You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@logging.apache.org by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> on 2017/04/21 06:41:32 UTC
[log4j] Log4j Java 9 support has been added
I’ve pushed the support for Java 9 and Stackwalker. Java 9 is now required to build Log4j in addition to Java 7.
Ralph
Re: [log4j] Log4j Java 9 support has been added
Posted by Mikael Ståldal <mi...@magine.com>.
OK, I can change JDK per module.
Now I cannot build log4j-jmx-gui since the class
com.sun.tools.jconsole.JConsolePlugin (used in our ClientGuiJConsolePlugin)
doesn't seem to work with JDK 9. I tried to set that module to JDK 7, but
it doesn't help.
It is not good that we break a popular IDE like IntelliJ IDEA in this way.
That might scare away potential developers.
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
wrote:
> Sure you can. In the project settings select the module. You can change it
> there.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Apr 26, 2017, at 7:35 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mi...@magine.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I don't think you can specify different JDK:s for different modules with
> > IntelliJ. You can specify different source and target levels, but that
> > doesn't help here. Even though I set log4j-perf to 1.7, I get that error.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> You could compile the api module with Java 9 and the rest with Java 7.
> >> Until the module-info.java files are added the api module is the only
> thing
> >> that has Java 9 code in it.
> >>
> >> Ralph
> >>
> >>> On Apr 26, 2017, at 6:55 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mikael.staldal@magine.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I was able to get log4j-api to build by manually installing JDK 9 and
> >>> setting JDK 9 for that module. But now it fails in log4j-perf with the
> >>> error below.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe related to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8152842
> >>>
> >>> Error:java: Annotation generator had thrown the exception.
> >>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/annotation/Generated
> >>> at
> >>> org.openjdk.jmh.generators.core.BenchmarkGenerator.generateImport(
> >> BenchmarkGenerator.java:564)
> >>> at
> >>> org.openjdk.jmh.generators.core.BenchmarkGenerator.generateClass(
> >> BenchmarkGenerator.java:522)
> >>> at
> >>> org.openjdk.jmh.generators.core.BenchmarkGenerator.
> >> generate(BenchmarkGenerator.java:117)
> >>> at
> >>> org.openjdk.jmh.generators.BenchmarkProcessor.process(
> >> BenchmarkProcessor.java:52)
> >>> at
> >>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.
> JavacProcessingEnvironment.
> >> callProcessor(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:968)
> >>> at
> >>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.
> JavacProcessingEnvironment.
> >> discoverAndRunProcs(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:884)
> >>> at
> >>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.
> JavacProcessingEnvironment.
> >> access$2200(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:108)
> >>> at
> >>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.
> JavacProcessingEnvironment$
> >> Round.run(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:1206)
> >>> at
> >>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.
> JavacProcessingEnvironment.
> >> doProcessing(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:1315)
> >>> at
> >>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.main.JavaCompiler.processAnnotations(
> >> JavaCompiler.java:1246)
> >>> at
> >>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.main.JavaCompiler.
> >> compile(JavaCompiler.java:922)
> >>> at
> >>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.
> >> lambda$doCall$0(JavacTaskImpl.java:100)
> >>> at
> >>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.handleExceptions(
> >> JavacTaskImpl.java:142)
> >>> at
> >>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.
> >> doCall(JavacTaskImpl.java:96)
> >>> at
> >>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.call(
> >> JavacTaskImpl.java:90)
> >>> at org.jetbrains.jps.javac.JavacMain.compile(JavacMain.java:185)
> >>> at
> >>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.compileJava(
> >> JavaBuilder.java:475)
> >>> at
> >>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.compile(
> >> JavaBuilder.java:331)
> >>> at
> >>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.doBuild(
> >> JavaBuilder.java:249)
> >>> at
> >>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.build(
> >> JavaBuilder.java:213)
> >>> at
> >>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.
