RE: Invalid C++ with ignoring anonymous type >

[Iwan Tomlow <iw...@seagha.com>]

Ok, thanks for the explanation, that makes things a little more clear.
Unfortunately, I don't control the WSDL-definition, I just received it and
have to create a C++-client for it.
My knowledge about WSDL itself is rather limited, guess I will have to look
deeper into that first...

-----Original Message-----
From: John Hawkins [mailto:HAWKINSJ@uk.ibm.com] 
Sent: woensdag 30 november 2005 17:13
To: Apache AXIS C User List
Subject: RE: Invalid C++ with ignoring anonymous type >




Iwan Tomlow <iw...@seagha.com> wrote on 30/11/2005 11:38:13:

> Rpc or doc: the default for WSDL2Ws, that is rpc/enc as I gather from the
> documentation? 
Rpc or doc  is related to your WSDL definition - not what wsdl2ws produces.
In you care you using rpc/encoded. I would recommend using doc/literal as
this is ws-i compliant and rpc/encoded is not. We support doc/literal far
better. 

You've also got refs in here - which are not supported. They might be
supported in 1.6 which is due out in the next few weeks. 

I suggest, if you can, recreate the wsdl with doc/literal bindings and
without refs. 

> My command is "java org.apache.axis.wsdl.wsdl2ws.WSDL2Ws ref_mod.wsdl
> -o./Out -lc++ -sclient"
> 
> I did see an issue in jira stating that refs didn't work, but the sample
> provided in axis-c-1-5\deploy\wsdls\ref.wsdl produced C++ code without
> problems?
> 
> I attached the modified ref.wsdl again, hope it comes through this way.
> 
> Thanks for your help
> 
> [attachment "ref_mod.wsdl" deleted by John Hawkins/UK/IBM]