You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Nathan Hartman <ha...@gmail.com> on 2022/03/31 00:20:14 UTC
Re: svn commit: r1899394 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 4:10 PM <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: hartmannathan
> Date: Wed Mar 30 20:10:06 2022
> New Revision: 1899394
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1899394&view=rev
> Log:
> * branches/1.14.x/STATUS: Nominate r1896609 (bump copyright year to 2022)
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS?rev=1899394&r1=1899393&r2=1899394&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Wed Mar 30 20:10:06 2022
> @@ -46,6 +46,13 @@ Candidate changes:
> votes:
> +1: markphip
>
> + * r1896609
> + Bumps copyright date to 2022
> + Justification:
> + Show correct year in output.
> + Votes:
> + +1: hartmannathan
> +
> Veto-blocked changes:
> =====================
We should try to get the above backport nomination approved, both for
1.10.8 and 1.14.2, because it would look rather silly to release with last
year's copyright date.
I am in the process of digging through numerous changes on trunk to see if
there are additional ones appropriate for backport that were missed.
The others that I have nominated so far are, like the above, very low risk.
I'm trying to pick beneficial ones that I believe won't instigate any
last-minute complications like test failures etc.
Cheers,
Nathan
Re: svn commit: r1899394 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
Posted by Daniel Sahlberg <da...@gmail.com>.
Den tors 31 mars 2022 kl 02:21 skrev Nathan Hartman <
hartman.nathan@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 4:10 PM <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Author: hartmannathan
>> Date: Wed Mar 30 20:10:06 2022
>> New Revision: 1899394
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1899394&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * branches/1.14.x/STATUS: Nominate r1896609 (bump copyright year to 2022)
>>
>> Modified:
>> subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
>>
>> Modified: subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS?rev=1899394&r1=1899393&r2=1899394&view=diff
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS (original)
>> +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Wed Mar 30 20:10:06 2022
>> @@ -46,6 +46,13 @@ Candidate changes:
>> votes:
>> +1: markphip
>>
>> + * r1896609
>> + Bumps copyright date to 2022
>> + Justification:
>> + Show correct year in output.
>> + Votes:
>> + +1: hartmannathan
>> +
>> Veto-blocked changes:
>> =====================
>
>
>
> We should try to get the above backport nomination approved, both for
> 1.10.8 and 1.14.2, because it would look rather silly to release with last
> year's copyright date.
>
> I am in the process of digging through numerous changes on trunk to see if
> there are additional ones appropriate for backport that were missed.
>
> The others that I have nominated so far are, like the above, very low risk.
>
> I'm trying to pick beneficial ones that I believe won't instigate any
> last-minute complications like test failures etc.
>
Thanks for doing this! I've voted for them and while not explicitly
mentioned as exceptions in the voting process, I believe it doesn't count
as core code and thus I've also approved them.
They should be part of tomorrow's backport batch. I will be on the road
from early Friday morning (CET) until Sunday afternoon, but I'll try to
keep an eye on the backports to make sure everything goes smooth.
/Daniel