > > I'm
> > > > > >> rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does presence
> of Royale
> > > > > can
> > > > > >> be printed there ?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have
> time to
> > > > answer
> > > > > >> SO
> > > > > >> > questions.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Harbs
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> > > > carlosrovira@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Hi,
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on
> > > > > Stackoverflow.
> > > > > >> > > Starting to have questions and answers there and
> increasing
> > > > presence
> > > > > >> over
> > > > > >> > > time should be a key goal for us.
> > > > > >> > > What do you think?
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Thanks
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > --
> > > > > >> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > >> > >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=1iU6%2FVaeWueZID2a9d%2BFBRhOsH6sD9Ko60XZhyuBlB8%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Patreon: *
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=kcGeJoth0t22Q6CbKEyjfjWf6St1ZkkWyRCMJraHA5Q%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > >> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=kcGeJoth0t22Q6CbKEyjfjWf6St1ZkkWyRCMJraHA5Q%3D&reserved=0
> >*
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=1iU6%2FVaeWueZID2a9d%2BFBRhOsH6sD9Ko60XZhyuBlB8%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Andrew Wetmore
> > > > >
> > > > >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=yKLxv%2FAi42MPuXgA%2F1mL1e9PVKhDwdANKt1Uy0cMK74%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >
> > > > Patreon: *
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=kcGeJoth0t22Q6CbKEyjfjWf6St1ZkkWyRCMJraHA5Q%3D&reserved=0
> > > > <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=kcGeJoth0t22Q6CbKEyjfjWf6St1ZkkWyRCMJraHA5Q%3D&reserved=0
> >*
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Wetmore
> > >
> > >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=yKLxv%2FAi42MPuXgA%2F1mL1e9PVKhDwdANKt1Uy0cMK74%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> >
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Those who want to help create a presence for Royale on SO are certainly welcome and have my thanks for doing so.
I think an "apacheroyale" tag is best.
I would not recommend making SO our main user support channel at this time. Some ASF projects do, but we already have users@ and also I think myself and others are unable to help on SO. I've had trouble getting established on SO in the past. In fact, I just tried logging in there again and I think they erased my account so I had to sign up again.
I'll keep trying if I have a few moments here and there, but for now I'll mainly help on the mailing lists.
-Alex
On 3/4/19, 8:42 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
Another one:
Question: Why isn't JSON working in my Royale app?
Answer: Either use variable["property"] syntax or enable the -js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true compiler option.
- Josh
On 2019/03/04 16:41:03, Josh Tynjala <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Recently, I edited an answer to an old question about AS3 IDEs recently (to add VSCode and Moonshine), and the original question (which had been up for years) was almost instantly closed by moderators. StackOverflow has become very strict about open-ended questions that are more appropriate to discussion forums. Choose your questions wisely.
>
> More specific questions that can be solved with a small code example are probably the best choice.
>
> Look for issues that come up frequently. For instance, there are often problems if someone forgets to add a data binding bead to a component. In the question, you'll want a component that is broken because it's missing the bead. In the answer, show them which bead to add and where it should be added.
>
> In fact, more questions involving beads are probably great candidates!
>
> Question: How do I use some feature in component X.
> Answer: This feature isn't enabled by default, but you can add Y bead to the component.
>
> - Josh
>
> On 2019/03/04 13:14:09, Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > "apacheroyale" is fine with me.
> >
> > SO's tutorial suggests that open-ended discussion-type questions fare worse
> > on the site than specific, solution-focused questions. I wonder if it would
> > be considered spam to "recreate" some of the conversations on tricky
> > Flex-to-Royale issues that we have already talked through in this channel.
> > Feels a bit like reality-show tv to me... An alternative would be to post
> > some of the current, not-yet-resolved questions. We might even attract
> > interesting response from outside the existing Royale community.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:57 AM Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm opt for "apacheroyale" - I'm using it for almost all posts on
> > > Moonshine's IDE twitter and fb, so it could be somehow consistent. ;)
> > >
> > > pon., 4 mar 2019 o 13:23 Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Carlos and I were pondering possible tags for such an adventure. Options
> > > > seem to include "apacheroyale", "apache-royale", or just plain "royale".
