You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2006/01/04 14:33:04 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36306] - Collection of fixes to address Checkstyle complaints
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36306>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36306
husted@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|LATER |
------- Additional Comments From husted@apache.org 2006-01-04 14:33 -------
So, far I went at it from the other direction and updated the IDEA styles to do
what we would expect. The total count of Checkstyle errors went down, so we seem
to be moving in the right direction. When we have fewer Checkstyle errors, we
could tweak the IDEA styles a bit further. (Continuing to document the changes
as we go.) Of course, the same could be done with Eclipse or any other
reasonable IDE.
I'd like to try to work with JetBrains, Eclipse, NetBeans, et al, to devise a
standard way to express code formatting rules, ideally, so that we could checkin
a configuration file that various tools could share.
-T.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org