You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Davide Giannella (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/06/09 12:53:18 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (OAK-5935) AbstractSharedCachingDataStore#getRecordIfStored should use the underlying cache.get

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Davide Giannella closed OAK-5935.
---------------------------------

Bulk close for 1.7.1

> AbstractSharedCachingDataStore#getRecordIfStored should use the underlying cache.get
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-5935
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5935
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: blob
>            Reporter: Amit Jain
>            Assignee: Amit Jain
>             Fix For: 1.8, 1.7.1, 1.6.2
>
>
> The {{AbstractSharedCachingDataStore#getRecordIfStored}} can possibly use cache.get(dataIdentifier.toString()) instead of cache.getIfPresent(dataIdentifier.toString()) to load the binary in the cache from the backend, 
> The access pattern has to be evaluated but possibly we always do a getStream() after retrieving a record. The GC code already bypasses this with OAK-4573.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)