> > > It
> > > > is telling that none of these tags currently exist.
> > > >
> > > > I am happy to lob softball questions to get conversations started, maybe:
> > > >
> > > > - What's the best migration path away from Flash for an enterprise-level
> > > > Flex app?
> > > > - What are the options for IDEs for developing in JS? [I note that
> > > > "moonshine" is not a recognized tag on SO at the moment]
> > > > - How can I reuse my AS3 and MXML code if Flash is not an option?
> > > > Other leading questions?
> > > >
> > > > I am happy to be the naive question-asker, but of course getting juice
> > > into
> > > > these conversations (and maybe drawing conversation-browsers toward
> > > Royale)
> > > > depends on those who have already found Royale providing answers.
> > > >
> > > > a
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I as you used Stackoverflow just for consulting. Just create my account
> > > > > now, so I'm learning too.
> > > > >
> > > > > What does mean for Apache Royale? Nowadays, a way to measure tech
> > > impact
> > > > > and how others could choose to go with Royale is see how easy is to
> > > find
> > > > > answers to questions. So you know, we want to know how something is
> > > done
> > > > > and people instead to go to normal docs, he google it, and normally for
> > > > > development problems stack overflow use to have responses.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, how we could "start"? I think we'll need to enter some common
> > > > > questions and maybe respond ourselves ? I really don't know, but there
> > > > > should be some way to start and have a "apacheroyale" tag for all the
> > > > > question related to us.
> > > > >
> > > > > For example, I think Andrew could be a good active to starting this if
> > > he
> > > > > thing is interesting, both investigating the way to do it and starting
> > > > some
> > > > > questions so we can answer and easing the rest of us entering SO
> > > world..
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 10:42, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do you mean ?
> > > I'm
> > > > >> rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does presence of Royale
> > > > can
> > > > >> be printed there ?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to
> > > answer
> > > > >> SO
> > > > >> > questions.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Harbs
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> > > carlosrovira@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Hi,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on
> > > > Stackoverflow.
> > > > >> > > Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing
> > > presence
> > > > >> over
> > > > >> > > time should be a key goal for us.
> > > > >> > > What do you think?
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Thanks
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > --
> > > > >> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > >> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=1iU6%2FVaeWueZID2a9d%2BFBRhOsH6sD9Ko60XZhyuBlB8%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=kcGeJoth0t22Q6CbKEyjfjWf6St1ZkkWyRCMJraHA5Q%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=kcGeJoth0t22Q6CbKEyjfjWf6St1ZkkWyRCMJraHA5Q%3D&reserved=0>*
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=1iU6%2FVaeWueZID2a9d%2BFBRhOsH6sD9Ko60XZhyuBlB8%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Andrew Wetmore
> > > >
> > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=yKLxv%2FAi42MPuXgA%2F1mL1e9PVKhDwdANKt1Uy0cMK74%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=kcGeJoth0t22Q6CbKEyjfjWf6St1ZkkWyRCMJraHA5Q%3D&reserved=0
> > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=kcGeJoth0t22Q6CbKEyjfjWf6St1ZkkWyRCMJraHA5Q%3D&reserved=0>*
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&sdata=yKLxv%2FAi42MPuXgA%2F1mL1e9PVKhDwdANKt1Uy0cMK74%3D&reserved=0
> >
>
Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow
Posted by Josh Tynjala <jo...@apache.org>.
Another one:
Question: Why isn't JSON working in my Royale app?
Answer: Either use variable["property"] syntax or enable the -js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true compiler option.
- Josh
On 2019/03/04 16:41:03, Josh Tynjala <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Recently, I edited an answer to an old question about AS3 IDEs recently (to add VSCode and Moonshine), and the original question (which had been up for years) was almost instantly closed by moderators. StackOverflow has become very strict about open-ended questions that are more appropriate to discussion forums. Choose your questions wisely.