> runModuleLevelBuilders(
> >> IncProjectBuilder.java:1263)
> >>> at
> >>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.runBuildersForChunk(
> >> IncProjectBuilder.java:940)
> >>> at
> >>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.buildTargetsChunk(
> >> IncProjectBuilder.java:1012)
> >>> at
> >>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.buildChunkIfAffected(
> >> IncProjectBuilder.java:903)
> >>> at
> >>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.buildChunks(
> >> IncProjectBuilder.java:736)
> >>> at
> >>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.runBuild(
> >> IncProjectBuilder.java:384)
> >>> at
> >>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.build(
> >> IncProjectBuilder.java:192)
> >>> at org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildRunner.runBuild(
> BuildRunner.java:138)
> >>> at org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildSession.runBuild(
> >> BuildSession.java:295)
> >>> at org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildSession.run(BuildSession.java:125)
> >>> at
> >>> org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildMain$MyMessageHandler.
> >> lambda$channelRead0$0(BuildMain.java:236)
> >>> at
> >>> org.jetbrains.jps.service.impl.SharedThreadPoolImpl.
> >> lambda$executeOnPooledThread$0(SharedThreadPoolImpl.java:42)
> >>> at
> >>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(
> >> Executors.java:514)
> >>> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
> >>> at
> >>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.
> >> runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1161)
> >>> at
> >>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$
> >> Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
> >>> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)
> >>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> javax.annotation.Generated
> >>> at java.base/java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(
> URLClassLoader.java:466)
> >>> at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:540)
> >>> at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:473)
> >>> ... 37 more
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Apache <ra...@dslextreme.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> You could try using java 9
> >>>>
> >>>> Sent from my iPad
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Apr 26, 2017, at 2:20 AM, Mikael Ståldal <
> mikael.staldal@magine.com
> >>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Now I cannot build the project in IntelliJ IDEA anymore. It complains
> >>>> that
> >>>>> lambda expressions are not supported in Java 7 in
> >>>> StackWalkerStackLocator.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any suggestions?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Mikael Ståldal <
> >>>> mikael.staldal@magine.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Should the vendor of the Java 7, 8 and 9 toolchains be "sun"?
> >> Shouldn't
> >>>> it
> >>>>>> be "oracle"?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 🎉🎉🎉
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 21 April 2017 at 01:41, Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com
> >
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I’ve pushed the support for Java 9 and Stackwalker. Java 9 is now
> >>>>>>> required
> >>>>>>>> to build Log4j in addition to Java 7.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ralph
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> [image: MagineTV]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> *Mikael Ståldal*
> >>>>>> Senior software developer
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> *Magine TV*
> >>>>>> mikael.staldal@magine.com
> >>>>>> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
> >>>>>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> >>>>>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you
> may
> >>>> not
> >>>>>> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> >>>>>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
> reply
> >>>>>> email.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> [image: MagineTV]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *Mikael Ståldal*
> >>>>> Senior software developer
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *Magine TV*
> >>>>> mikael.staldal@magine.com
> >>>>> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
> >>>>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> >>>>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you
> may
> >>>> not
> >>>>> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> >>>>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
> >>>>> email.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> [image: MagineTV]
> >>>
> >>> *Mikael Ståldal*
> >>> Senior software developer
> >>>
> >>> *Magine TV*
> >>> mikael.staldal@magine.com
> >>> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
> >>>
> >>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
> >>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> >>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may
> >> not
> >>> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> >>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
> >>> email.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > [image: MagineTV]
> >
> > *Mikael Ståldal*
> > Senior software developer
> >
> > *Magine TV*
> > mikael.staldal@magine.com
> > Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
> >
> > Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
> > message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> > (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may
> not
> > copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> > you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
> > email.
>
>
>
--
[image: MagineTV]
*Mikael Ståldal*
Senior software developer
*Magine TV*
mikael.staldal@magine.com
Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
(or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not
copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
email.
Re: [log4j] Log4j Java 9 support has been added
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
Sure you can. In the project settings select the module. You can change it there.
Ralph
> On Apr 26, 2017, at 7:35 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mi...@magine.com> wrote:
>
> I don't think you can specify different JDK:s for different modules with
> IntelliJ. You can specify different source and target levels, but that
> doesn't help here. Even though I set log4j-perf to 1.7, I get that error.
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
>
>> You could compile the api module with Java 9 and the rest with Java 7.
>> Until the module-info.java files are added the api module is the only thing
>> that has Java 9 code in it.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>> On Apr 26, 2017, at 6:55 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mi...@magine.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I was able to get log4j-api to build by manually installing JDK 9 and
>>> setting JDK 9 for that module. But now it fails in log4j-perf with the
>>> error below.
>>>
>>> Maybe related to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8152842
>>>
>>> Error:java: Annotation generator had thrown the exception.
>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/annotation/Generated
>>> at
>>> org.openjdk.jmh.generators.core.BenchmarkGenerator.generateImport(
>> BenchmarkGenerator.java:564)
>>> at
>>> org.openjdk.jmh.generators.core.BenchmarkGenerator.generateClass(
>> BenchmarkGenerator.java:522)
>>> at
>>> org.openjdk.jmh.generators.core.BenchmarkGenerator.
>> generate(BenchmarkGenerator.java:117)
>>> at
>>> org.openjdk.jmh.generators.BenchmarkProcessor.process(
>> BenchmarkProcessor.java:52)
>>> at
>>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment.
>> callProcessor(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:968)
>>> at
>>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment.
>> discoverAndRunProcs(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:884)
>>> at
>>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment.
>> access$2200(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:108)
>>> at
>>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment$
>> Round.run(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:1206)
>>> at
>>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment.
>> doProcessing(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:1315)
>>> at
>>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.main.JavaCompiler.processAnnotations(
>> JavaCompiler.java:1246)
>>> at
>>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.main.JavaCompiler.
>> compile(JavaCompiler.java:922)
>>> at
>>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.
>> lambda$doCall$0(JavacTaskImpl.java:100)
>>> at
>>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.handleExceptions(
>> JavacTaskImpl.java:142)
>>> at
>>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.
>> doCall(JavacTaskImpl.java:96)
>>> at
>>> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.call(
>> JavacTaskImpl.java:90)
>>> at org.jetbrains.jps.javac.JavacMain.compile(JavacMain.java:185)
>>> at
>>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.compileJava(
>> JavaBuilder.java:475)
>>> at
>>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.compile(
>> JavaBuilder.java:331)
>>> at
>>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.doBuild(
>> JavaBuilder.java:249)
>>> at
>>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.build(
>> JavaBuilder.java:213)
>>> at
>>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.runModuleLevelBuilders(
>> IncProjectBuilder.java:1263)
>>> at
>>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.runBuildersForChunk(
>> IncProjectBuilder.java:940)
>>> at
>>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.buildTargetsChunk(
>> IncProjectBuilder.java:1012)
>>> at
>>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.buildChunkIfAffected(
>> IncProjectBuilder.java:903)
>>> at
>>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.buildChunks(
>> IncProjectBuilder.java:736)
>>> at
>>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.runBuild(
>> IncProjectBuilder.java:384)
>>> at
>>> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.build(
>> IncProjectBuilder.java:192)
>>> at org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildRunner.runBuild(BuildRunner.java:138)
>>> at org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildSession.runBuild(
>> BuildSession.java:295)
>>> at org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildSession.run(BuildSession.java:125)
>>> at
>>> org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildMain$MyMessageHandler.
>> lambda$channelRead0$0(BuildMain.java:236)
>>> at
>>> org.jetbrains.jps.service.impl.SharedThreadPoolImpl.
>> lambda$executeOnPooledThread$0(SharedThreadPoolImpl.java:42)
>>> at
>>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(
>> Executors.java:514)
>>> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
>>> at
>>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.
>> runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1161)
>>> at
>>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$
>> Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
>>> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)
>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javax.annotation.Generated
>>> at java.base/java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:466)
>>> at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:540)
>>> at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:473)
>>> ... 37 more
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Apache <ra...@dslextreme.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You could try using java 9
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 26, 2017, at 2:20 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mikael.staldal@magine.com
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Now I cannot build the project in IntelliJ IDEA anymore. It complains
>>>> that
>>>>> lambda expressions are not supported in Java 7 in
>>>> StackWalkerStackLocator.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Mikael Ståldal <
>>>> mikael.staldal@magine.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Should the vendor of the Java 7, 8 and 9 toolchains be "sun"?
>> Shouldn't
>>>> it
>>>>>> be "oracle"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 🎉🎉🎉
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 21 April 2017 at 01:41, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I’ve pushed the support for Java 9 and Stackwalker. Java 9 is now
>>>>>>> required
>>>>>>>> to build Log4j in addition to Java 7.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> [image: MagineTV]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Mikael Ståldal*
>>>>>> Senior software developer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Magine TV*
>>>>>> mikael.staldal@magine.com
>>>>>> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
>>>>>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
>>>>>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may
>>>> not
>>>>>> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
>>>>>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
>>>>>> email.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> [image: MagineTV]
>>>>>
>>>>> *Mikael Ståldal*
>>>>> Senior software developer
>>>>>
>>>>> *Magine TV*
>>>>> mikael.staldal@magine.com
>>>>> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
>>>>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
>>>>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may
>>>> not
>>>>> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
>>>>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
>>>>> email.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> [image: MagineTV]
>>>
>>> *Mikael Ståldal*
>>> Senior software developer
>>>
>>> *Magine TV*
>>> mikael.staldal@magine.com
>>> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
>>>
>>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
>>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
>>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may
>> not
>>> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
>>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
>>> email.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> [image: MagineTV]
>
> *Mikael Ståldal*
> Senior software developer
>
> *Magine TV*
> mikael.staldal@magine.com
> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
>
> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not
> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
> email.
Re: [log4j] Log4j Java 9 support has been added
Posted by Mikael Ståldal <mi...@magine.com>.
I don't think you can specify different JDK:s for different modules with
IntelliJ. You can specify different source and target levels, but that
doesn't help here. Even though I set log4j-perf to 1.7, I get that error.
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
wrote:
> You could compile the api module with Java 9 and the rest with Java 7.
> Until the module-info.java files are added the api module is the only thing
> that has Java 9 code in it.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Apr 26, 2017, at 6:55 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mi...@magine.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I was able to get log4j-api to build by manually installing JDK 9 and
> > setting JDK 9 for that module. But now it fails in log4j-perf with the
> > error below.
> >
> > Maybe related to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8152842
> >
> > Error:java: Annotation generator had thrown the exception.
> > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/annotation/Generated
> > at
> > org.openjdk.jmh.generators.core.BenchmarkGenerator.generateImport(
> BenchmarkGenerator.java:564)
> > at
> > org.openjdk.jmh.generators.core.BenchmarkGenerator.generateClass(
> BenchmarkGenerator.java:522)
> > at
> > org.openjdk.jmh.generators.core.BenchmarkGenerator.
> generate(BenchmarkGenerator.java:117)
> > at
> > org.openjdk.jmh.generators.BenchmarkProcessor.process(
> BenchmarkProcessor.java:52)
> > at
> > jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment.
> callProcessor(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:968)
> > at
> > jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment.
> discoverAndRunProcs(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:884)
> > at
> > jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment.
> access$2200(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:108)
> > at
> > jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment$
> Round.run(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:1206)
> > at
> > jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment.
> doProcessing(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:1315)
> > at
> > jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.main.JavaCompiler.processAnnotations(
> JavaCompiler.java:1246)
> > at
> > jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.main.JavaCompiler.
> compile(JavaCompiler.java:922)
> > at
> > jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.
> lambda$doCall$0(JavacTaskImpl.java:100)
> > at
> > jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.handleExceptions(
> JavacTaskImpl.java:142)
> > at
> > jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.
