You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@slider.apache.org by "Gour Saha (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/06/15 05:20:09 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (SLIDER-1005) The java code generated by protobuf
should not be placed in src directory
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLIDER-1005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Gour Saha updated SLIDER-1005:
------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: Slider 0.91)
Slider 1.0.0
> The java code generated by protobuf should not be placed in src directory
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLIDER-1005
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLIDER-1005
> Project: Slider
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: build, core
> Affects Versions: Slider 0.90.2
> Environment: Centos 6.5, Maven 3.2.5
> Reporter: Pan Yuxuan
> Assignee: Pan Yuxuan
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Slider 1.0.0
>
> Attachments: SLIDER-1005-001.patch
>
>
> Now slider using protobuf for RPC, but the output directory is <output>${basedir}/src/main/java</output> in slider-core/pom.xml. That means the generated java code was been placed in the src directory.
> I have seen the generated java code for protobuf in Hadoop, they put the code in build directory <output>${project.build.directory}/generated-sources/java</output>. And they put the compile-protoc in <plugin> not <profile> in the pom.xml.
> I think the way Hadoop used is more reasonable. The code is generated by protobuf, not by ourselves.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)