>
> More specific questions that can be solved with a small code example are probably the best choice.
>
> Look for issues that come up frequently. For instance, there are often problems if someone forgets to add a data binding bead to a component. In the question, you'll want a component that is broken because it's missing the bead. In the answer, show them which bead to add and where it should be added.
>
> In fact, more questions involving beads are probably great candidates!
>
> Question: How do I use some feature in component X.
> Answer: This feature isn't enabled by default, but you can add Y bead to the component.
>
> - Josh
>
> On 2019/03/04 13:14:09, Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > "apacheroyale" is fine with me.
> >
> > SO's tutorial suggests that open-ended discussion-type questions fare worse
> > on the site than specific, solution-focused questions. I wonder if it would
> > be considered spam to "recreate" some of the conversations on tricky
> > Flex-to-Royale issues that we have already talked through in this channel.
> > Feels a bit like reality-show tv to me... An alternative would be to post
> > some of the current, not-yet-resolved questions. We might even attract
> > interesting response from outside the existing Royale community.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:57 AM Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm opt for "apacheroyale" - I'm using it for almost all posts on
> > > Moonshine's IDE twitter and fb, so it could be somehow consistent. ;)
> > >
> > > pon., 4 mar 2019 o 13:23 Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Carlos and I were pondering possible tags for such an adventure. Options
> > > > seem to include "apacheroyale", "apache-royale", or just plain "royale".
> > > It
> > > > is telling that none of these tags currently exist.
> > > >
> > > > I am happy to lob softball questions to get conversations started, maybe:
> > > >
> > > > - What's the best migration path away from Flash for an enterprise-level
> > > > Flex app?
> > > > - What are the options for IDEs for developing in JS? [I note that
> > > > "moonshine" is not a recognized tag on SO at the moment]
> > > > - How can I reuse my AS3 and MXML code if Flash is not an option?
> > > > Other leading questions?
> > > >
> > > > I am happy to be the naive question-asker, but of course getting juice
> > > into
> > > > these conversations (and maybe drawing conversation-browsers toward
> > > Royale)
> > > > depends on those who have already found Royale providing answers.
> > > >
> > > > a
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I as you used Stackoverflow just for consulting. Just create my account
> > > > > now, so I'm learning too.
> > > > >
> > > > > What does mean for Apache Royale? Nowadays, a way to measure tech
> > > impact
> > > > > and how others could choose to go with Royale is see how easy is to
> > > find
> > > > > answers to questions. So you know, we want to know how something is
> > > done
> > > > > and people instead to go to normal docs, he google it, and normally for
> > > > > development problems stack overflow use to have responses.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, how we could "start"? I think we'll need to enter some common
> > > > > questions and maybe respond ourselves ? I really don't know, but there
> > > > > should be some way to start and have a "apacheroyale" tag for all the
> > > > > question related to us.
> > > > >
> > > > > For example, I think Andrew could be a good active to starting this if
> > > he
> > > > > thing is interesting, both investigating the way to do it and starting
> > > > some
> > > > > questions so we can answer and easing the rest of us entering SO
> > > world..
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 10:42, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do you mean ?
> > > I'm
> > > > >> rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does presence of Royale
> > > > can
> > > > >> be printed there ?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to
> > > answer
> > > > >> SO
> > > > >> > questions.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Harbs
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> > > carlosrovira@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Hi,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on
> > > > Stackoverflow.
> > > > >> > > Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing
> > > presence
> > > > >> over
> > > > >> > > time should be a key goal for us.
> > > > >> > > What do you think?
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Thanks
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > --
> > > > >> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > >> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > > >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Andrew Wetmore
> > > >
> > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >
>
Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow
Posted by Josh Tynjala <jo...@apache.org>.
Recently, I edited an answer to an old question about AS3 IDEs recently (to add VSCode and Moonshine), and the original question (which had been up for years) was almost instantly closed by moderators. StackOverflow has become very strict about open-ended questions that are more appropriate to discussion forums. Choose your questions wisely.