> doCall(JavacTaskImpl.java:96)
> > at
> > jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.call(
> JavacTaskImpl.java:90)
> > at org.jetbrains.jps.javac.JavacMain.compile(JavacMain.java:185)
> > at
> > org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.compileJava(
> JavaBuilder.java:475)
> > at
> > org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.compile(
> JavaBuilder.java:331)
> > at
> > org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.doBuild(
> JavaBuilder.java:249)
> > at
> > org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.build(
> JavaBuilder.java:213)
> > at
> > org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.runModuleLevelBuilders(
> IncProjectBuilder.java:1263)
> > at
> > org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.runBuildersForChunk(
> IncProjectBuilder.java:940)
> > at
> > org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.buildTargetsChunk(
> IncProjectBuilder.java:1012)
> > at
> > org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.buildChunkIfAffected(
> IncProjectBuilder.java:903)
> > at
> > org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.buildChunks(
> IncProjectBuilder.java:736)
> > at
> > org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.runBuild(
> IncProjectBuilder.java:384)
> > at
> > org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.build(
> IncProjectBuilder.java:192)
> > at org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildRunner.runBuild(BuildRunner.java:138)
> > at org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildSession.runBuild(
> BuildSession.java:295)
> > at org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildSession.run(BuildSession.java:125)
> > at
> > org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildMain$MyMessageHandler.
> lambda$channelRead0$0(BuildMain.java:236)
> > at
> > org.jetbrains.jps.service.impl.SharedThreadPoolImpl.
> lambda$executeOnPooledThread$0(SharedThreadPoolImpl.java:42)
> > at
> > java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(
> Executors.java:514)
> > at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
> > at
> > java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.
> runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1161)
> > at
> > java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$
> Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
> > at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)
> > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javax.annotation.Generated
> > at java.base/java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:466)
> > at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:540)
> > at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:473)
> > ... 37 more
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Apache <ra...@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> You could try using java 9
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPad
> >>
> >>> On Apr 26, 2017, at 2:20 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mikael.staldal@magine.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Now I cannot build the project in IntelliJ IDEA anymore. It complains
> >> that
> >>> lambda expressions are not supported in Java 7 in
> >> StackWalkerStackLocator.
> >>>
> >>> Any suggestions?
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Mikael Ståldal <
> >> mikael.staldal@magine.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Should the vendor of the Java 7, 8 and 9 toolchains be "sun"?
> Shouldn't
> >> it
> >>>> be "oracle"?
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 🎉🎉🎉
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 21 April 2017 at 01:41, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I’ve pushed the support for Java 9 and Stackwalker. Java 9 is now
> >>>>> required
> >>>>>> to build Log4j in addition to Java 7.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Ralph
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> [image: MagineTV]
> >>>>
> >>>> *Mikael Ståldal*
> >>>> Senior software developer
> >>>>
> >>>> *Magine TV*
> >>>> mikael.staldal@magine.com
> >>>> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
> >>>>
> >>>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
> >>>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> >>>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may
> >> not
> >>>> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> >>>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
> >>>> email.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> [image: MagineTV]
> >>>
> >>> *Mikael Ståldal*
> >>> Senior software developer
> >>>
> >>> *Magine TV*
> >>> mikael.staldal@magine.com
> >>> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
> >>>
> >>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
> >>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> >>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may
> >> not
> >>> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> >>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
> >>> email.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > [image: MagineTV]
> >
> > *Mikael Ståldal*
> > Senior software developer
> >
> > *Magine TV*
> > mikael.staldal@magine.com
> > Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
> >
> > Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
> > message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> > (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may
> not
> > copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> > you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
> > email.
>
>
>
--
[image: MagineTV]
*Mikael Ståldal*
Senior software developer
*Magine TV*
mikael.staldal@magine.com
Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
(or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not
copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
email.
Re: [log4j] Log4j Java 9 support has been added
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
You could compile the api module with Java 9 and the rest with Java 7. Until the module-info.java files are added the api module is the only thing that has Java 9 code in it.
Ralph
> On Apr 26, 2017, at 6:55 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mi...@magine.com> wrote:
>
> I was able to get log4j-api to build by manually installing JDK 9 and
> setting JDK 9 for that module. But now it fails in log4j-perf with the
> error below.
