You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mesos.apache.org by "Benjamin Mahler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/09/11 01:54:07 UTC
[jira] [Assigned] (MESOS-273) Add a Bytes abstraction akin to
Duration
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Benjamin Mahler reassigned MESOS-273:
-------------------------------------
Assignee: Benjamin Mahler
> Add a Bytes abstraction akin to Duration
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: MESOS-273
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-273
> Project: Mesos
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Benjamin Mahler
> Assignee: Benjamin Mahler
>
> We've accumulated a lot of cruft around amount of memory/disk.
> via benh: "It's really time for a Bytes/Kilobytes/Megabytes/Gigabytes struct. Unlike Duration, maybe it makes sense to just create a single Bytes class as the "base", or maybe call it Bits? Not sure if Size or Data are descriptive enough."
> My thoughts:
> Size: typically refers to number of things (list::size, vector::size, map::size, ...)
> Data: typically refers to the data itself, rather than size (char* data, string data, ...)
> Bytes: although works fine at the unit level, like Seconds, seems odd as the base class (makes me think of actual byte data, rather than # of bytes).
> Duration worked nicely to avoid doing Amount<Time>, however in this case it's tricker to avoid Amount<Data> ( https://github.com/twitter/commons/tree/master/src/java/com/twitter/common/quantity )
> I'd go with Bytes or Bits, preferably Bytes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira