You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by anita kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com> on 2007/01/23 04:45:35 UTC
Connector specs
The connector 1.5 spec has dependency on jta-1.0.1B spec. Should
this be changed to jta_1.1? This would mean republishing the connector
spec..
Thanks
Anita
____________________________________________________________________________________
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail
Re: Connector specs
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
The connector spec was not updated for jee5 and if you check the
connector 1.5 specification is references jta 1.0.1b. It is the
correct dependency for that spec.
Regardless, there is not reason to change the pom, since it has no
effect on the jar or any one using the dependency. It would simply
be releasing a new version with no changes and I am very much against
doing that.
-dain
On Jan 23, 2007, at 12:40 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> IMO, its the wrong version, and regardless of what the Java EE TCK
> muck provides we should fix it.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2007, at 10:40 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
>> On Jan 22, 2007, at 9:33 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 22, 2007, at 9:28 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>>>> Should probably still change the dep to help ensure compatibility.
>>>>
>>>> Ensure compatibility how?
>>>
>>> I said "help ensure compatibility"...
>>>
>>> So that the spec is compiled against the same version that is
>>> included in the server distribution.
>>
>> Compatibility is ensured by the JEE CTS.
>>
>> -dain
>
Re: Connector specs
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
IMO, its the wrong version, and regardless of what the Java EE TCK
muck provides we should fix it.
--jason
On Jan 22, 2007, at 10:40 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2007, at 9:33 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> On Jan 22, 2007, at 9:28 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>>> Should probably still change the dep to help ensure compatibility.
>>>
>>> Ensure compatibility how?
>>
>> I said "help ensure compatibility"...
>>
>> So that the spec is compiled against the same version that is
>> included in the server distribution.
>
> Compatibility is ensured by the JEE CTS.
>
> -dain
Re: Connector specs
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
On Jan 22, 2007, at 9:33 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2007, at 9:28 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>> Should probably still change the dep to help ensure compatibility.
>>
>> Ensure compatibility how?
>
> I said "help ensure compatibility"...
>
> So that the spec is compiled against the same version that is
> included in the server distribution.
Compatibility is ensured by the JEE CTS.
-dain
Re: Connector specs
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
On Jan 22, 2007, at 9:28 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>> Should probably still change the dep to help ensure compatibility.
>
> Ensure compatibility how?
I said "help ensure compatibility"...
So that the spec is compiled against the same version that is
included in the server distribution.
--jason
Re: Connector specs
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Jan 22, 2007, at 8:34 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Should probably still change the dep to help ensure compatibility.
Ensure compatibility how?
-David
> --jason
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2007, at 8:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2007, at 7:45 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
>>
>>> The connector 1.5 spec has dependency on jta-1.0.1B spec. Should
>>> this be changed to jta_1.1? This would mean republishing the
>>> connector
>>> spec..
>>
>> That dep was marked as '<scope>provided' so that the dep on
>> jta_1.0.1B won't pollute our build via maven's transitivity. In
>> fact, all of the deps in every spec module was marked as provided
>> for the same reason.
>>
>> -David
>>
>
Re: Connector specs
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Should probably still change the dep to help ensure compatibility.
--jason
On Jan 22, 2007, at 8:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2007, at 7:45 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
>
>> The connector 1.5 spec has dependency on jta-1.0.1B spec. Should
>> this be changed to jta_1.1? This would mean republishing the
>> connector
>> spec..
>
> That dep was marked as '<scope>provided' so that the dep on
> jta_1.0.1B won't pollute our build via maven's transitivity. In
> fact, all of the deps in every spec module was marked as provided
> for the same reason.
>
> -David
>
Re: Connector specs
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Jan 22, 2007, at 7:45 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> The connector 1.5 spec has dependency on jta-1.0.1B spec. Should
> this be changed to jta_1.1? This would mean republishing the connector
> spec..
That dep was marked as '<scope>provided' so that the dep on
jta_1.0.1B won't pollute our build via maven's transitivity. In
fact, all of the deps in every spec module was marked as provided for
the same reason.
-David