More specific questions that can be solved with a small code example are probably the best choice.
Look for issues that come up frequently. For instance, there are often problems if someone forgets to add a data binding bead to a component. In the question, you'll want a component that is broken because it's missing the bead. In the answer, show them which bead to add and where it should be added.
In fact, more questions involving beads are probably great candidates!
Question: How do I use some feature in component X.
Answer: This feature isn't enabled by default, but you can add Y bead to the component.
- Josh
On 2019/03/04 13:14:09, Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "apacheroyale" is fine with me.
>
> SO's tutorial suggests that open-ended discussion-type questions fare worse
> on the site than specific, solution-focused questions. I wonder if it would
> be considered spam to "recreate" some of the conversations on tricky
> Flex-to-Royale issues that we have already talked through in this channel.
> Feels a bit like reality-show tv to me... An alternative would be to post
> some of the current, not-yet-resolved questions. We might even attract
> interesting response from outside the existing Royale community.
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:57 AM Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm opt for "apacheroyale" - I'm using it for almost all posts on
> > Moonshine's IDE twitter and fb, so it could be somehow consistent. ;)
> >
> > pon., 4 mar 2019 o 13:23 Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> >
> > > Carlos and I were pondering possible tags for such an adventure. Options
> > > seem to include "apacheroyale", "apache-royale", or just plain "royale".
> > It
> > > is telling that none of these tags currently exist.
> > >
> > > I am happy to lob softball questions to get conversations started, maybe:
> > >
> > > - What's the best migration path away from Flash for an enterprise-level
> > > Flex app?
> > > - What are the options for IDEs for developing in JS? [I note that
> > > "moonshine" is not a recognized tag on SO at the moment]
> > > - How can I reuse my AS3 and MXML code if Flash is not an option?
> > > Other leading questions?
> > >
> > > I am happy to be the naive question-asker, but of course getting juice
> > into
> > > these conversations (and maybe drawing conversation-browsers toward
> > Royale)
> > > depends on those who have already found Royale providing answers.
> > >
> > > a
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I as you used Stackoverflow just for consulting. Just create my account
> > > > now, so I'm learning too.
> > > >
> > > > What does mean for Apache Royale? Nowadays, a way to measure tech
> > impact
> > > > and how others could choose to go with Royale is see how easy is to
> > find
> > > > answers to questions. So you know, we want to know how something is
> > done
> > > > and people instead to go to normal docs, he google it, and normally for
> > > > development problems stack overflow use to have responses.
> > > >
> > > > So, how we could "start"? I think we'll need to enter some common
> > > > questions and maybe respond ourselves ? I really don't know, but there
> > > > should be some way to start and have a "apacheroyale" tag for all the
> > > > question related to us.
> > > >
> > > > For example, I think Andrew could be a good active to starting this if
> > he
> > > > thing is interesting, both investigating the way to do it and starting
> > > some
> > > > questions so we can answer and easing the rest of us entering SO
> > world..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 10:42, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > >
> > > >> Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do you mean ?
> > I'm
> > > >> rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does presence of Royale
> > > can
> > > >> be printed there ?
> > > >>
> > > >> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> > > >>
> > > >> > Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to
> > answer
> > > >> SO
> > > >> > questions.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Harbs
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrovira@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Hi,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on
> > > Stackoverflow.
> > > >> > > Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing
> > presence
> > > >> over
> > > >> > > time should be a key goal for us.
> > > >> > > What do you think?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thanks
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > --
> > > >> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > >> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >>
> > > >> Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >>
> > > >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Wetmore
> > >
> > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>
Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow
Posted by Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>.
"apacheroyale" is fine with me.
SO's tutorial suggests that open-ended discussion-type questions fare worse
on the site than specific, solution-focused questions. I wonder if it would
be considered spam to "recreate" some of the conversations on tricky
Flex-to-Royale issues that we have already talked through in this channel.
