You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by lin sun <li...@yahoo.com> on 2005/07/21 19:51:56 UTC
xfire jar files needed at runtime?
Hi all,
I noticed that the latest binary distribution of
geronimo (1.0-169186) contains the following 2 xfire
jar files:
xfire-20050202.jar
xfire-java-20050202.jar
Do we really need them at runtime? Any info is
appreciated.
thanks, Lin
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: xfire jar files needed at runtime?
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
I think that is the case for the rev you mention, and I'm fairly sure
of it for the current m4 branch. Best way is to try it to find out
:-). I'm 99% sure you will run into no problems as long as you don't
use web services, and 90% sure even if you do use web services.
thanks
david jencks
On Jul 21, 2005, at 11:25 AM, lin sun wrote:
> David,
>
> Thanks so much for your answer. Correct me if I
> understand incorrectly.... So we will need the two jar
> files to build the files you mentioned below, but we
> don't need the two jar files at runtime.
>
> Lin
>
>
>
> --- David Jencks <dj...@gluecode.com> wrote:
>
>> no, their use has been removed from head. In the
>> interests of greater
>> stability the files that depend on them, although
>> not actually used,
>> will not be removed from m4.
>>
>> We do hope to eventually create a working xfire ws
>> implementation, but
>> I hope we would do that as separate geronimo modules
>> rather than
>> embedded inside openejb core.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Jul 21, 2005, at 10:51 AM, lin sun wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I noticed that the latest binary distribution of
>>> geronimo (1.0-169186) contains the following 2
>> xfire
>>> jar files:
>>>
>>> xfire-20050202.jar
>>> xfire-java-20050202.jar
>>>
>>> Do we really need them at runtime? Any info is
>>> appreciated.
>>>
>>> thanks, Lin
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
>> protection around
>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Lin
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
>
Re: xfire jar files needed at runtime?
Posted by lin sun <li...@yahoo.com>.
David,
Thanks so much for your answer. Correct me if I
understand incorrectly.... So we will need the two jar
files to build the files you mentioned below, but we
don't need the two jar files at runtime.
Lin
--- David Jencks <dj...@gluecode.com> wrote:
> no, their use has been removed from head. In the
> interests of greater
> stability the files that depend on them, although
> not actually used,
> will not be removed from m4.
>
> We do hope to eventually create a working xfire ws
> implementation, but
> I hope we would do that as separate geronimo modules
> rather than
> embedded inside openejb core.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Jul 21, 2005, at 10:51 AM, lin sun wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I noticed that the latest binary distribution of
> > geronimo (1.0-169186) contains the following 2
> xfire
> > jar files:
> >
> > xfire-20050202.jar
> > xfire-java-20050202.jar
> >
> > Do we really need them at runtime? Any info is
> > appreciated.
> >
> > thanks, Lin
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
thanks,
Lin
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Re: xfire jar files needed at runtime?
Posted by David Jencks <dj...@gluecode.com>.
no, their use has been removed from head. In the interests of greater
stability the files that depend on them, although not actually used,
will not be removed from m4.
We do hope to eventually create a working xfire ws implementation, but
I hope we would do that as separate geronimo modules rather than
embedded inside openejb core.
thanks
david jencks
On Jul 21, 2005, at 10:51 AM, lin sun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that the latest binary distribution of
> geronimo (1.0-169186) contains the following 2 xfire
> jar files:
>
> xfire-20050202.jar
> xfire-java-20050202.jar
>
> Do we really need them at runtime? Any info is
> appreciated.
>
> thanks, Lin
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>