>
> Maybe related to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8152842
>
> Error:java: Annotation generator had thrown the exception.
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/annotation/Generated
> at
> org.openjdk.jmh.generators.core.BenchmarkGenerator.generateImport(BenchmarkGenerator.java:564)
> at
> org.openjdk.jmh.generators.core.BenchmarkGenerator.generateClass(BenchmarkGenerator.java:522)
> at
> org.openjdk.jmh.generators.core.BenchmarkGenerator.generate(BenchmarkGenerator.java:117)
> at
> org.openjdk.jmh.generators.BenchmarkProcessor.process(BenchmarkProcessor.java:52)
> at
> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment.callProcessor(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:968)
> at
> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment.discoverAndRunProcs(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:884)
> at
> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment.access$2200(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:108)
> at
> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment$Round.run(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:1206)
> at
> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment.doProcessing(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:1315)
> at
> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.main.JavaCompiler.processAnnotations(JavaCompiler.java:1246)
> at
> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.main.JavaCompiler.compile(JavaCompiler.java:922)
> at
> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.lambda$doCall$0(JavacTaskImpl.java:100)
> at
> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.handleExceptions(JavacTaskImpl.java:142)
> at
> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.doCall(JavacTaskImpl.java:96)
> at
> jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.call(JavacTaskImpl.java:90)
> at org.jetbrains.jps.javac.JavacMain.compile(JavacMain.java:185)
> at
> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.compileJava(JavaBuilder.java:475)
> at
> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.compile(JavaBuilder.java:331)
> at
> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.doBuild(JavaBuilder.java:249)
> at
> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.build(JavaBuilder.java:213)
> at
> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.runModuleLevelBuilders(IncProjectBuilder.java:1263)
> at
> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.runBuildersForChunk(IncProjectBuilder.java:940)
> at
> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.buildTargetsChunk(IncProjectBuilder.java:1012)
> at
> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.buildChunkIfAffected(IncProjectBuilder.java:903)
> at
> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.buildChunks(IncProjectBuilder.java:736)
> at
> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.runBuild(IncProjectBuilder.java:384)
> at
> org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.build(IncProjectBuilder.java:192)
> at org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildRunner.runBuild(BuildRunner.java:138)
> at org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildSession.runBuild(BuildSession.java:295)
> at org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildSession.run(BuildSession.java:125)
> at
> org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildMain$MyMessageHandler.lambda$channelRead0$0(BuildMain.java:236)
> at
> org.jetbrains.jps.service.impl.SharedThreadPoolImpl.lambda$executeOnPooledThread$0(SharedThreadPoolImpl.java:42)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:514)
> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1161)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)
> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javax.annotation.Generated
> at java.base/java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:466)
> at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:540)
> at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:473)
> ... 37 more
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Apache <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
>> You could try using java 9
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>> On Apr 26, 2017, at 2:20 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mi...@magine.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Now I cannot build the project in IntelliJ IDEA anymore. It complains
>> that
>>> lambda expressions are not supported in Java 7 in
>> StackWalkerStackLocator.
>>>
>>> Any suggestions?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Mikael Ståldal <
>> mikael.staldal@magine.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Should the vendor of the Java 7, 8 and 9 toolchains be "sun"? Shouldn't
>> it
>>>> be "oracle"?
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> 🎉🎉🎉
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21 April 2017 at 01:41, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I’ve pushed the support for Java 9 and Stackwalker. Java 9 is now
>>>>> required
>>>>>> to build Log4j in addition to Java 7.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> [image: MagineTV]
>>>>
>>>> *Mikael Ståldal*
>>>> Senior software developer
>>>>
>>>> *Magine TV*
>>>> mikael.staldal@magine.com
>>>> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
>>>>
>>>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
>>>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
>>>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may
>> not
>>>> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
>>>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
>>>> email.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> [image: MagineTV]
>>>
>>> *Mikael Ståldal*
>>> Senior software developer
>>>
>>> *Magine TV*
>>> mikael.staldal@magine.com
>>> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
>>>
>>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
>>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
>>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may
>> not
>>> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
>>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
>>> email.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> [image: MagineTV]
>
> *Mikael Ståldal*
> Senior software developer
>
> *Magine TV*
> mikael.staldal@magine.com
> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
>
> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not
> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
> email.
