You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shiro.apache.org by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com> on 2009/01/30 17:19:32 UTC
Spring demo
At the moment the spring demo seems to be two demos in one. First is
a web app demo with Spring innards and the other is a standalone app
started w/ Java webstart.
I propose that we split the two into two separate samples. It will
make things a bit more clean.
Does this make sense?
Regards,
Alan
Re: Spring demo
Posted by Les Hazlewood <lh...@apache.org>.
Yep - the purpose of the Spring demo with webstart launched from it is to
show that a rich client front end and the server-side back end can share
session state - same application, two different client 'views' to the back
end (html + webstart --> backend).
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Jeremy Haile <jh...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> I think we should make a simpler Spring demo for sure. And probably should
> make a simple Swing demo.
>
> However, the current Spring demo is meant to show how JSecurity supports
> cross-application session sharing. So I don't think it makes sense to
> change that demo. (perhaps rename it to better explain its purpose)
>
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> At the moment the spring demo seems to be two demos in one. First is a
>> web app demo with Spring innards and the other is a standalone app started
>> w/ Java webstart.
>>
>> I propose that we split the two into two separate samples. It will make
>> things a bit more clean.
>>
>> Does this make sense?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>
>
Re: Spring demo
Posted by Jeremy Haile <jh...@fastmail.fm>.
I think we should make a simpler Spring demo for sure. And probably
should make a simple Swing demo.
However, the current Spring demo is meant to show how JSecurity
supports cross-application session sharing. So I don't think it makes
sense to change that demo. (perhaps rename it to better explain its
purpose)
On Jan 30, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> At the moment the spring demo seems to be two demos in one. First
> is a web app demo with Spring innards and the other is a standalone
> app started w/ Java webstart.
>
> I propose that we split the two into two separate samples. It will
> make things a bit more clean.
>
> Does this make sense?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan