You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by pnowojski <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2018/07/23 13:59:25 UTC

[GitHub] flink pull request #6392: [FLINK-9694][table] Fix NPE in CRowSerializerConfi...

GitHub user pnowojski opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6392

    [FLINK-9694][table] Fix NPE in CRowSerializerConfigSnapshot constructor

    ## What is the purpose of the change
    
    Fix NPE in CRowSerializerConfigSnapshot constructor
    
    ## Verifying this change
    
    This PR adds new test to cover regression.
    
    ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
    
      - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / **no**)
      - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with `@Public(Evolving)`: (yes / **no**)
      - The serializers: (yes / **no** / don't know)
      - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / **no** / don't know)
      - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (yes / **no** / don't know)
      - The S3 file system connector: (yes / **no** / don't know)
    
    ## Documentation
    
      - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / **no**)
      - If yes, how is the feature documented? (**not applicable** / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/pnowojski/flink f9694

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6392.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #6392
    
----
commit cfc62bb5a6728e9cc245e5daf8f2ace721d14f1c
Author: Piotr Nowojski <pi...@...>
Date:   2018-07-23T13:27:03Z

    [FLINK-9694][table] Fix NPE in CRowSerializerConfigSnapshot constructor

----


---

[GitHub] flink issue #6392: [FLINK-9694][table] Fix NPE in CRowSerializerConfigSnapsh...

Posted by tzulitai <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user tzulitai commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6392
  
    LGTM, +1


---

[GitHub] flink pull request #6392: [FLINK-9694][table] Fix NPE in CRowSerializerConfi...

Posted by pnowojski <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user pnowojski commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6392#discussion_r204696678
  
    --- Diff: flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/common/typeutils/CompositeTypeSerializerConfigSnapshot.java ---
    @@ -46,8 +46,6 @@
     	public CompositeTypeSerializerConfigSnapshot() {}
     
     	public CompositeTypeSerializerConfigSnapshot(TypeSerializer<?>... nestedSerializers) {
    -		Preconditions.checkNotNull(nestedSerializers);
    --- End diff --
    
    Ops, scratch that. It wasn't dead code, `CompositeTypeSerializerConfigSnapshot( (TypeSerializer<>[]) null)` would probably trigger this condition. Reverted


---

[GitHub] flink issue #6392: [FLINK-9694][table] Fix NPE in CRowSerializerConfigSnapsh...

Posted by yanghua <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user yanghua commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6392
  
    +1, I will close my PR #6231 about this issue


---

[GitHub] flink pull request #6392: [FLINK-9694][table] Fix NPE in CRowSerializerConfi...

Posted by tzulitai <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user tzulitai commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6392#discussion_r204684670
  
    --- Diff: flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/common/typeutils/CompositeTypeSerializerConfigSnapshot.java ---
    @@ -46,8 +46,6 @@
     	public CompositeTypeSerializerConfigSnapshot() {}
     
     	public CompositeTypeSerializerConfigSnapshot(TypeSerializer<?>... nestedSerializers) {
    -		Preconditions.checkNotNull(nestedSerializers);
    --- End diff --
    
    Not sure about this. It should be perfectly fine that we have a null check here.


---

[GitHub] flink issue #6392: [FLINK-9694][table] Fix NPE in CRowSerializerConfigSnapsh...

Posted by pnowojski <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user pnowojski commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6392
  
    Thanks, merging


---

[GitHub] flink pull request #6392: [FLINK-9694][table] Fix NPE in CRowSerializerConfi...

Posted by asfgit <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6392


---

[GitHub] flink pull request #6392: [FLINK-9694][table] Fix NPE in CRowSerializerConfi...

Posted by pnowojski <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user pnowojski commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6392#discussion_r204695915
  
    --- Diff: flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/common/typeutils/CompositeTypeSerializerConfigSnapshot.java ---
    @@ -46,8 +46,6 @@
     	public CompositeTypeSerializerConfigSnapshot() {}
     
     	public CompositeTypeSerializerConfigSnapshot(TypeSerializer<?>... nestedSerializers) {
    -		Preconditions.checkNotNull(nestedSerializers);
    --- End diff --
    
    Wasn't that a dead code? `CompositeTypeSerializerConfigSnapshot(null)` resolves to `CompositeTypeSerializerConfigSnapshot(new TypeSerializer<>{null})`.


---