Feels a bit like reality-show tv to me... An alternative would be to post
some of the current, not-yet-resolved questions. We might even attract
interesting response from outside the existing Royale community.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:57 AM Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'm opt for "apacheroyale" - I'm using it for almost all posts on
> Moonshine's IDE twitter and fb, so it could be somehow consistent. ;)
>
> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 13:23 Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>
> > Carlos and I were pondering possible tags for such an adventure. Options
> > seem to include "apacheroyale", "apache-royale", or just plain "royale".
> It
> > is telling that none of these tags currently exist.
> >
> > I am happy to lob softball questions to get conversations started, maybe:
> >
> > - What's the best migration path away from Flash for an enterprise-level
> > Flex app?
> > - What are the options for IDEs for developing in JS? [I note that
> > "moonshine" is not a recognized tag on SO at the moment]
> > - How can I reuse my AS3 and MXML code if Flash is not an option?
> > Other leading questions?
> >
> > I am happy to be the naive question-asker, but of course getting juice
> into
> > these conversations (and maybe drawing conversation-browsers toward
> Royale)
> > depends on those who have already found Royale providing answers.
> >
> > a
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I as you used Stackoverflow just for consulting. Just create my account
> > > now, so I'm learning too.
> > >
> > > What does mean for Apache Royale? Nowadays, a way to measure tech
> impact
> > > and how others could choose to go with Royale is see how easy is to
> find
> > > answers to questions. So you know, we want to know how something is
> done
> > > and people instead to go to normal docs, he google it, and normally for
> > > development problems stack overflow use to have responses.
> > >
> > > So, how we could "start"? I think we'll need to enter some common
> > > questions and maybe respond ourselves ? I really don't know, but there
> > > should be some way to start and have a "apacheroyale" tag for all the
> > > question related to us.
> > >
> > > For example, I think Andrew could be a good active to starting this if
> he
> > > thing is interesting, both investigating the way to do it and starting
> > some
> > > questions so we can answer and easing the rest of us entering SO
> world..
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 10:42, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > >> Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do you mean ?
> I'm
> > >> rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does presence of Royale
> > can
> > >> be printed there ?
> > >>
> > >> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> > >>
> > >> > Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to
> answer
> > >> SO
> > >> > questions.
> > >> >
> > >> > Harbs
> > >> >
> > >> > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrovira@apache.org
> > >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hi,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on
> > Stackoverflow.
> > >> > > Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing
> presence
> > >> over
> > >> > > time should be a key goal for us.
> > >> > > What do you think?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Carlos Rovira
> > >> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Piotr Zarzycki
> > >>
> > >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>
--
Andrew Wetmore
http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
I'm opt for "apacheroyale" - I'm using it for almost all posts on
Moonshine's IDE twitter and fb, so it could be somehow consistent. ;)
pon., 4 mar 2019 o 13:23 Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> Carlos and I were pondering possible tags for such an adventure. Options
> seem to include "apacheroyale", "apache-royale", or just plain "royale". It
> is telling that none of these tags currently exist.
>
> I am happy to lob softball questions to get conversations started, maybe:
>
> - What's the best migration path away from Flash for an enterprise-level
> Flex app?
> - What are the options for IDEs for developing in JS? [I note that
> "moonshine" is not a recognized tag on SO at the moment]
> - How can I reuse my AS3 and MXML code if Flash is not an option?
> Other leading questions?
>
> I am happy to be the naive question-asker, but of course getting juice into
> these conversations (and maybe drawing conversation-browsers toward Royale)
> depends on those who have already found Royale providing answers.
>
> a
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I as you used Stackoverflow just for consulting. Just create my account
> > now, so I'm learning too.
> >
> > What does mean for Apache Royale? Nowadays, a way to measure tech impact
> > and how others could choose to go with Royale is see how easy is to find
> > answers to questions. So you know, we want to know how something is done
> > and people instead to go to normal docs, he google it, and normally for
> > development problems stack overflow use to have responses.
> >
> > So, how we could "start"? I think we'll need to enter some common
> > questions and maybe respond ourselves ? I really don't know, but there
> > should be some way to start and have a "apacheroyale" tag for all the
> > question related to us.
