Re: cvs commit: avalon/fortress/container project.xml

[J Aaron Farr <fa...@apache.org>]

On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 19:38, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> Carsten:
> 
> A lifecycle extension dealing with an alternative configuration model 
> should not go under Fortress - instead it should be located somewhere 
> like excalibur-configuration or perhaps more appropriate .. 
> avalon-components.
> 
> What's your opinion?
> 
> Stephen.

was this commit part of this?

http://www.osoco.net/weblogs/rael/archives/000239.html

-- 
 jaaron  <http://jadetower.org>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org

Re: cvs commit: avalon/fortress/container project.xml

[Stephen McConnell <mc...@apache.org>]

J Aaron Farr wrote:

> On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 19:38, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> 
>>Carsten:
>>
>>A lifecycle extension dealing with an alternative configuration model 
>>should not go under Fortress - instead it should be located somewhere 
>>like excalibur-configuration or perhaps more appropriate .. 
>>avalon-components.
>>
>>What's your opinion?
>>
>>Stephen.
> 
> 
> was this commit part of this?
> 
> http://www.osoco.net/weblogs/rael/archives/000239.html

It's talking about the same thing. Only point is that the solution is 
specific to Avalon - not Fortress. I.e. the solution is a lifecycle 
extension.

Cheer, Stephen.


-- 

|------------------------------------------------|
| Magic by Merlin                                |
| Production by Avalon                           |
|                                                |
| http://avalon.apache.org/merlin                |
| http://dpml.net/merlin/distributions/latest    |
|------------------------------------------------|

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org