You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@logging.apache.org by Mark Womack <mw...@apache.org> on 2005/09/22 05:31:02 UTC
CVS -> SVN Migration Status
chainsaw - Build process verified (Scott)
log4jcxx - Repository reviewed, still need to verify the build process (Curt
todo).
log4j - Build process for the head and the 1_2branch verified for the
classes/jars. Still need to verify the dist builds which are dependent on
the logging-site repository (see below). (Mark)
log4net - Build process verified (Nicko)
sandbox - Build process verified. But when we move it for real we want to
move the current code into a sandbox/log4j subdir if we can. If not, then
we'll just do it manually after the migration. The sandbox will be shared
by all of the subprojects. (Mark)
site - I still cannot check out the site. Is anyone else encountering this,
or is it just me? My cygwin svn command line client works fine with all of
the other repositories except for logging-site. I'll try a different client
tomorrow evening.
Thanks everyone. With hurricane Rita bearing down on Curt's location we may
be delayed in completing the entire migration. But we are almost there and
things are looking good (except for Rita, of course).
-Mark
Re: CVS -> SVN Migration Status
Posted by Mark Womack <mw...@apache.org>.
Thanks, Henri. I will take a look at the new versions tomorrow.
All, please take a look at your respective subproject related repos. If
there are any issues, now is the time to bring it up. Otherwise we will do
the conversion as Henri mentions.
thanks,
-Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henri Yandell" <ba...@apache.org>
To: "Mark Womack" <mw...@apache.org>
Cc: "Logging General" <ge...@logging.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: CVS -> SVN Migration Status
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/logging/
>
> I repeated the migration, log4j-sandbox now found in
> logging/sandbox/log4j, and the site now keeps its branches/tags.
>
> See how it looks, unless I hear otherwise I'll go ahead and do the real
> migration at 8pm on Saturday US/Eastern.
>
> Hen
>
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Mark Womack wrote:
>
>> Henri, et al,
>>
>> I believe we are good to go for the migration, with the following
>> changes:
>>
>> logging-sandbox : Move the existing cvs dirs into a "log4j" subdir.
>>
>> logging-site : We need the branches and tags moved over from the cvs
>> repo. Also, please double check the settings on this repo as I could only
>> checkout using http, not https. No one else seemed to have this issue,
>> just me.
>>
>> You had also previously mentioned something about a "core" repo yet to be
>> converted. I don't know what that one is.
>>
>> Let us know what the next steps will be. With the above, we are ready to
>> go (finally).
>>
>> much appreciated,
>> -Mark
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Womack" <mw...@apache.org>
>> To: "Logging General" <ge...@logging.apache.org>; <ba...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 8:31 PM
>> Subject: CVS -> SVN Migration Status
>>
>>
>>> chainsaw - Build process verified (Scott)
>>>
>>> log4jcxx - Repository reviewed, still need to verify the build process
>>> (Curt todo).
>>>
>>> log4j - Build process for the head and the 1_2branch verified for the
>>> classes/jars. Still need to verify the dist builds which are dependent
>>> on the logging-site repository (see below). (Mark)
>>>
>>> log4net - Build process verified (Nicko)
>>>
>>> sandbox - Build process verified. But when we move it for real we want
>>> to move the current code into a sandbox/log4j subdir if we can. If not,
>>> then we'll just do it manually after the migration. The sandbox will be
>>> shared by all of the subprojects. (Mark)
>>>
>>> site - I still cannot check out the site. Is anyone else encountering
>>> this, or is it just me? My cygwin svn command line client works fine
>>> with all of the other repositories except for logging-site. I'll try a
>>> different client tomorrow evening.
>>>
>>> Thanks everyone. With hurricane Rita bearing down on Curt's location we
>>> may be delayed in completing the entire migration. But we are almost
>>> there and things are looking good (except for Rita, of course).
>>>
>>> -Mark
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: CVS -> SVN Migration Status
Posted by Mark Womack <mw...@apache.org>.
