Roller 2.1 / Jetty 5.1.10 / Postgres 8.1.2?

["Corbett J. Klempay" <ck...@acm.jhu.edu>]

Hello all --

I'm a first time Roller user.  I just downloaded 2.1 and thought I'd 
have a go at mating it with my existing Jetty 5.1.10 and Postgres 8.1.2 
installations.  Is anyone else already running this (or a very similar) 
combination?  I'd appreciate any guidance (as the Jetty-specific install 
document seems pretty stale at this point).

I did see the earlier thread started by Amy about Jetty being unhappy 
with the presence of dispatch elements in web.xml; I have commented 
those out already.  I'm not really all that knowledgeable with Jetty, 
either -- up to now, it's just been hosting a big JAlbum site.

Thanks!

- Corbett

Re: Roller 2.1 / Jetty 5.1.10 / Postgres 8.1.2?

[David M Johnson <Da...@Sun.COM>]

I just tried building for 2.4 and it looks like XDoclet did the right  
thing. I'll commit the 1 character change to build.xml once I verify  
that.

ROL-873: Supplied web.xml is not Servlet 2.4 compliant
Is now set to fix-for Roller 2.2

- Dave


On Mar 7, 2006, at 3:40 AM, Anil Gangolli wrote:

> Yipes.  Did we release another version without switching the  
> web.xml and its declared type formally to the Servlet 2.4 DTD?  I  
> thought we all agreed to this back in December, but I guess it  
> didn't actually happen and nobody caught it.  Were issues encountered?
> --a.
>
>
> Corbett J. Klempay wrote:
>> Hello all --
>>
>> I'm a first time Roller user.  I just downloaded 2.1 and thought  
>> I'd have a go at mating it with my existing Jetty 5.1.10 and  
>> Postgres 8.1.2 installations.  Is anyone else already running this  
>> (or a very similar) combination?  I'd appreciate any guidance (as  
>> the Jetty-specific install document seems pretty stale at this  
>> point).
>>
>> I did see the earlier thread started by Amy about Jetty being  
>> unhappy with the presence of dispatch elements in web.xml; I have  
>> commented those out already.  I'm not really all that  
>> knowledgeable with Jetty, either -- up to now, it's just been  
>> hosting a big JAlbum site.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> - Corbett
>>
>>

Re: Roller 2.1 / Jetty 5.1.10 / Postgres 8.1.2?

[Anil Gangolli <an...@busybuddha.org>]

I remember seeing something (possibly in a message by you?) saying that 
XDoclet had changed and this had opened up this path again, but I might 
be mistaken.  Were there issues still with the latest XDoclet?

--a.


David M Johnson wrote:
>
> On Mar 7, 2006, at 3:40 AM, Anil Gangolli wrote:
>> Yipes.  Did we release another version without switching the web.xml 
>> and its declared type formally to the Servlet 2.4 DTD?  I thought we 
>> all agreed to this back in December, but I guess it didn't actually 
>> happen and nobody caught it.  Were issues encountered?
>> --a.
>
> I didn't attempt to make the change in 2.1, but I did look at the 
> problem 4-5 months ago and ran into some XDoclet problems (2.4 wasn't 
> supported at that point).
>
> - Dave
>
>> Corbett J. Klempay wrote:
>>> Hello all --
>>>
>>> I'm a first time Roller user.  I just downloaded 2.1 and thought I'd 
>>> have a go at mating it with my existing Jetty 5.1.10 and Postgres 
>>> 8.1.2 installations.  Is anyone else already running this (or a very 
>>> similar) combination?  I'd appreciate any guidance (as the 
>>> Jetty-specific install document seems pretty stale at this point).
>>>
>>> I did see the earlier thread started by Amy about Jetty being 
>>> unhappy with the presence of dispatch elements in web.xml; I have 
>>> commented those out already.  I'm not really all that knowledgeable 
>>> with Jetty, either -- up to now, it's just been hosting a big JAlbum 
>>> site.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> - Corbett
>>>
>>>
>
>

Re: Roller 2.1 / Jetty 5.1.10 / Postgres 8.1.2?

[David M Johnson <Da...@Sun.COM>]

On Mar 7, 2006, at 3:40 AM, Anil Gangolli wrote:
> Yipes.  Did we release another version without switching the  
> web.xml and its declared type formally to the Servlet 2.4 DTD?  I  
> thought we all agreed to this back in December, but I guess it  
> didn't actually happen and nobody caught it.  Were issues encountered?
> --a.

I didn't attempt to make the change in 2.1, but I did look at the  
problem 4-5 months ago and ran into some XDoclet problems (2.4 wasn't  
supported at that point).

- Dave


>
>
> Corbett J. Klempay wrote:
>> Hello all --
>>
>> I'm a first time Roller user.  I just downloaded 2.1 and thought  
>> I'd have a go at mating it with my existing Jetty 5.1.10 and  
>> Postgres 8.1.2 installations.  Is anyone else already running this  
>> (or a very similar) combination?  I'd appreciate any guidance (as  
>> the Jetty-specific install document seems pretty stale at this  
>> point).
>>
>> I did see the earlier thread started by Amy about Jetty being  
>> unhappy with the presence of dispatch elements in web.xml; I have  
>> commented those out already.  I'm not really all that  
>> knowledgeable with Jetty, either -- up to now, it's just been  
>> hosting a big JAlbum site.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> - Corbett
>>
>>

Re: Roller 2.1 / Jetty 5.1.10 / Postgres 8.1.2?

[Anil Gangolli <an...@busybuddha.org>]

Yipes.  Did we release another version without switching the web.xml and 
its declared type formally to the Servlet 2.4 DTD?  I thought we all 
agreed to this back in December, but I guess it didn't actually happen 
and nobody caught it.  Were issues encountered? 

--a.


Corbett J. Klempay wrote:
> Hello all --
>
> I'm a first time Roller user.  I just downloaded 2.1 and thought I'd 
> have a go at mating it with my existing Jetty 5.1.10 and Postgres 
> 8.1.2 installations.  Is anyone else already running this (or a very 
> similar) combination?  I'd appreciate any guidance (as the 
> Jetty-specific install document seems pretty stale at this point).
>
> I did see the earlier thread started by Amy about Jetty being unhappy 
> with the presence of dispatch elements in web.xml; I have commented 
> those out already.  I'm not really all that knowledgeable with Jetty, 
> either -- up to now, it's just been hosting a big JAlbum site.
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Corbett
>
>