> >
> > For example, I think Andrew could be a good active to starting this if he
> > thing is interesting, both investigating the way to do it and starting
> some
> > questions so we can answer and easing the rest of us entering SO world..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 10:42, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> >> Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do you mean ? I'm
> >> rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does presence of Royale
> can
> >> be printed there ?
> >>
> >> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> >>
> >> > Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to answer
> >> SO
> >> > questions.
> >> >
> >> > Harbs
> >> >
> >> > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on
> Stackoverflow.
> >> > > Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing presence
> >> over
> >> > > time should be a key goal for us.
> >> > > What do you think?
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Carlos Rovira
> >> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>
> >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
> >
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow
Posted by Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>.
Carlos and I were pondering possible tags for such an adventure. Options
seem to include "apacheroyale", "apache-royale", or just plain "royale". It
is telling that none of these tags currently exist.
I am happy to lob softball questions to get conversations started, maybe:
- What's the best migration path away from Flash for an enterprise-level
Flex app?
- What are the options for IDEs for developing in JS? [I note that
"moonshine" is not a recognized tag on SO at the moment]
- How can I reuse my AS3 and MXML code if Flash is not an option?
Other leading questions?
I am happy to be the naive question-asker, but of course getting juice into
these conversations (and maybe drawing conversation-browsers toward Royale)
depends on those who have already found Royale providing answers.
a
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I as you used Stackoverflow just for consulting. Just create my account
> now, so I'm learning too.
>
> What does mean for Apache Royale? Nowadays, a way to measure tech impact
> and how others could choose to go with Royale is see how easy is to find
> answers to questions. So you know, we want to know how something is done
> and people instead to go to normal docs, he google it, and normally for
> development problems stack overflow use to have responses.
>
> So, how we could "start"? I think we'll need to enter some common
> questions and maybe respond ourselves ? I really don't know, but there
> should be some way to start and have a "apacheroyale" tag for all the
> question related to us.
>
> For example, I think Andrew could be a good active to starting this if he
> thing is interesting, both investigating the way to do it and starting some
> questions so we can answer and easing the rest of us entering SO world..
>
>
>
>
>
> El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 10:42, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do you mean ? I'm
>> rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does presence of Royale can
>> be printed there ?
>>
>> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>>
>> > Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to answer
>> SO
>> > questions.
>> >
>> > Harbs
>> >
>> > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on Stackoverflow.
>> > > Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing presence
>> over
>> > > time should be a key goal for us.
>> > > What do you think?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Carlos Rovira
>> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
--
Andrew Wetmore
http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi,
I as you used Stackoverflow just for consulting. Just create my account
now, so I'm learning too.
What does mean for Apache Royale? Nowadays, a way to measure tech impact
and how others could choose to go with Royale is see how easy is to find
answers to questions. So you know, we want to know how something is done
and people instead to go to normal docs, he google it, and normally for
development problems stack overflow use to have responses.
So, how we could "start"? I think we'll need to enter some common questions
and maybe respond ourselves ? I really don't know, but there should be some
way to start and have a "apacheroyale" tag for all the question related to
us.
For example, I think Andrew could be a good active to starting this if he
thing is interesting, both investigating the way to do it and starting some
questions so we can answer and easing the rest of us entering SO world..
El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 10:42, Piotr Zarzycki (<pi...@gmail.com>)
escribió:
> Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do you mean ? I'm
> rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does presence of Royale can
> be printed there ?
>
> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>
> > Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to answer SO
> > questions.
> >
> > Harbs
> >
> > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on Stackoverflow.
> > > Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing presence
> over
> > > time should be a key goal for us.
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do you mean ? I'm
rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does presence of Royale can
be printed there ?
pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to answer SO
> questions.
>
> Harbs
>
> > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on Stackoverflow.
> > Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing presence over
> > time should be a key goal for us.
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to answer SO questions.
Harbs
> On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on Stackoverflow.
> Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing presence over
> time should be a key goal for us.
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira