Excalibur I18N

[Berin Loritsch <bl...@apache.org>]

It appears Excalibur I18N is used by Excalibur Logger, which poses a
requirement to include the JAR as a dependency for both Fortress and
ECM.  Also because the components (DataSource, Monitor, SourceResolve,
Store, XMLUtil) use the ECM TestCase, they also have a test time
dependency on I18N.

The only code in the Excalibur set that really *uses* Excalibur i18n
is Excalibur Logger.  I understand that it is in use with both Merlin
and Phoenix.  Is that still true?

The question is whether we want to incorporate i18n's use as a real
requirement in all these components (from a runtime dependency on
Logger to a compile time dependency on i18n), or decouple Logger from
i18n.  Which makes more sense?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org

Re: Excalibur I18N

[Peter Donald <pe...@realityforge.org>]

On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:31 am, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> The only code in the Excalibur set that really *uses* Excalibur i18n
> is Excalibur Logger.  I understand that it is in use with both Merlin
> and Phoenix.  Is that still true?

In Phoenix it is still true. I believe some of the code may have been moved 
away from it but there is still at least 50% (if not more) still uses it. I 
can clean the rest over the next couple of weeks. The new code also fixes all 
those ugly classloader/caching roblems too - yay! 

-- 
Cheers,

Peter Donald
Sufficiently advanced science is 
 indistinguishable from magic" 
               -- Arthur C. Clarke


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org