Ceki (or anyone), can you shed any light on the logging "core" cvs module?
Have we used it for anything?
-Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: <ba...@apache.org>
To: "Mark Womack" <mw...@apache.org>
Cc: "Logging General" <ge...@logging.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: CVS -> SVN Migration Status
>
> I'll do some work tomorrow on a repeat migration to test to cover the
> sandbox and site issues, then leaving that there for you to check, I'll
> aim to do the real migration on Saturday at 8pm US/Eastern.
>
> -
>
> I'll deal with the various tlp-core modules that are out there at a later
> stage. I think they're private pmc modules, but the fact that you don't
> use yours (by the sound of it) implies they might not be very essential.
>
> I've asked the various root@ people if I could have temporary group
> membership to various tlp's so I can see inside the directories in order
> to get the migration done.
>
> Hen
Re: CVS -> SVN Migration Status
Posted by Mark Womack <mw...@apache.org>.
Henri, et al,
I believe we are good to go for the migration, with the following changes:
logging-sandbox : Move the existing cvs dirs into a "log4j" subdir.
logging-site : We need the branches and tags moved over from the cvs repo.
Also, please double check the settings on this repo as I could only checkout
using http, not https. No one else seemed to have this issue, just me.
You had also previously mentioned something about a "core" repo yet to be
converted. I don't know what that one is.
Let us know what the next steps will be. With the above, we are ready to go
(finally).
much appreciated,
-Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Womack" <mw...@apache.org>
To: "Logging General" <ge...@logging.apache.org>; <ba...@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 8:31 PM
Subject: CVS -> SVN Migration Status
> chainsaw - Build process verified (Scott)
>
> log4jcxx - Repository reviewed, still need to verify the build process
> (Curt todo).
>
> log4j - Build process for the head and the 1_2branch verified for the
> classes/jars. Still need to verify the dist builds which are dependent on
> the logging-site repository (see below). (Mark)
>
> log4net - Build process verified (Nicko)
>
> sandbox - Build process verified. But when we move it for real we want to
> move the current code into a sandbox/log4j subdir if we can. If not, then
> we'll just do it manually after the migration. The sandbox will be shared
> by all of the subprojects. (Mark)
>
> site - I still cannot check out the site. Is anyone else encountering
> this, or is it just me? My cygwin svn command line client works fine with
> all of the other repositories except for logging-site. I'll try a
> different client tomorrow evening.
>
> Thanks everyone. With hurricane Rita bearing down on Curt's location we
> may be delayed in completing the entire migration. But we are almost
> there and things are looking good (except for Rita, of course).
>
> -Mark
>
>
Re: CVS -> SVN Migration Status
Posted by Yoav Shapira <yo...@apache.org>.
Hi,
I just checked out logging-site from the test repo, did a tiny modification,
built, committed -- all worked fine...
Yoav
--- Mark Womack <mw...@apache.org> wrote:
> chainsaw - Build process verified (Scott)
>
> log4jcxx - Repository reviewed, still need to verify the build process (Curt
> todo).
>
> log4j - Build process for the head and the 1_2branch verified for the
> classes/jars. Still need to verify the dist builds which are dependent on
> the logging-site repository (see below). (Mark)
>
> log4net - Build process verified (Nicko)
>
> sandbox - Build process verified. But when we move it for real we want to
> move the current code into a sandbox/log4j subdir if we can. If not, then
> we'll just do it manually after the migration. The sandbox will be shared
> by all of the subprojects. (Mark)
>
> site - I still cannot check out the site. Is anyone else encountering this,
> or is it just me? My cygwin svn command line client works fine with all of
> the other repositories except for logging-site. I'll try a different client
> tomorrow evening.
>
> Thanks everyone. With hurricane Rita bearing down on Curt's location we may
> be delayed in completing the entire migration. But we are almost there and
> things are looking good (except for Rita, of course).
>
> -Mark
>
>
>