You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2019/07/04 14:53:22 UTC

[GitHub] [flink] banmoy edited a comment on issue #8611: [FLINK-12693][state] Store state per key-group in CopyOnWriteStateTable

banmoy edited a comment on issue #8611: [FLINK-12693][state] Store state per key-group in CopyOnWriteStateTable
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/8611#issuecomment-508508804
 
 
   @StefanRRichter Thanks for the quick reply. I agree with you  that the ut is not resonable and needs to fix, but I'm not sure whether the ut should be fixed in this PR or in another. It seems that the problem is  irrelevant to this PR, and I prefer to fix it in anther PR.  What do you think? BTW, no matter where we fix it, I will take over the work.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services