Re: [log4j] Log4j Java 9 support has been added
Posted by Mikael Ståldal <mi...@magine.com>.
I was able to get log4j-api to build by manually installing JDK 9 and
setting JDK 9 for that module. But now it fails in log4j-perf with the
error below.
Maybe related to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8152842
Error:java: Annotation generator had thrown the exception.
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/annotation/Generated
at
org.openjdk.jmh.generators.core.BenchmarkGenerator.generateImport(BenchmarkGenerator.java:564)
at
org.openjdk.jmh.generators.core.BenchmarkGenerator.generateClass(BenchmarkGenerator.java:522)
at
org.openjdk.jmh.generators.core.BenchmarkGenerator.generate(BenchmarkGenerator.java:117)
at
org.openjdk.jmh.generators.BenchmarkProcessor.process(BenchmarkProcessor.java:52)
at
jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment.callProcessor(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:968)
at
jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment.discoverAndRunProcs(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:884)
at
jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment.access$2200(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:108)
at
jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment$Round.run(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:1206)
at
jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.processing.JavacProcessingEnvironment.doProcessing(JavacProcessingEnvironment.java:1315)
at
jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.main.JavaCompiler.processAnnotations(JavaCompiler.java:1246)
at
jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.main.JavaCompiler.compile(JavaCompiler.java:922)
at
jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.lambda$doCall$0(JavacTaskImpl.java:100)
at
jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.handleExceptions(JavacTaskImpl.java:142)
at
jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.doCall(JavacTaskImpl.java:96)
at
jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.call(JavacTaskImpl.java:90)
at org.jetbrains.jps.javac.JavacMain.compile(JavacMain.java:185)
at
org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.compileJava(JavaBuilder.java:475)
at
org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.compile(JavaBuilder.java:331)
at
org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.doBuild(JavaBuilder.java:249)
at
org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.java.JavaBuilder.build(JavaBuilder.java:213)
at
org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.runModuleLevelBuilders(IncProjectBuilder.java:1263)
at
org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.runBuildersForChunk(IncProjectBuilder.java:940)
at
org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.buildTargetsChunk(IncProjectBuilder.java:1012)
at
org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.buildChunkIfAffected(IncProjectBuilder.java:903)
at
org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.buildChunks(IncProjectBuilder.java:736)
at
org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.runBuild(IncProjectBuilder.java:384)
at
org.jetbrains.jps.incremental.IncProjectBuilder.build(IncProjectBuilder.java:192)
at org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildRunner.runBuild(BuildRunner.java:138)
at org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildSession.runBuild(BuildSession.java:295)
at org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildSession.run(BuildSession.java:125)
at
org.jetbrains.jps.cmdline.BuildMain$MyMessageHandler.lambda$channelRead0$0(BuildMain.java:236)
at
org.jetbrains.jps.service.impl.SharedThreadPoolImpl.lambda$executeOnPooledThread$0(SharedThreadPoolImpl.java:42)
at
java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:514)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
at
java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1161)
at
java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javax.annotation.Generated
at java.base/java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:466)
at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:540)
at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:473)
... 37 more
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Apache <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> You could try using java 9
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On Apr 26, 2017, at 2:20 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mi...@magine.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Now I cannot build the project in IntelliJ IDEA anymore. It complains
> that
> > lambda expressions are not supported in Java 7 in
> StackWalkerStackLocator.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Mikael Ståldal <
> mikael.staldal@magine.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Should the vendor of the Java 7, 8 and 9 toolchains be "sun"? Shouldn't
> it
> >> be "oracle"?
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 🎉🎉🎉
> >>>
> >>> On 21 April 2017 at 01:41, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I’ve pushed the support for Java 9 and Stackwalker. Java 9 is now
> >>> required
> >>>> to build Log4j in addition to Java 7.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ralph
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> [image: MagineTV]
> >>
> >> *Mikael Ståldal*
> >> Senior software developer
> >>
> >> *Magine TV*
> >> mikael.staldal@magine.com
> >> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
> >>
> >> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
> >> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> >> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may
> not
> >> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> >> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
> >> email.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > [image: MagineTV]
> >
> > *Mikael Ståldal*
> > Senior software developer
> >
> > *Magine TV*
> > mikael.staldal@magine.com
> > Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
> >
> > Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
> > message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> > (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may
> not
> > copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> > you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
> > email.
>
>
>
--
[image: MagineTV]
*Mikael Ståldal*
Senior software developer
*Magine TV*
mikael.staldal@magine.com
Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
(or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not
copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
email.
Re: [log4j] Log4j Java 9 support has been added
Posted by Apache <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
You could try using java 9
Sent from my iPad
> On Apr 26, 2017, at 2:20 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mi...@magine.com> wrote:
>
> Now I cannot build the project in IntelliJ IDEA anymore. It complains that
> lambda expressions are not supported in Java 7 in StackWalkerStackLocator.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mi...@magine.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Should the vendor of the Java 7, 8 and 9 toolchains be "sun"? Shouldn't it
>> be "oracle"?
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> 🎉🎉🎉
>>>
>>> On 21 April 2017 at 01:41, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I’ve pushed the support for Java 9 and Stackwalker. Java 9 is now
>>> required
>>>> to build Log4j in addition to Java 7.
>>>>
>>>> Ralph
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> [image: MagineTV]
>>
>> *Mikael Ståldal*
>> Senior software developer
>>
>> *Magine TV*
>> mikael.staldal@magine.com
>> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
>>
>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not
>> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
>> email.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> [image: MagineTV]
>
> *Mikael Ståldal*
> Senior software developer
>
> *Magine TV*
> mikael.staldal@magine.com
> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
>
> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not
> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
> email.
Re: [log4j] Log4j Java 9 support has been added
Posted by Mikael Ståldal <mi...@magine.com>.
Now I cannot build the project in IntelliJ IDEA anymore. It complains that
lambda expressions are not supported in Java 7 in StackWalkerStackLocator.
Any suggestions?
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mi...@magine.com>
wrote:
> Should the vendor of the Java 7, 8 and 9 toolchains be "sun"? Shouldn't it
> be "oracle"?
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 🎉🎉🎉
>>
>> On 21 April 2017 at 01:41, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I’ve pushed the support for Java 9 and Stackwalker. Java 9 is now
>> required
>> > to build Log4j in addition to Java 7.
>> >
>> > Ralph
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> [image: MagineTV]
>
> *Mikael Ståldal*
> Senior software developer
>
> *Magine TV*
> mikael.staldal@magine.com
> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
>
> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not
> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
> email.
>
--
[image: MagineTV]
*Mikael Ståldal*
Senior software developer
*Magine TV*
mikael.staldal@magine.com
Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
(or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not
copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
email.
Re: [log4j] Log4j Java 9 support has been added
Posted by Mikael Ståldal <mi...@magine.com>.
Should the vendor of the Java 7, 8 and 9 toolchains be "sun"? Shouldn't it
be "oracle"?
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 🎉🎉🎉
>
> On 21 April 2017 at 01:41, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
> > I’ve pushed the support for Java 9 and Stackwalker. Java 9 is now
> required
> > to build Log4j in addition to Java 7.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>
--
[image: MagineTV]
*Mikael Ståldal*
Senior software developer
*Magine TV*
mikael.staldal@magine.com
Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
(or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not
copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
email.
Re: [log4j] Log4j Java 9 support has been added
Posted by Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>.
🎉🎉🎉
On 21 April 2017 at 01:41, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> I’ve pushed the support for Java 9 and Stackwalker. Java 9 is now required
> to build Log4j in addition to Java 7.
>
> Ralph
>
--
Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>